Cited by 4Nutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrailty in Older Adults

Anthropometric Measurements for Predicting Low Appendicular Lean Mass Index for the Diagnosis of Sarcopenia: A Machine Learning Model

Open access
González-Martin, Ana M., Limón-Villegas, Edgar Samid, Reyes-Castillo, Zyanya, Esparza-Ros, Francisco, Hernández-Palma, Luis Alexis, Santillán-Rivera, Minerva Saraí, Herrera-Amante, Carlos Abraham, Ramos-García, César Octavio +1 more·2025·Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a progressive muscle disease that compromises mobility and quality of life in older adults. Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for assessing Appendicular Lean Mass Index (ALMI), it is costly and often inaccessible. This study aims to develop machine learning models using anthropometric measurements to predict low ALMI for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 183 Mexican adults (67.2% women and 32.8% men, ≥60 years old). ALMI was measured using DXA, and anthropometric data were collected following the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocols. Predictive models were developed using Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DTs), Random Forests (RFs), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and LASSO regression. The dataset was split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Model performance was evaluated using classification performance metrics and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: ALMI indicated strong correlations with BMI, corrected calf girth, and arm relaxed girth. Among models, DT achieved the best performance in females (AUC = 0.84), and ANN indicated the highest AUC in males (0.92). Regarding the prediction of low ALMI, specificity values were highest in DT for females (100%), while RF performed best in males (92%). The key predictive variables varied depending on sex, with BMI and calf girth being the most relevant for females and arm girth for males. Conclusions: Anthropometry combined with machine learning provides an accurate, low-cost approach for identifying low ALMI in older adults. This method could facilitate sarcopenia screening in clinical settings with limited access to advanced diagnostic tools.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jfmk10030276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kinanthropometry has refined anthropometry's analytical capacity, enabling the estimation of five-component body composition models (adipose, muscular, skeletal, skin, and residual mass) with standardized ISAK protocols.

    “However, new approaches such as kinanthropometry have refined its analytical capacity, enabling the estimation of five-component body composition models (adipose, muscular, skeletal, skin, and residual mass) with standardized ISAK protocols [150].”

    From The Seven Methods for the Evaluation of Nutritional Status—ABCDEFG: Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [150]

    The Methods (§2.2.2; page unavailable) state that anthropometric measurements followed a standardized ISAK protocol, and the Introduction describes anthropometry as a way to assess body composition. Our copy does not state that kinanthropometry enables estimation of the specified five-component model, so that central part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. [1]Soto-Perez-de-Celis E. de Glas N.A. Hsu T. Kanesvaran R. Steer C. Navarrete-Reyes A.P. Battisti N.M.L. Chavarri-Guerra Y. O’Donovan A. Avila-Funes J.A. Global geriatric oncology: Achievements and challenges J. Geriatr. Oncol. 2017 8 374 386 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.06.001 28642040 · DOI
  2. [3]De Cabo R. Le Couteur D. Kasper D. Fauci A. Hauser S. Longo D. Jameson J. Loscalzo J. The biology of aging Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine McGraw-Hill Education New York, NY, USA 2015 94e1 94e8
  3. [4]Manrique-Espinoza B. Salinas-Rodríguez A. Moreno-Tamayo K.M. Acosta-Castillo I. Sosa-Ortiz A.L. Gutiérrez-Robledo L.M. Téllez-Rojo M.M. Condiciones de salud y estado funcional de los adultos mayores en México Salud Public. Mex. 2013 55 S323 S331 10.21149/spm.v55s2.5131 24626711 · DOI
