Cited by 11Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyAmphibian and Reptile Biology

An Improvement in Enclosure Design Can Positively Impact Welfare, Reduce Aggressiveness and Stabilise Hierarchy in Captive Galapagos Giant Tortoises

Open access
Fieschi-Méric, Léa, Ellis, Charlotte, Servini, Francesca, Tapley, Benjamin, Michaels, Christopher J.·2022·Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens

Abstract

The interest in the welfare of zoo animals, from both the public and the scientific community, has long been biased towards mammals. However, growing evidence of the complex behavioural repertoires of less charismatic animals, such as reptiles, reveals the necessity to better comply with their welfare needs in captivity. Here, we present the effects of an enclosure change towards a more natural habitat in captive Galapagos tortoises (Chelonoidis spp.) held at ZSL London Zoo. Using behavioural observations, we found that the tortoises habituated to their new enclosure in six days. This represents the first quantification of habituation latency to a new enclosure in a reptile model to our knowledge—which is important information to adapt policies governing animal moves. The tortoises expressed time budgets more similar to those of wild individuals after their transition to the new enclosure. Interestingly, the hierarchy between the individuals was inverted and more stable after this change in environment. The tortoises interacted less often, which led to a decrease in the frequency of agonistic encounters. We also found that higher ambient sound volume was associated with increased likelihood of interactions turning into fights. Taken together, our results demonstrate the potential of appropriate enclosure design to improve reptile welfare.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jzbg3040037

Cites

58 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increases in exhibit complexity and size have been shown to positively impact behavioral patterns in diverse taxa.

    “However, increases in exhibit complexity and size have been shown to positively impact behavioral patterns in diverse taxa.”

    From The Benefits of Increased Space and Habitat Complexity for the Welfare of Zoo-Housed King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says environmental enrichment and available space contribute to well-being across a wide range of animal taxa. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports improved welfare and reduced aggression after tortoises moved to a more resource-rich enclosure. The paper therefore supports the general benefit of larger, enriched exhibits, but its evidence for improved behavioral patterns is specific to tortoises, not diverse taxa. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cayot, L.J. Ecology of Giant Tortoises (Geochelone elephantopus) in the Galapagos Islands. Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA, 1987.
  2. Jackson, C.G.; Awbrey, F.T. Mating Bellows of the Galapagos Tortoise, Geochelone elephantopus. Herpetologica 1978, 34, 134-136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fieschi-Méric, L., Ellis, C., Servini, F., Tapley, B., & Michaels, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK
  • Zoological Society of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-09-28
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
499-512
ISSN
2673-5636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297476904
Cited by
11
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ReNewZoo PhD program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
Galápagos tortoise, Chelonoidis, reptile welfare, enclosure design, captive reptiles, time budget, social hierarchy, agonistic behavior, aggression, environmental sounds, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review