Cited by 39Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnergy and Environment Impacts

Biochars from Post-Production Biomass and Waste from Wood Management: Analysis of Carbonization Products

Open access
Kosakowski, Wojciech, Bryszewska, Malgorzata Anita, Dziugan, Piotr·2020·Materials

Abstract

Waste biomass can be used as an alternative source of energy. However, such use requires prior treatment of the material. This paper describes the physicochemical characteristics of biochar obtained by the thermochemical decomposition of six types of agricultural waste biomass: residues from the production of flavored spirits (a pulp of lime, grapefruit and lemon), beetroot pulp, apple pomace, brewer’s spent grain, bark and municipal solid waste (bark, sawdust, off-cuts and wood chips). The biomass conversion process was studied under conditions of limited oxygen access in a reactor. The temperature was raised from 450 to 850 °C over 30 min, followed by a residence time of 60 min. The solid products were characterized in terms of their elemental compositions, mass, energy yield and ash content. The gaseous products from pyrolysis of the biomass were also analyzed and their compositions were characterized by GCMS (Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry). The carbonization process increased the carbon content by, on average, 1.7 times, from an average percentage of 46.09% ± 3.65% for biomass to an average percentage of 74.72% ± 5.36% for biochars. After carbonization, the biochars were found to have a net calorific value of between 27 and 32 MJ/kg, which is comparable or even higher than good-quality coal (eco pea coal 24–26 MJ/kg). The net calorific values show that the volatile products can also be considered as a valuable source of energy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma13214971

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, 800 °C carbonization achieves a stable, carbon-rich biochar with a quality porous structure, which is then further enhanced by activation at 900 °C.

    “Overall, 800 °C carbonization achieves a stable, carbon-rich biochar with a quality porous structure, which is then further enhanced by activation at 900 °C49.”

    From Metals incorporated agricultural waste corn Cob-based biochar used as an adsorbent for CO2 capturing (2025) · cites this paper as [49]

    Section 3.2 reports that carbonization increased the biochars’ carbon content, supporting the carbon-rich part of the claim. Section 2.5 specifies carbonization at 850 °C, not 800 °C, and the cited passages do not establish stability, a quality porous structure, or further enhancement by activation at 900 °C. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Wahid F.R.A.A. Harun N.H.H.M. Rashid S.R.M. Samad N.A.F.A. Saleh S. Physicochemical property changes and volatile analysis for torrefactionn of oil palm frond Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017 56 199 204

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosakowski, W., Bryszewska, M. A., & Dziugan, P.
Affiliations
  • Polmos Żyrardów Sp. z o.o., ul. Mickiewicza 1-3, 96-300 Żyrardów, Poland
  • Institute of Natural Products and Cosmetics, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Lodz University of Technology, ul. Stefanowskiego 4/10, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
  • Lodz University of Technology (PL)
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
13
Issue
21
Pages
4971
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097391368
Cited by
39
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
The Smart Growth Operational Programme (POIR.01.01.01-00-0374/4/17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
Keywords
biochar, biomass pyrolysis, agricultural waste, carbonization, calorific value, volatile products, carbon content, ash content, elemental composition, bioenergy, apple pomace, brewer's spent grain, bark, sawdust, municipal solid waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review