  4. [5]Steffl M. Sima J. Shiells K. Holmerova I. The increase in health care costs associated with muscle weakness in older people without long-term illnesses in the Czech Republic: Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Clin. Int. Aging 2017 12 2003 2007 10.2147/CIA.S150826 29225462 PMC5708194 · DOI
  5. [6]Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Bahat G. Bauer J. Boirie Y. Bruyère O. Cederholm T. Cooper C. Landi F. Rolland Y. Sayer A.A. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis Age Ageing 2019 48 16 31 10.1093/ageing/afy169 30312372 PMC6322506 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Musumeci G. Sarcopenia and Exercise “The State of the Art” J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2017 2 40 10.3390/jfmk2040040 · DOI
  7. [8]Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Baeyens J.P. Bauer J.M. Boirie Y. Cederholm T. Landi F. Martin F.C. Michel J.P. Rolland Y. Schneider S.M. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People Age Ageing 2010 39 412 423 10.1093/ageing/afq034 20392703 PMC2886201 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Chen L.-K. Woo J. Assantachai P. Auyeung T.-W. Chou M.-Y. Iijima K. Jang H.C. Kang L. Kim M. Kim S. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment JAMDA 2020 21 300 307.e2 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012 32033882 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Morley J.E. Vellas B. Abellan van Kan G. Anker S.D. Bauer J.M. Bernabei R. Cesari M. Chumlea W.C. Doehner W. Evans J. Frailty consensus: A call to action JAMDA 2013 14 392 397 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022 23764209 PMC4084863 · DOI
  10. [11]Bauer J. Morley J.E. Schols A.M.W.J. Ferrucci L. Cruz-Jentoft A.J. Dent E. Baracos V.E. Crawford J.A. Doehner W. Heymsfield S.B. Sarcopenia: A time for action. An SCWD position paper J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019 10 956 961 10.1002/jcsm.12483 31523937 PMC6818450 · DOI
  11. [12]Bhasin S. Travison T.G. Manini T.M. Patel S. Pencina K.M. Fielding R.A. Magaziner J.M. Newman A.B. Kiel D.P. Cooper C. Sarcopenia definition: The position statements of the sarcopenia definition and outcomes consortium JAGS 2020 68 1410 1418 10.1111/jgs.16372 PMC12132920 32150289 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [13]Suzan V. Suzan A.A. A bibliometric analysis of sarcopenia: Top 100 articles Eur. Geriatr. Med. 2021 12 185 191 10.1007/s41999-020-00395-y 32974886 · DOI
  13. [14]Kemmler W. von Stengel S. Kohl M. Developing sarcopenia criteria and cutoffs for an older caucasian cohort—A strictly biometrical approach; a strictly biometrical approach Clin. Int. Aging 2018 13 1365 1373 10.2147/CIA.S167899 PMC6078090 30122908 · DOI
  14. [15]Woo J. Leung J. Anthropometric cut points for definition of sarcopenia based on incident mobility and physical limitation in older chinese people J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016 71 935 940 10.1093/gerona/glv197 26519945 · DOI
  15. [16]Calvani R. Picca A. Marini F. Biancolillo A. Cesari M. Pesce V. Lezza A.M.S. Bossola M. Leeuwenburgh C. Bernabei R. The “BIOmarkers associated with sarcopenia and physical frailty in elderly persons” (BIOSPHERE) study: Rationale, design and methods Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2018 56 19 25 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.05.001 29753582 PMC6367722 · DOI
  16. [17]Confortin S.C. Ono L.M. Barbosa A.R. d’Orsi E. Sarcopenia e sua associação com mudanças nos fatores socioeconômicos, comportamentais e de saúde: Estudo EpiFloripa Idoso Cad. Saúde Pública 2018 34 10.1590/0102-311x00164917 30517315 · DOI
  17. [18]Espinel-Bermúdez M.C. Sánchez-García S. García Peña C. Trujillo X. Huerta-Viera M. Granados-García V. Hernández-González S. Arias-Merino E.D. Factores asociados a sarcopenia en adultos mayores mexicanos: Encuesta nacional de salud y nutrición 2012 Rev. Med. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc. 2018 56 46 53 29624960
