Cited by 10Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Candida albicans Strains Adapted to Caspofungin Due to Aneuploidy Become Highly Tolerant under Continued Drug Pressure

Open access
Husain, Farha, Yadav, Anshuman, Sah, Sudisht K., Hayes, Jeffrey J., Rustchenko, Elena·2022·Microorganisms

Abstract

Candida albicans is a prevalent fungal pathogen of humans. Understanding the development of decreased susceptibility to ECN drugs of this microbe is of substantial interest, as it is viewed as an intermediate step allowing the formation of FKS1 resistance mutations. We used six previously characterized mutants that decreased caspofungin susceptibility either by acquiring aneuploidy of chromosome 5 (Ch5) or by aneuploidy-independent mechanisms. When we exposed these caspofungin-adapted mutants to caspofungin again, we obtained 60 evolved mutants with further decreases in caspofungin susceptibility, as determined with CLSI method. We show that the initial adaptation to caspofungin is coupled with the adaptation to other ECNs, such as micafungin and anidulafungin, in mutants with no ploidy change, but not in aneuploid mutants, which become more susceptible to micafungin and anidulafungin. Furthermore, we find that the initial mechanism of caspofungin adaptation determines the pattern of further adaptation as parentals with no ploidy change further adapt to all ECNs by relatively small decreases in susceptibility, whereas aneuploid parentals adapt to all ECNs, primarily by large decrease in susceptibilities. Our data suggest that either distinct or common mechanisms can govern adaptation to different ECNs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/microorganisms11010023

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. albicans heteroresistance to echinocandins is also related to chr5, as chr5 aneuploidy after caspofungin exposure gave cross-resistance to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin.

    “It is also related to chr5, as chr5 aneuploidy after caspofungin exposure gave cross-resistance to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin [133].”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [133]

    Section 3.2 reports that mutants evolved from Ch5-aneuploid parents under further caspofungin exposure showed increased MICs to caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin. But Section 3.1 says the initial Ch5-aneuploid mutants were more susceptible to micafungin and anidulafungin. The claim omits the essential further-exposure step and calls the resulting tolerance cross-resistance. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C. albicans chr5 aneuploidy caused by caspofungin exposure can result in cross-resistance to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin.

    “For example, C. albicans chr5 aneuploidy caused by caspofungin exposure can result in cross-resistance to caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin [133]”

    From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Conclusions report that C. albicans mutants with chromosome 5 aneuploidy predominantly acquired high tolerance to all three echinocandins after further caspofungin exposure. But Section 3.1 says the initially adapted aneuploid mutants were more susceptible to micafungin and anidulafungin. The claim omits the further-exposure condition and calls the observed tolerance cross-resistance, which the paper distinguishes from clinical resistance. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husain, F., Yadav, A., Sah, S. K., Hayes, J. J., & Rustchenko, E.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Rustchenko, Elena
Venue
Microorganisms
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-21
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
23
ISSN
2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313574148
Cited by
10
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AI141884, R01GM052426)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
Candida albicans, caspofungin, echinocandin resistance, aneuploidy, chromosome 5, FKS1 mutations, micafungin, anidulafungin, antifungal resistance, drug tolerance, fungal adaptation, antifungal susceptibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review