Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 182 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agro-Food Byproducts as a New Source of Natural Food Additives

Open access
Faustino, Margarida, Veiga, Mariana, Sousa, Pedro, Costa, Eduardo M., Silva, Sara, Pintado, Manuela·2019·Molecules

Abstract

Nowadays, the agro-food industry generates high amounts of byproducts that may possess added value compounds with high functionality and/or bioactivity. Additionally, consumers’ demand for healthier foodstuffs has increased over the last years, and thus the food industry has strived to answer this challenge. Byproducts are generally secondary products derived from primary agro-food production processes and represent an interesting and cheaper source of potentially functional ingredients, such as peptides, carotenoids, and phenolic compounds, thus promoting a circular economy concept. The existing body of work has shown that byproducts and their extracts may be successfully incorporated into foodstuffs, for instance, phenolic compounds from eggplant can be potentially used as a mulfitunctional food additive with antimicrobial, antioxidant, and food colorant properties. As such, the aim of this review is to provide insights into byproducts and their potential as new sources of foodstuffs additives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules24061056

Cites

182 of 182 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 182 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Sathivel, 2004, Properties of Protein Powders from Arrowtooth Flounder (Atheresthes stomias) and Herring (Clupea harengus) Byproducts, J. Agric. Food Chem., 52, 5040, 10.1021/jf0351422 · doi:10.1021/jf0351422
  2. Sendra, 2009, Preparation of dietary fiber powder from tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) milk (“Horchata”) byproducts and its physicochemical properties, J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 7719, 10.1021/jf901687r · doi:10.1021/jf901687r
  3. Peters, 1986, M. Hanssen und J. Marschen: E for Additives. 223 Seiten. Thorsons Publishers Limited, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire. 1984. Preis: 2.95 £, Food Nahr., 30, 204, 10.1002/food.19860300225 · doi:10.1002/food.19860300225
  4. Saltmarsh, 2015, Recent trends in the use of food additives in the United Kingdom, J. Sci. Food Agric., 95, 649, 10.1002/jsfa.6715 · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6715
  5. Dabbou, 2016, Phytochemical compounds from the crop byproducts of Tunisian globe artichoke cultivars, Chem. Biodivers., 13, 1475, 10.1002/cbdv.201600046 · doi:10.1002/cbdv.201600046
  6. Gapor, 1986, Tocopherol content in oil palm leaflet, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 63, 330, 10.1007/BF02546040 · doi:10.1007/bf02546040
  7. Gherezgihier, 2017, Food additives: Functions, effects, regulations, approval and safety evaluation, J. Acad. Ind. Res., 6, 62
  8. Millstone, 2007, A. Larry Branen, P. Michael Davidson, Seppe Salminen and John H. ThorngateIII (editors). Food Additives, 2nd ed. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc.. 2001. US$225. pp. XV + 938, ISBN 0 8247 9343 9, Br. J. Nutr., 89, 157, 10.1079/BJN2002755 · doi:10.1079/bjn2002755
  9. Lück, E., and Jager, M. (1997). Antimicrobial Food Additives: Characteristics, Uses, Effects, Springer Science & Business Media. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59202-7
  10. Abdulmumeen, 2012, Food: Its preservatives, additives and applications, Int. J. Pharm. Chem. Biol. Sci., 1, 36
  11. Smith, J., and Hong-Shum, L. (2011). Food Additives Data Book, John Wiley & Sons. · doi:10.1002/9781444397741
  12. Li, C., Li, X., Bai, C., Zhang, Y., and Wang, Z. (2018). A chitinase with antifungal activity from naked oat (Avena chinensis) seeds. J. Food Biochem., e12713. · doi:10.1111/jfbc.12713
  13. Correa, P. (2018). Diet and gastric cancer. Diet, Nutrition and Cancer: A Critical Evaluation, CRC Press. · doi:10.1201/9781351071406-1
  14. Wu, 2015, Binding properties and structure–affinity relationships of food antioxidant butylated hydroxyanisole and its metabolites with lysozyme, Food Chem., 188, 370, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.013 · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.013
  15. Ryder, 2015, Characterisation of novel fungal and bacterial protease preparations and evaluation of their ability to hydrolyse meat myofibrillar and connective tissue proteins, Food Chem., 172, 197, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.061 · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.061
  16. Caleja, 2015, Development of a functional dairy food: Exploring bioactive and preservation effects of chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.), J. Funct. Foods, 16, 114, 10.1016/j.jff.2015.04.033 · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2015.04.033
  17. Bajaj, 2006, Effect of incorporation of mint on texture, colour and sensory parameters of biscuits, Int. J. Food Prop., 9, 691, 10.1080/10942910600547632 · doi:10.1080/10942910600547632
  18. 2014, Food coloring: The natural way, Res. J. Chem. Sci., 2231, 606X
  19. Vojdani, 2015, Immune reactivity to food coloring, Altern. Ther., 21, 1
  20. Mérillon, J.-M., and Ramawat, K.G. (2017). Natural Food Pigments and Colorants. Bioactive Molecules in Food, Springer International Publishing.
  21. Joshi, 2007, Low calorie biscuits from banana peel pulp, J. Solid Waste Technol. Manag., 33, 142