  18. [19]Martín Sierra J.A. Calderón Loeza G.Y. Zapata Vázquez R.E. Novelo Tec J.F. Sarcopenia y factores asociados en los adultos mayores de una unidad de medicina familiar en Yucatán, México Atención Fam. 2021 28 191 10.22201/fm.14058871p.2021.3.79585 · DOI
  19. [20]Palus S. Springer J.I. Doehner W. von Haehling S. Anker M. Anker S.D. Springer J. Models of sarcopenia: Short review Int. J. Cardiol. 2017 238 19 21 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.152 28465116 · DOI
  20. [21]Alemán-Mateo H. Lee S.Y. Javed F. Thornton J. Heymsfield S.B. Pierson R.N. Pi-Sunyer F.X. Wang Z.M. Wang J. Gallagher D. Elderly Mexicans have less muscle and greater total and truncal fat compared to African-Americans and Caucasians with the same BMI J. Nutr. Health Aging 2009 13 919 923 10.1007/s12603-009-0252-1 19924354 PMC2819676 · DOI
  21. [22]Alemán-Mateo H. López-Teros M.T. Ruiz-Valenzuela R.E. Ramírez-Torres M. Urquidez-Romero R. Sarcopenia: Influence of regional skeletal muscle cutoff points and fat-free mass in older mexican people—A pilot study Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2020 8037503 1 9 10.1155/2020/8037503 PMC7281843 32549890 · DOI
  22. [24]Pinheiro P.A. da Silva Coqueiro R. Carneiro J.A.O. Correia T.M.L. Pereira R. Fernandes M.H. Anthropometric indicators as screening tools for sarcopenia in older adult women Enferm 2020 30 269 274 30737176
  23. [26]Rangel Peniche D.B. Alemán Mateo H. de los Angeles Aguilera Barreiro M. Ruiz Valenzuela R.E. Ramírez-Torres M. Urquidez-Romero R. Differences in body composition in older people from two regions of Mexico: Implications for diagnoses of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity Biomed. Res. Int. 2018 1 9 10.1155/2018/7538625 30105245 PMC6076905 · DOI
  24. [27]Greener J.G. Kandathil S.M. Moffat L. Jones D.T. A guide to machine learning for biologists Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022 23 40 55 10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 34518686 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [28]Panch T. Szolovits P. Atun R. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and health systems J. Glob. Health 2018 8 020303 10.7189/jogh.08.020303 30405904 PMC6199467 · DOI
  26. [29]Zhang Y. Wang Z. Zhang J. Wang C. Wang Y. Chen H. Shan L. Huo J. Gu J. Ma X. Deep learning model for classifying endometrial lesions J. Transl. Med. 2021 19 10 10.1186/s12967-020-02660-x 33407588 PMC7788977 · DOI
  27. [30]Ou Yang W.-Y. Lai C.-C. Tsou M.-T. Hwang L.-C. Development of machine learning models for prediction of osteoporosis from clinical health examination data Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2021 18 7635 10.3390/ijerph18147635 34300086 PMC8305021 · DOI
  28. [31]Albores-Mendez E.M. Aguilera Hernández A.D. Melo-González A. Vargas-Hernández M.A. Gutierrez de la Cruz N. Vazquez-Guzman M.A. Castro-Marín M. Romero-Morelos P. Winkler R. A diagnostic model for overweight and obesity from untargeted urine metabolomics of soldiers PeerJ 2022 10 e13754 10.7717/peerj.13754 35898940 PMC9310780 · DOI
  29. [32]Butler É.M. Derraik J.G.B. Taylor R.W. Cutfield W.S. Prediction models for early childhood obesity: Applicability and existing issues Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2018 90 358 367 10.1159/000496563 30739117 · DOI
  30. [33]Chung H. Jo Y. Ryu D. Jeong C. Choe S. Lee J. Artificial-intelligence-driven discovery of prognostic biomarker for sarcopenia J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021 12 2220 2230 10.1002/jcsm.12840 34704369 PMC8718042 · DOI
  31. [34]Cook N.R. Statistical evaluation of prognostic versus diagnostic models: Beyond the ROC curve Clin. Chem. 2008 54 17 23 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096529 18024533 · DOI
  32. [36]Wolf M.B. DeLand E.C. A comprehensive, computer-model-based approach for diagnosis and treatment of complex acid–base disorders in critically-ill patients J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2011 25 353 364 10.1007/s10877-011-9320-2 22081258 · DOI
