Cited by 145Topic ModelingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

Hallucination Mitigation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models: A Review

Open access
Zhang, Wan, Zhang, Jing·2025·Mathematics

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) leverages the strengths of information retrieval and generative models to enhance the handling of real-time and domain-specific knowledge. Despite its advantages, limitations within RAG components may cause hallucinations, or more precisely termed confabulations in generated outputs, driving extensive research to address these limitations and mitigate hallucinations. This review focuses on hallucination in retrieval-augmented large language models (LLMs). We first examine the causes of hallucinations from different sub-tasks in the retrieval and generation phases. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of corresponding hallucination mitigation techniques, offering a targeted and complete framework for addressing hallucinations in retrieval-augmented LLMs. We also investigate methods to reduce the impact of hallucination through detection and correction. Finally, we discuss promising future research directions for mitigating hallucinations in retrieval-augmented LLMs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/math13050856

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., & Zhang, J.
Affiliations
Southeast University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Jing
Venue
Mathematics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-03-04
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
856
ISSN
2227-7390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408145721
Cited by
145
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 35 · 2023: 1
FWCI
13.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (RF1028623059)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
hallucination mitigation, retrieval-augmented generation, large language models, confabulation, hallucination detection, hallucination correction, information retrieval, generative models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review