Cited by 197Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Assessment of welfare in zoo animals: towards optimum quality of life

Open access
Wolfensohn, Sarah, Shotton, Justine, Bowley, Hannah, Davies, Siân, Thompson, Sarah, Justice, William S. M.·2018·Animals

Abstract

Zoos are required to maintain a high standard of animal welfare, and this can be assessed using a combination of resource-based and animal-based indices usually divided into behavioural indicators, physiological indicators and clinical/pathological signs. Modern animal welfare assessments should aim to encompass positive affective states and the indicators that are useful in assessing these are discussed. When developing factors to be scored for each species, there is huge variability in the available information about the natural biology for some zoo species and even less information concerning those animals in captivity. Wild baselines are not always the most accurate indicator of what is right for an animal in captivity, which makes the identification of factors to include within species-specific welfare assessment even more challenging. When planning a welfare strategy for any species, it is important that the full range of their biological requirements and needs are considered, but this can be challenging for some zoo species and it is not possible to define a “one size fits all” welfare strategy. The different approaches for welfare assessment are reviewed, including the development of the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid which offers an evidence-based tool for continual welfare assessment, using technology where appropriate, to facilitate decision making and lead to improvements in the animals’ quality of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani8070110

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research across various zoo species has demonstrated that animals exhibit diverse behavioral traits that influence their responses to management practices.

    “Research across various zoo species has demonstrated that animals exhibit diverse behavioral traits that influence their responses to management practices [62,63].”

    From Socializing a group of male Asian elephants in a semi-captive facility in Lao PDR (2025) · cites this paper as [63]

    Section 4, “Behavioural Assessments” (no page supplied), says individual temperament may affect how zoo animals cope with captivity and that responses to stressors differ among individuals. It does not establish that research across various zoo species has demonstrated how behavioral traits influence responses to management practices; it says this has been more widely researched in farm animals and gives a captive-chimpanzee example. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For some species with special spatial, environmental, social, or cognitive needs, a one-size-fits-all strategy to assess welfare may not be appropriate; species-specific and if possible context-specific assessment tools are needed.

    “For some species with special spatial, environmental, social, or cognitive needs, a “one-size-fits-all” strategy to assess welfare may not be appropriate; rather, species-specific (25, 26) and if possible, context-specific assessment tools are needed.”
  • This review is the first overview of welfare assessment tools specific to elephants.

    “While there have been several reviews of animal welfare frameworks (24–26), to our knowledge, this is the first overview of welfare assessment tools specific to elephants.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]Honess P.E. Wolfensohn S.E. Welfare of Exotic Animals in Captivity Behaviour of Exotic Pets Valarie V.T. Wiley-Blackwell Hoboken, NJ, USA 2010
  2. [44]Webster J. Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye towards Eden Blackwell Science Oxford, UK 1994
  3. [55]Ivanov I.D. Djorbineva M.K. The influence of emotional reactivity over maternal behavior and lactating in dairy ewes Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Applied Ethology Halle, Germany 4–6 October 2001 115 118
  4. [97]Siegford J.M. Multidisciplinary Approaches and Assessment Techniques to Better Understand and Enhance Zoo Nonhuman Animal Welfare J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2014 16 300 318 10.1080/10888705.2013.827914 24079486 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfensohn, S., Shotton, J., Bowley, H., Davies, S., Thompson, S., & Justice, W. S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Marwell Zoo (GB)
Corresponding author
Wolfensohn, Sarah
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-07-04
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
110
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811324535
Cited by
197
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
zoo animal welfare, animal welfare assessment, quality of life, behavioural indicators, physiological parameters, clinical signs, positive affective states, welfare technology, captive animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review