  33. [37]von Elm E. Altman D.G. Egger M. Pocock S.J. Gøtzsche P.C. Vandenbroucke J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies Lancet 2007 370 1453 1457 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X 18064739 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [38]Messina C. Albano D. Gitto S. Tofanelli L. Bazzocchi A. Ulivieri F.M. Guglielmi G. Sconfienza L.M. Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: From basics to new tools Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2020 10 1687 1698 10.21037/qims.2020.03.02 32742961 PMC7378094 · DOI
  35. [40]Barraza Gómez F. Hadler Garcés A. Jeria Fernández J. Riffo Esquivel C. Cuantificación de la masa muscular de los miembros apendiculares, por medio ecuaciones antropométricas J. Mov. Health. 2009 10 44 48 10.5027/jmh-Vol10-Issue1(2009)art37 · DOI
  36. [41]Herrera-Amante C.A. Ramos-García C.O. Alacid F. Quiroga-Morales L.A. Martínez-Rubio A.J. Bonilla D.A. Development of alternatives to estimate resting metabolic rate from anthropometric variables in paralympic swimmers J. Sports Sci. 2021 39 2133 2143 10.1080/02640414.2021.1922175 34148529 · DOI
  37. [42]Bonilla D.A. De León L.G. Alexander-Cortez P. Odriozola-Martínez A. Herrera-Amante C.A. Vargas-Molina S. Petro J.L. Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: Scoping review and reference values Nutr. Health 2022 28 95 109 10.1177/02601060211002941 33792415 · DOI
  38. [43]Ge S. Du Q. Feng X. Liu Y. Wang H. Hai S. Shi X. Sun W. Ma A. Lv T. Optimal cutoffs for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in older Chinese adults Front. Nutr. 2022 9 853323 10.3389/fnut.2022.853323 35866082 PMC9294727 · DOI
  39. [44]Kim Y.-P. Joh J.-Y. Kim S. Hwang H.-S. Shin I.-S. The application of different appendicular skeletal muscle cutoff points and research definitions associated with health-related quality of life in Korean older people: Data from KNHANES 2008–2011 BMC Geriatr. 2014 14 144 10.1186/1471-2318-14-144 25535336 PMC4289545 · DOI
  40. [45]López-Teros M.T. Rosas-Carrasco O. Sánchez-García S. Castro-Porras L. Luna-López A. Agudelo-Botero M. The association of osteosarcopenia with functional disability in community-dwelling Mexican adults 50 and older Front. Med. 2021 8 674724 10.3389/fmed.2021.674724 PMC8215205 34164416 · DOI
  41. [46]Viana J.U. Dias J.M.D. Pereira L.S.M. Silva S.L.A.D. Hoelzle L.F. Dias R.C. Pontos de corte alternativos para massa muscular apendicular para verificação da sarcopenia em idosos brasileiros: Dados da Rede Fibra—Belo Horizonte/Brasil Fisioter. E Pesqui. 2018 25 166 172 10.1590/1809-2950/17533725022018 · DOI
  42. [48]Mukaka M.M. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research Malawi Med. J. 2012 24 69 71 23638278 PMC3576830
  43. [51]Shaikhina T. Lowe D. Daga S. Briggs D. Higgings R. Khovanova N. Decision tree and random forest models for outcome prediction in antibody incompatible kidney transplantation Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2019 52 456 462 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.01.012 · DOI
  44. [53]Horning N. Random Forests: An algorithm for image classification and generation of continuous fields data sets Proceedings of the International Conference on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences Osaka, Japan 9–11 December 2010 Volume 911 1 6
  45. [54]Olshvang D. Harris C. Chellappa R. Santhanam P. Predictive modeling of lean body mass, appendicular lean mass, and appendicular skeletal muscle mass using machine learning techniques: A comprehensive analysis utilizing NHANES data and the Look AHEAD study PLoS ONE 2024 19 e0309830 10.1371/journal.pone.0309830 39240958 PMC11379308 · DOI
  46. [55]Cichosz S.L. Rasmussen N.H. Vestergaard P. Hejlesen O. Precise prediction of total body lean and fat mass from anthropometric and demographic data: Development and validation of neural network models J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2021 15 1337 1343 10.1177/1932296820971348 33190515 PMC8655297 · DOI
