Cited by 204Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The rASRM score and the Enzian classification for endometriosis: their strengths and weaknesses

Open access
HAAS, DIETMAR, SHEBL, OMAR, SHAMIYEH, ANDREAS, OPPELT, PETER·2013·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

The revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) score is currently the best‐known classification of endometriosis and is the one most widely used throughout the world. It is relatively easy to use, but it does not take into account the involvement of retroperitoneal structures with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. For this reason, the Enzian classification was developed as a supplement to the rASRM score, in order to provide a morphologically descriptive classification of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. The Enzian classification currently has a poor level of international acceptance and is mainly used in the German‐speaking countries. It was revised in 2011 and is now also easier to use. This article describes the strengths and weaknesses of the rASRM score and the Enzian classification and their common potential for classifying endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.12026

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAAS, D., SHEBL, O., SHAMIYEH, A., & OPPELT, P.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • Women's General Hospital (AT)
  • Gespag (AT)
Corresponding author
HAAS, DIETMAR
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-05
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W1546737420
Cited by
204
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, Enzian classification, endometriosis classification, deep infiltrating endometriosis, retroperitoneal endometriosis, morphological classification, diagnostic scoring system
MeSH terms
Diagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and Gynecological, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Societies, Medical, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review