Protected areas in the brazilian amazon threatened by cycles of property registration, cattle ranching, and deforestation
Open accessAbstract
Protected areas (PAs) in the Brazilian Amazon have proven to be critical in preserving the rainforest but face increasing threats. Since 2019, illegal activities and land conflicts involving PAs have escalated due to the weakening of environmental institutions. Therefore, up-to-date research is needed to evaluate agricultural pressures on PAs—including Sustainable Use Areas, Indigenous Territories, and Strictly Protected Areas—given its importance in driving deforestation in the Amazon, and to identify hotspots of concern. We analyzed property registration, deforestation, pasture expansion, and cattle transaction records within 158 PAs in the Brazilian state of Pará, which holds most of the remaining forest and the highest rates of deforestation. Our findings show that nearly a quarter of Pará’s 2019–2022 deforestation occurred within PAs, undermining their effectiveness as conservation tools. Despite prohibitions, we found illegally registered private properties in most PA categories including indigenous territories and over a 100% increase in deforestation within PAs from 2015–2018. Over 90% of PAs contained pasturelands in 2022, but only half of them had registered cattle transactions within their borders, which suggests the presence of clandestine cattle activities in these areas as well. Indirect sales to slaughterhouses coming from PAs increased during the study period, potentially due to efforts by ranchers to obscure such cattle origins from companies that are increasingly monitoring their direct suppliers. Finally, we identified 17 high-risk PAs concentrating most threats. Focusing monitoring efforts on property registries and cattle transactions in these areas could significantly reduce illegal deforestation and illegal cattle ranching. While PAs are considered to be cornerstones of forest conservation efforts, our findings show that current policies fail to prevent cycles of land grabbing, illegal ranching, and deforestation that can eventually lead to the downgrading, downsizing, and degazetting of PAs. Given this context, validating property claims, tracing cattle sales, and penalizing deforestation are urgently needed to halt these cycles that threaten PAs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Law enforcement in conservation areas is scant, and smallholders that embrace cattle openly ranch inside nature reserves and even Indigenous territories.
“Meanwhile, law enforcement in conservation areas is scant, and the smallholders that embrace cattle openly ranch inside nature reserves and even Indigenous territories (Coelho-Junior et al., 2022;Candino et al., 2024).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Candino et al., 2024
Cites
Collective property rights reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Baragwanath, K., & Bayi, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1917874117 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Protected areas still used to produce brazil’s cattle
West, T. A. P., Rausch, L., Munger, J., & Gibbs, H. K. (2022) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12916 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Candino, M., Brandão, A., Munger, J., Rausch, L., & Gibbs, H. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Candino, Malena
- Venue
- Land
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-06-21
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 901
- ISSN
- 2073-445X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399885193
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Land (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (72052722CA00002, 2106-036, 2110-118, 112440059)
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (72052722CA00002, 2106-036, 2110-118, 112440059)
- Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (72052722CA00002, 2106-036, 2110-118, 112440059)
- Bezos Earth Fund (72052722CA00002, 2106-036, 2110-118, 112440059)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- protected areas, Brazilian Amazon, deforestation, cattle ranching, property registration, land grabbing, indigenous territories, illegal deforestation, pasture expansion, Pará, conservation effectiveness, hot spots, environmental institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review