  47. [56]Buccheri E. Dell’Aquila D. Russo M. Chiaramonte R. Musumeci G. Vecchio M. Can artificial intelligence simplify the screening of muscle mass loss? Heliyon 2023 9 e16323 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16323 37251872 PMC10208931 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [57]Marazzato F. McCarthy C. Field R.H. Nguyen H. Nguyen T. Shepherd J.A. Tinsley G.M. Heymsfield S.B. Advances in digital anthropometric body composition assessment: Neural network algorithm prediction of appendicular lean mass Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024 78 452 454 10.1038/s41430-023-01396-3 38142263 · DOI
  49. [58]Birk N. Kulkarni B. Bhogadi S. Aggarwal A. Walia G.K. Gupta V. Rani U. Mahajan H. Kinra S. Mallinson P.A. Machine learning-based equations for improved body composition estimation in Indian adults medRxiv 2024 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000671 PMC12185013 40549720 · DOI
  50. [59]Guo J. He Q. She C. Liu H. Li Y. A machine learning–based online web calculator to aid in the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the US community Digit. Health 2024 10 1 14 10.1177/20552076241283247 PMC11445774 39360239 · DOI
  51. [60]Buccheri E. Dell’Aquila D. Russo M. Chiaramonte R. Vecchio M. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass in older adults can be estimated with a simple equation using a few zero-cost variables J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 2024 47 E149 E158 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000420 39079022 · DOI · Paper page
  52. [62]Kang Y.-J. Yoo J.-I. Ha Y. Sarcopenia feature selection and risk prediction using machine learning: A cross-sectional study Medicine 2019 98 e17699 10.1097/MD.0000000000017699 31651901 PMC6824801 · DOI
  53. [63]Du J. Tao X. Zhu L. Wang H. Qi W. Min X. Wei S. Zhang X. Liu Q. Development of a visualized risk prediction system for sarcopenia in older adults using machine learning: A cohort study based on CHARLS Front. Public Health 2025 13 1 8 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1544894 PMC11936879 40144970 · DOI
  54. [64]Li N. Ou J. He H. He J. Zhang L. Peng Z. Zhong J. Jiang N. Exploration of a machine learning approach for diagnosing sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults using sEMG-based data J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2024 21 69 10.1186/s12984-024-01369-y 38725065 PMC11080130 · DOI
  55. [65]Yang S. Yu J. Chen Q. Sun X. Hu Y. Su T. Li J. Jin L. Development and external validation of a machine-learning based model to predict pre-sarcopenia in MASLD population: Results from NHANES 2017–2018 Ann. Hepatol. 2024 30 101585 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101585 39374737 · DOI
  56. [66]Yu P. Zhang X. Sun G. Zeng P. Zheng C. Wang K. Sarcopenia prediction model based on machine learning and SHAP values for community-based older adults with cardiovascular disease in China Front. Public Health 2025 13 1527304 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527304 40469611 PMC12133505 · DOI
  57. [67]Johnson T. Su J. Andres J. Henning A. Ren J. Sex differences in fat distribution and muscle fat infiltration in the lower extremity: A Retrospective Diverse-Ethnicity 7T MRI Study in a Research Institute Setting in the USA Diagnostics 2024 14 2260 10.3390/diagnostics14202260 39451583 PMC11506611 · DOI
  58. [68]Fragala M.S. Clark M.H. Walsh S.J. Kleppinger A. Judge J.O. Kuchel G.A. Kenny A.M. Gender differences in anthropometric predictors of physical performance in older adults Gend. Med. 2012 9 445 456 10.1016/j.genm.2012.10.004 23123187 PMC3536819 · DOI
  59. [69]Chawla N.V. Bowyer K.W. Hall L.O. Kegelmeyer W.P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2002 16 321 357 10.1613/jair.953 · DOI · Paper page
