Cited by 16Digitalization, Law, and RegulationLegal and Social Justice StudiesCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

The Legal Challenges of Realistic and AI-Driven Child Sexual Abuse Material: Regulatory and Enforcement Perspectives in Europe

Open access
Parti, Katalin, Szabó, Judit·2024·Laws

Abstract

Although the escalation in online child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is not a novel problem, recent digital proliferation has brought about new alarming challenges in addressing the issue. CSAM poses significant risks to children and society in general, the most serious being the long-lasting harmful effects on depicted victims. The already distressing problem is exacerbated by the worldwide appearance and spread of AI-driven or virtual CSAM, as AI offers a fast and increasingly profitable means for the sexual exploitation of children. The paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current legislative measures focusing the European Union for combating online CSAM. With a particular focus on AI-driven CSAM, we will systematically evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of these regulations in addressing virtual CSAM. The paper will conclude with policy recommendations to address identified gaps in the European legislative framework concerning virtual CSAM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/laws13060067

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Time and resources required to verify whether material is real or synthetic delays responses to cases involving children experiencing ongoing or imminent abuse, diverting investigative focus and straining forensic units.

    “The time and resources required to verify whether material is real or synthetic delays responses to cases involving children experiencing ongoing or imminent abuse, diverting investigative focus, and placing additional strain on forensic units (IWF 2023; Parti and Szabó 2024; Thiel et al. 2023).”

    From AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? (2026) · cites this paper as Parti and Szabó 2024

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says virtual CSAM strains law enforcement and impedes the identification and protection of real child victims. It does not say that verifying whether material is real or synthetic delays responses to ongoing or imminent abuse, diverts investigative focus, or specifically strains forensic units. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Engagement with synthetic material lowers the psychological threshold for individuals to seek out more extreme content, increasing the risk of transitioning to real-world abuse.

    “There is increasing concern that engagement with synthetic material lowers the psychological threshold for individuals to seek out more extreme content, increasing the risk of transitioning to real-world abuse (Parti and Szabó 2024; Thiel et al. 2023).”

