Cited by 357Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Current Understanding and Burning Questions

Open access

Abstract

Candida albicans, along with other closely related Candida species, are the primary causative agents of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC)—a multifactorial infectious disease of the lower female reproductive tract resulting in pathologic inflammation. Unlike other forms of candidiasis, VVC is a disease of immunocompetent and otherwise healthy women, most predominant during their child-bearing years. While VVC is non-lethal, its high global incidence and profound negative impact on quality-of-life necessitates further understanding of the host and fungal factors that drive disease pathogenesis. In this review, we cover the current state of our understanding of the epidemiology, host response, fungal pathogenicity mechanisms, impact of the microbiome, and novel approaches to treatment of this most prevalent human candidal infection. We also offer insight into the latest advancements in the VVC field and identify important questions that still remain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jof6010027

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 148 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–356 of 356

Metadata

Authors
Willems, H. M. E., Ahmed, S. S., Liu, J., Xu, Z., & Peters, B. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Peters, Brian M.
Venue
Journal of Fungi
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-25
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
27
ISSN
2309-608X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007795453
Cited by
357
References
148
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 20
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Fungi (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI134796, AI141829)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
vaginal candidiasis, Candida species, host immune response, vaginal microbiota, antifungal therapy, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review