Cited by 14Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryWound Healing and TreatmentsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Design of Liposomes Carrying HelixComplex Snail Mucus: Preliminary Studies

Open access
Alogna, Andrea, Gentili, Valentina, Trapella, Claudio, Hallan, Supandeep Singh, Sguizzato, Maddalena, Strazzabosco, Giovanni, Fernández, Mercedes, Cortesi, Rita +2 more·2021·Molecules

Abstract

In recent decades liposomes have been used in different field thanks to their ability to act as a vehicle for a wide range of biomolecules, their great versatility and their easy production. The aim of this study was to evaluate liposomes as a vehicle for the actives present in the HelixComplex (HC) snail mucus for topical delivery. Liposomes composed of a mixture of phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and octadecylamine were prepared with and without HC (empty liposomes) and their biological efficacy was tested by evaluating cell viability and migration. HC-loaded liposomes (LHC) were stable throughout 60 days of observation, and showed interesting effects on wound healing reconstitution. In particular, we observed that 25 µg/mL LHC were already able to induce a higher cell monolayer reconstitution in comparison to the untreated samples and HC treated samples after only 4 h (28% versus 10% and 7%, p = 0.03 and p= 0.003, respectively). The effect was more evident at 24 h in comparison with the untreated control (54% versus 21.2% and 41.6%, p = 0.006 and p = NS, respectively). These results represent a preliminary, but promising, novelty in the delivery strategy of the actives present in the HelixComplex mucus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules26164709

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies confirm better local bioavailability of snail mucus in liposomes.

    “In addition, there are studies that confirm a better local bioavailability of snail mucus in liposomes [101], which can be a strong pharmaceutical factor in the development of investigational medicinal products of snail mucus for topical application.”

    From Chemical Variability and Biological Potential of Cornu aspersum Mucus as a Source for the Development of New Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical Products (2025) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Results and Discussion (§3.3) report better tissue-repair activity when snail mucus was loaded in liposomes than when it was applied alone. But the Conclusions (§4) describe improved cellular uptake as a proposed explanation and say in vivo tissue distribution still needs confirmation. The study supports improved in vitro activity, not a confirmed improvement in local bioavailability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Alogna, 2017, New Frontiers in Snail Mucus Studies for Cosmetic and Pharmaceutical preparations, Cosmetiscope, 973, 479

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alogna, A., Gentili, V., Trapella, C., Hallan, S. S., Sguizzato, M., Strazzabosco, G., Fernández, M., Cortesi, R., Rizzo, R., & Bortolotti, D.
Affiliations
University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Alogna, Andrea
  • Cortesi, Rita
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-08-04
Volume
26
Issue
16
Pages
4709
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189682058
Cited by
14
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • PON “Research and Innovation” 2014-2020 (ARS01_01163)
  • University of Ferrara (FAR2020, FAR2019)
  • Chamber of Commerce of Ferrara (CCIAA2018, CCIAA2019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
liposomes, snail mucus, topical drug delivery, wound healing, cell migration, cell viability, phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, octadecylamine, liposome stability
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Fibroblasts, Freeze Fracturing, Humans, Lipids, Liposomes, Mucus, Snails, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Wound Healing, Cell Death

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review