Cited by 10Information and Cyber SecuritySmart Grid Security and ResilienceRisk and Safety Analysis

Security and Independence of Process Safety and Control Systems in the Petroleum Industry

Open access
Onshus, Tor, Bodsberg, Lars, Hauge, Stein, Jaatun, Martin Gilje, Lundteigen, Mary Ann, Myklebust, Thor, Ottermo, Maria Vatshaug, Petersen, Stig +1 more·2022·Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy

Abstract

The developments of reduced manning on offshore facilities and increased information transfer from offshore to land continue and may also be a prerequisite for the future survival of the oil and gas industry. A general requirement from the operators has emerged in that all relevant information from offshore-located systems should be made available so that it can be analysed on land. This represents a challenge to safety in avoiding negative impacts and potential accidents for these facilities. The layered Purdue model, which helps protect OT systems from unwanted influences through network segregation, is undermined by the many new connections arising between the OT systems and the surroundings. Each individual connection is not necessarily a problem; however, in aggregate, they add to the overall complexity and attack surface thereby exposing the OT systems to increased cyber risk. Since the OT systems are critical to controlling physical processes, the added connections represent a challenge not only to security but also to safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcp2010003

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complete separation in a modern IIoT environment is not possible.

    “However, complete separation in a modern IIoT environment is not possible [76].”

    From Mapping of Industrial IoT to IEC 62443 Standards (2025) · cites this paper as [76]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onshus, T., Bodsberg, L., Hauge, S., Jaatun, M. G., Lundteigen, M. A., Myklebust, T., Ottermo, M. V., Petersen, S., & Wille, E.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • SINTEF Digital (NO)
  • SINTEF (NO)
Corresponding author
Bodsberg, Lars
Venue
Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-12
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
20-41
ISSN
2624-800X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229074755
Cited by
10
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cybersecurity and Privacy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
Keywords
process safety, control systems, oil and gas industry, offshore installations, industrial control systems, cybersecurity risks, Purdue model, network segregation, attack surface, information transmission, reduced manning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review