  60. [70]Rajput D. Wang W.J. Chen C.C. Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications BMC Bioinform. 2023 24 48 10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9 36788550 PMC9926644 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [71]Vabalas A. Gowen E. Poliakoff E. Casson A.J. Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size PLoS ONE 2019 14 e0224365 10.1371/journal.pone.0224365 31697686 PMC6837442 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [72]Goldenholz D.M. Sun H. Ganglberger W. Westover M.B. Sample Size Analysis for Machine Learning Clinical Validation Studies Biomedicines 2023 11 685 10.3390/biomedicines11030685 36979665 PMC10045793 · DOI
  63. [73]Castillo-Olea C. Garcia-Zapirain Soto B. Zuñiga C. Evaluation of prevalence of the sarcopenia level using machine learning techniques: Case study in Tijuana Baja California, Mexico Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020 17 1917 10.3390/ijerph17061917 32183494 PMC7143671 · DOI
  64. [74]Pineda-Zuluaga M.C. González-Correa C.H. Sepulveda-Gallego L.E. Cut-off points for low skeletal muscle mass in older adults: Colombia versus other populations F1000Res 2022 11 304 10.12688/f1000research.109195.1 37638137 PMC10450257 · DOI
  65. [75]Abdalla P.P. Silva A.M. Venturini A.C.R. Santos A.P.D. Carvalho A.D.S. Siqueira V.A.A.A. Gomide E.B. Alves N.M.D.C. Ferriolli E. Machado D.R.L. Cut-off points of appendicular lean soft tissue for identifying sarcopenia in older adults in Brazil: A cross-sectional study Nutr. Hosp. 2020 37 306 312 10.20960/nh.02951 32124622 · DOI
  66. [76]Alwosheel A. van Cranenburgh S. Chorus C.G. Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis J. Choice Model. 2018 167 182 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  67. [79]Padilla C.J. Ferreyro F.A. Arnold W.D. Anthropometry as a readily accessible health assessment of older adults Exp. Gerontol. 2021 153 111464 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111464 34256113 · DOI
  68. [80]Turimov Mustapoevich D. Kim W. Machine learning applications in sarcopenia detection and management: A comprehensive survey Healthcare 2023 11 2483 10.3390/healthcare11182483 37761680 PMC10531485 · DOI
  69. [81]Wang B. Torriani M. Artificial intelligence in the evaluation of body composition Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2020 24 030 037 10.1055/s-0039-3400267 31991450 · DOI
  70. [82]Ozgur S. Altinok Y.A. Bozkurt D. Saraç Z.F. Akçiçek S.F. Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms for sarcopenia diagnosis in older adults Healthcare 2023 11 2699 10.3390/healthcare11192699 37830737 PMC10572141 · DOI
  71. [83]Hui A.T. Ahn S.S. Lye C.T. Deng J. Ethical challenges of artificial intelligence in health care: A narrative review EBEM 2021 12 55 71 10.1615/EthicsBiologyEngMed.2022041580 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González-Martin, A. M., Limón-Villegas, E. S., Reyes-Castillo, Z., Esparza-Ros, F., Hernández-Palma, L. A., Santillán-Rivera, M. S., Herrera-Amante, C. A., Ramos-García, C. O., & Righini, N.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Guadalajara (MX)
  • Instituto de Investigaciones en Comportamiento Alimentario y Nutrición (IICAN), Universidad de Guadalajara, Ciudad Guzmán 49000, Jalisco, Mexico
  • Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
Corresponding author
  • González-Martin, Ana M.
  • Righini, Nicoletta
Venue
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-07-17
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
276
ISSN
2411-5142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412650326
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Mexican Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación (Secihti) (864093)
  • Laboratorio de Evaluación y Cuidado del Estado Nutricio (LECEN) (864093)
  • Instituto de Investigaciones en Comportamiento Alimentario y Nutrición (IICAN) (864093)
  • Doctorado en Ciencia del Comportamiento con orientación en Alimentación y Nutrición (864093)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
sarcopenia, appendicular lean mass index, anthropometry, machine learning prediction, sarcopenia screening, older adults, body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, sex differences, low-cost diagnostics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review