  22. Crizel, 2014, Orange fiber as a novel fat replacer in lemon ice cream, J. Food Sci. Technol., 34, 332, 10.1590/fst.2014.0057 · doi:10.1590/fst.2014.0057
  23. Radi, 2009, Physicochemical, Textural and Sensory Properties of Low-Fat Yogurt Produced by Using Modified Wheat Starch as a Fat Replacer, J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9, 2194
  24. Raftani, 2013, Effect of maltodextrin as a fat replacer on the quality of non-fat yogurt, J. Food Res., 23, 133
  25. Guerrero García Ortega, M., Riballo Ruiz-Roso, M., and Crespo Bermejo, A. (2017). Obtaining enriched fried tomato sauce using tomato byproducts. Proceedings of the XIV International Symposium on Processing Tomato 1159, ISHS. · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2017.1159.25
  26. Nussinovitch, A., and Hirashima, M. (2018). More Cooking Innovations: Novel Hydrocolloids for Special Dishes, CRC Press. · doi:10.1201/9781315111971
  27. Lee, 2009, Flavor and texture attributes of foods containing β-glucan-rich hydrocolloids from oats, LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 42, 350, 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.04.004 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2008.04.004
  28. Sady, 2006, Rheological properties and texture of yoghurts when oat-maltodextrin is used as a fat substitute, Int. J. Food Prop., 9, 1, 10.1080/10942910600588776 · doi:10.1080/10942910600588776
  29. Ralla, 2018, Oat bran extract (Avena sativa L.) from food by-product streams as new natural emulsifier, Food Hydrocoll., 81, 253, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.035 · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.02.035
  30. Aryana, 2007, Fat-free plain yogurt manufactured with inulins of various chain lengths and Lactobacillus acidophilus, J. Food Sci., 72, M79, 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00302.x · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00302.x
  31. Sahan, 2008, Physical, chemical and flavour quality of non-fat yogurt as affected by a β-glucan hydrocolloidal composite during storage, Food Hydrocoll., 22, 1291, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.06.010 · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.06.010
  32. 2004, Flow and creep compliance properties of reduced-fat yoghurts containing protein-based fat replacers, Int. Dairy J., 14, 777, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.02.012 · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.02.012
  33. Lin, 2016, Fortification of milk protein content with different dairy protein powders alters its compositional, rennet gelation, heat stability and ethanol stability characteristics, Int. Dairy J., 61, 220, 10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.06.010 · doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2016.06.010
  34. Bruzantin, 2016, Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of fat-free goat milk yogurt with added stabilizers and skim milk powder fortification, J. Dairy Sci., 99, 3316, 10.3168/jds.2015-10327 · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10327
  35. Brisson, 2008, The milk fat globule membrane as an ingredient: Why, how, when?, Dairy Sci. Technol., 88, 5, 10.1051/dst:2007005 · DOI
  36. Mistry, 1996, Use of Ultrafiltered Sweet Buttermilk in the Manufacture of Reduced Fat Cheddar Cheese 1, J. Dairy Sci., 79, 1137, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76467-6 · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76467-6
  37. Kinsella, 1982, Relationships between structure and functional properties of food proteins, Food Proteins, 1, 51
  38. Yavuz, 2018, The Effect of Some Chemical Additives on the Foaming Performance of the Pasteurized Liquid Egg White, J. Nutr. Metab., 5, 1054
  39. Johnson, 1981, Ultrastructural examination of egg albumen protein foams, J. Food Sci., 46, 1237, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb03030.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb03030.x
  40. Karayannakidis, 2016, Fish processing by-products as a potential source of gelatin: A review, J. Aquat. Food Prod. Technol., 25, 65, 10.1080/10498850.2013.827767 · doi:10.1080/10498850.2013.827767
  41. Kotlar, 2013, Improvement of functional and antimicrobial properties of brewery byproduct hydrolysed enzymatically, LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 50, 378, 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2012.09.005
  42. Whitehurst, R.J. (2008). Emulsifiers in Food Technology, John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Faustino, M., Veiga, M., Sousa, P., Costa, E. M., Silva, S., & Pintado, M.
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-18
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1056
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921081654
Cited by
361
References
182
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/Multi/50016/2013, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016403)
  • Agência Nacional de Inovação (17819)
  • European Regional Development Fund (PDR2020-101-030775)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agro-Food Byproducts as a New Source of Natural Food Additives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/molecules24061056
The paper
Faustino, M., Veiga, M., Sousa, P., Costa, E. M., Silva, S., & Pintado, M. (2019). Agro-Food Byproducts as a New Source of Natural Food Additives. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.