Cited by 44Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

Virtual Surgical Planning and Customized Subperiosteal Titanium Maxillary Implant (CSTMI) for Three Dimensional Reconstruction and Dental Implants of Maxillary Defects after Oncological Resection: Case Series

Open access
Cebrián Carretero, Jose Luís, Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, José Luis, Montesdeoca García, Néstor, Garrido Martínez, Pablo, Pampín Martínez, Marta María, Aragón Niño, Iñigo, Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio, Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos·2022·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Maxillectomies cause malocclusion, masticatory disorders, swallowing disorders and poor nasolabial projection, with consequent esthetic and functional sequelae. Reconstruction can be achieved with conventional approaches, such as closure of the maxillary defect by microvascular free flap surgery or prosthetic obturation. Four patients with segmental maxillary defects that had been reconstructed with customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) through virtual surgical planning (VSP), STL models and CAD/CAM titanium mesh were included. The smallest maxillary defect was 4.1 cm and the largest defect was 9.6 cm, with an average of 7.1 cm. The reconstructed maxillary vertical dimension ranged from 9.3 mm to 17.4 mm, with a mean of 13.17 mm. The transverse dimension of the maxilla at the crestal level was attempted to be reconstructed based on the pre-excision CT scan, and these measurements ranged from 6.5 mm in the premaxilla area to 14.6 mm at the posterior level. All patients were rehabilitated with a fixed prosthesis on subperiosteal implants with good esthetic and functional results. In conclusion, we believe that customized subperiosteal titanium maxillary implants (CSTMI) are a safe alternative for maxillary defects reconstruction, allowing for simultaneous dental rehabilitation while restoring midface projection. Nonetheless, prospective and randomized trials are required with long-term follow-up, to assess its long-term performance and safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm11154594

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology.

    “These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology [25–32].”

    From Innovative landing zones for one-piece, rigidly fixated patient-specific subperiosteal implants in dental rehabilitation of severe maxillary and midfacial defects (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Case Presentation describes a custom-made sintered-titanium subperiosteal implant for dental rehabilitation after maxillary resection, and the Discussion describes functional benefits of such implants (pages not provided). The paper does not identify IPS Implants® Preprosthetic, describe cranial-base anchorage, or establish that it is uniquely distinct from laser-melted implants. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cebrián Carretero, J. L., Del Castillo Pardo de Vera, J. L., Montesdeoca García, N., Garrido Martínez, P., Pampín Martínez, M. M., Aragón Niño, I., Navarro Cuéllar, I., & Navarro Cuéllar, C.
Affiliations
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Hospital La Luz, 28003 Madrid, Spain
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, General Universitario HLA Moncloa, Avenida de Valladolid, 83, 28008 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-06
Volume
11
Issue
15
Pages
4594
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290580742
Cited by
40
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 1
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
maxillary reconstruction, patient-specific implants, virtual surgical planning, maxillectomy, oncological resection, 3D reconstruction, fixed prosthesis, dental rehabilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review