    From AI-generated child sexual abuse material: what’s the harm? (2026) · cites this paper as Parti and Szabó 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Atrey, Ishan. 2023. Cybercrime and its Legal Implications: Analysing the challenges and Legal frameworks surrounding Cybercrime, including issues related to Jurisdiction, Privacy, and Digital Evidence. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews 10: 183-97.
  2. Blackwell, Lindsay, Nicole Ellison, Natasha Elliott-Deflo, and Raz Schwartz. 2019. Harassment in social virtual reality: Challenges for platform governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3: 1-25.
  3. Broadhurst, Roderick. 2019. Child Sex Abuse Images and Exploitation Materials. In The Human Factor of Cybercrime. Edited by Rutger Leukfeldt and Thomas J. Holt. London: Routledge, pp. 310-36.
  4. Carrera, Sergio, and Elspeth Guild. 2014. The European Council's guidelines for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice 2020: Subverting the 'Lisbonisation' of Justice and Home Affairs? Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2476887 (accessed on 15 July 2024).
  5. Cauffman, Caroline, and Catalina Goanta. 2021. A New Order: The Digital Services Act and Consumer Protection. European Journal of Risk Regulation 12: 758-74.
  6. Cummins, R. Glenn. 2007. Pornography, x-rated movies. In Encyclopedia of Children, Adolescents, and the Media. Edited by Jeffrey Jensen Arnett. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, vol. 2, pp. 666-68.
  7. European Law Institute. 2023. ELI Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on Mutual Admissibility of Evidence and Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Draft Legislative Proposal. Available online: https://www.europeanlawinstitute.eu/ fileadmin/user_upload/p_eli/Publications/ELI_Proposal_for_a_Directive_on_Mutual_Admissibility_of_Evidence_and_Electronic_ Evidence_in_Criminal_Proceedings_in_the_EU.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2024).
  8. Frosio, Giancarlo, and Christophe Geiger. 2023. Taking fundamental rights seriously in the Digital Services Act's platform liability regime. European Law Journal 29: 31-77.
  9. CrossRef · DOI
  10. CrossRef · DOI
  11. Henseler, Hans, and Rens de Wolf. 2019. Sweetie 2.0 Technology: Technical Challenges of Making the Sweetie 2.0 Chatbot. In Sweetie 2.0: Using Artificial Intelligence To Fight Webcam Child Sex Tourism. Edited by Simone van der Hof, Ilina Georgieva, Bart Schermer and Bert-Jaap Koops. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 113-134.
  12. Johnson, Scott A. 2020. Child porn users & risk for engaging in contact offenses: Faulty data minimizes offender's risk & puts more children at risk for sexual abuse. Forensic Research and Criminology International Journal 8: 93-99.
  13. Koops, Bert-Jaap, and Eleni Kosta. 2018. Looking for some light through the lens of "cryptowar" history: Policy options for law enforcement authorities against "Going Dark". Computer Law and Security Review 34: 890-900.
  14. CrossRef · DOI
  15. Oerlemans, Jan-Jaap, and Maša Galič. 2022. Cybercrime investigations. In Essentials in Cybercrime. A Criminological Overview for Education and Practice. Edited by Wytske van der Wagen, Jan-Jaap Oerlemans and Marleen Weulen Kranenbarg. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, pp. 197-254.
  16. CrossRef · DOI
  17. Qin, Hua Xuan, Yuyang Wang, and Pan Hui. 2022. Identity, crimes, and law enforcement in the Metaverse. arXiv arXiv:2210.06134. · arXiv
  18. CrossRef · DOI
  19. Rezende, Izadora Neroni. 2024. The proposed regulation to fight online child sexual abuse: An appraisal of privacy, data protection and criminal justice issues. International Review of Law Computers & Technology 38: 369-90.
  20. Russell, Diana, and Natalie Purcell. 2008. Exposure to pornography as a cause of child sexual victimization. In Handbook of Children, Culture, and Violence. Edited by Nancy E. Dowd, Dorothy G. Singer and Robin Fretwell Wilson. New York: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 59-84.
  21. CrossRef · DOI
  22. Shuck, Brad. 2011. Integrative Literature Review: Four Emerging Perspectives of Employee Engagement. Human Resource Development Review 10: 304-28.
  23. Tesfay, Welderufael B., Peter Hofmann, Toru Nakamura, Shinsaku Kiyomoto, and Jetzabel Serna. 2018. PrivacyGuide: Towards an implementation of the EU GDPR on internet privacy policy evaluation. Paper presented at the Fourth ACM International Workshop on Security and Privacy Analytics, Tempe, AZ, USA, March 21.
  24. Tolbaru, Carmina-Elena. 2022. Fight against sexual abuse and online exploitation of children-key priority at the European Union level. International Journal of Legal and Social Order 1: 347-56.
  25. van Daalen, Ot. 2023. The right to encryption: Privacy as preventing unlawful access. Computer Law and Security Review 49: 105804.
  26. WeProtect Global Alliance. 2023. Alarming Escalation in Child Sexual Abuse Online Revealed by Global Threat Assessment 2023. Available online: https://www.weprotect.org/wp-content/uploads/Global-Threat-Asssesment-2023-Press-Release.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2024).
  27. Wilman, Folkert. 2022. The Digital Services Act (DSA)-An Overview. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=4304586 (accessed on 18 July 2024).
  28. Witting, Sabine K. 2021. Transnational by Default: Online Child Sexual Abuse Respects No Borders. International Journal of Children's Rights 29: 731-64.
  29. Witting, Sabine, and Mark Leiser. 2022. Expert Workshop on EU Proposed Regulation on Preventing and Combating Child Sexual Abuse. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/outcome-report-of-the-expert-workshop-on-eu-proposed-regulation-on-pre/1680aa00e4 (accessed on 21 June 2024).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parti, K., & Szabó, J.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • National Institute of Criminology (HU)
Corresponding author
Parti, Katalin
Venue
Laws
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-30
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
67
ISSN
2075-471X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403892238
Cited by
15
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
38.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Laws (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
child pornography, online child sexual exploitation, European Union law, regulatory enforcement, legal challenges, child protection, policy recommendations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review