The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment Strategies for Infected Wounds
Open accessAbstract
The treatment of skin wounds is a key research domain owing to the important functional and aesthetic role of this tissue. When the skin is impaired, bacteria can soon infiltrate into underlying tissues which can lead to life-threatening infections. Consequently, effective treatments are necessary to deal with such pathological conditions. Recently, wound dressings loaded with antimicrobial agents have emerged as viable options to reduce wound bacterial colonization and infection, in order to improve the healing process. In this paper, we present an overview of the most prominent antibiotic-embedded wound dressings, as well as the limitations of their use. A promising, but still an underrated group of potential antibacterial agents that can be integrated into wound dressings are natural products, especially essential oils. Some of the most commonly used essential oils against multidrug-resistant microorganisms, such as tea tree, St. John’s Wort, lavender and oregano, together with their incorporation into wound dressings are presented. In addition, another natural product that exhibits encouraging antibacterial activity is honey. We highlight recent results of several studies carried out by researchers from different regions of the world on wound dressings impregnated with honey, with a special emphasis on Manuka honey. Finally, we highlight recent advances in using nanoparticles as platforms to increase the effect of pharmaceutical formulations aimed at wound healing. Silver, gold, and zinc nanoparticles alone or functionalized with diverse antimicrobial compounds have been integrated into wound dressings and demonstrated therapeutic effects on wounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting wound healing
Guo, S., & DiPietro, L. A. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359125 · Cited by 5,792
The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future
Wang, L., Hu, C., & Shao, L. (2017) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s121956 · Cited by 4,062
Collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing
Chattopadhyay, S., & Raines, R. T. (2014) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.22486 · Cited by 1,041
Cited by
Rational Design of Immunomodulatory Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing
Kharaziha, M., Baidya, A., & Annabi, N. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202100176 · Cited by 721
Nanomaterials for Wound Healing and Infection Control
Mihai, M. M., Dima, M. B., Dima, B., & Holban, A. M. (2019) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma12132176 · Cited by 448
Progress in Hydrogels for Skin Wound Repair
Qi, L., Zhang, C., Wang, B., Yin, J., & Yan, S. (2022) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202100475 · Cited by 267
Biofilm-Innate Immune Interface: Contribution to Chronic Wound Formation
Versey, Z., da Cruz Nizer, W. S., Russell, E., Zigic, S., DeZeeuw, K. G., Marek, J. E., Overhage, J., & Cassol, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.648554 · Cited by 253
Bacterial Biofilm in Chronic Wounds and Possible Therapeutic Approaches
Cavallo, I., Sivori, F., Mastrofrancesco, A., Abril, E., Pontone, M., Di Domenico, E. G., & Pimpinelli, F. (2024) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology13020109 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Negut, I., Grumezescu, V., & Grumezescu, A. M.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-09-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2392
- ISSN
- 1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2891844341
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment Strategies for Infected Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules23092392
- The paper
- Negut, I., Grumezescu, V., & Grumezescu, A. M. (2018). Treatment Strategies for Infected Wounds. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.