Cited by 24Tactile and Sensory InteractionsSpatial Cognition and NavigationDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Comparing Map Learning between Touchscreen-Based Visual and Haptic Displays: A Behavioral Evaluation with Blind and Sighted Users

Open access
Palani, Hari Prasath, Fink, Paul D. S., Giudice, Nicholas A.·2021·Multimodal Technologies and Interaction

Abstract

The ubiquity of multimodal smart devices affords new opportunities for eyes-free applications for conveying graphical information to both sighted and visually impaired users. Using previously established haptic design guidelines for generic rendering of graphical content on touchscreen interfaces, the current study evaluates the learning and mental representation of digital maps, representing a key real-world translational eyes-free application. Two experiments involving 12 blind participants and 16 sighted participants compared cognitive map development and test performance on a range of spatio-behavioral tasks across three information-matched learning-mode conditions: (1) our prototype vibro-audio map (VAM), (2) traditional hardcopy-tactile maps, and (3) visual maps. Results demonstrated that when perceptual parameters of the stimuli were matched between modalities during haptic and visual map learning, test performance was highly similar (functionally equivalent) between the learning modes and participant groups. These results suggest equivalent cognitive map formation between both blind and sighted users and between maps learned from different sensory inputs, providing compelling evidence supporting the development of amodal spatial representations in the brain. The practical implications of these results include empirical evidence supporting a growing interest in the efficacy of multisensory interfaces as a primary interaction style for people both with and without vision. Findings challenge the long-held assumption that blind people exhibit deficits on global spatial tasks compared to their sighted peers, with results also providing empirical support for the methodological use of sighted participants in studies pertaining to technologies primarily aimed at supporting blind users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/mti6010001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VAMs use the phone's native vibration motor and audio output to render oriented haptic lines with audio information that together have been shown to aid in cognitive map development.

    “Leveraging design guidelines for smartphone-based implementation [20], VAMs use the phone's native vibration motor and audio output capabilities to render oriented haptic lines with audio information that together have been shown to aid in cognitive map development [19].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 24

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Bourne, R.R.; Adelson, J.; Flaxman, S.; Briant, P.; Bottone, M.; Vos, T.; Naidoo, K.; Braithwaite, T.; Cicinelli, M.; Jonas, J. Global Prevalence of Blindness and Distance and Near Vision Impairment in 2020: Progress towards the Vision 2020 targets and what the future holds. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 2317.
  2. Giudice, N.A.; Palani, H.; Brenner, E.; Kramer, K.M. Learning Non-Visual Graphical Information using a Touch-Based Vibro-Audio Interface. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets'12), Boulder, CO, USA, 22-24 October 2012; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 103-110.
  3. Tennison, J.L.; Gorlewicz, J.L. Non-visual Perception of Lines on a Multimodal Touchscreen Tablet. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2019, 16, 1-19. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  4. Tennison, J.L.; Carril, Z.S.; Giudice, N.A.; Gorlewicz, J.L. Comparing graphical pattern matching on tablets and phones: Large screens are not necessarily better. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2018, 95, 720-726. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Poppinga, B.; Magnusson, C.; Pielot, M.; Rassmus-Gröhn, K. TouchOver map: Audio-tactile exploration of interactive maps. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Lisbon, Portugal, 7-10 September 2010; ACM: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011; pp. 545-550.
  6. Palani, H.P.; Giudice, U.; Giudice, N.A. Evaluation of Non-visual Zooming Operations on Touchscreen Devices. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI), Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, CA, USA, 17-22 July 2016;
  7. Grussenmeyer, W.; Garcia, J.; Jiang, F. Feasibility of using haptic directions through maps with a tablet and smart watch for people who are blind and visually impaired. In MobileHCI'16; ACM: Florence, Italy, 2016; pp. 83-89.
  8. Rowell, J.; Ungar, S. The world of touch: An international survey of tactile maps. Part 1: Production. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 2003, 21, 98-104. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Rowell, J.; Ungar, S. The world of touch: An international survey of tactile maps. Part 2: Design. Br. J. Vis. Impair. 2003, 21, 105-110. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Johnson, K.O.; Phillips, J.R. Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. J. Neurophysiol. 1981, 46, 1177-1191. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  11. Loomis, J.M.; Lederman, S.J. Tactual perception. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance; Boff, K., Kaufman, L., Thomas, J., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume 2, p. 31.
  12. Jones, L.A.; Sarter, N.B. Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Hum. Factors 2008, 50, 90-111. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Loomis, J.M. Tactile pattern perception. Perception 1981, 10, 5-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Lederman, S.J.; Klatzky, R.L.; Barber, P.O. Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1985, 114, 33-49. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. O'Modhrain, S.; Giudice, N.A.; Gardner, J.A.; Legge, G.E. Designing media for visually-impaired users of refreshable touch displays: Possibilities and pitfalls. IEEE Trans. Haptics 2015, 8, 248-257. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lederman, S.; Klatzky, R. Haptic perception: A tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2009, 71, 1439-1459. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  17. Palani, H.P.; Fink, P.D.S.; Giudice, N.A. Design Guidelines for Schematizing and Rendering Haptically Perceivable Graphical Elements on Touchscreen Devices. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 1393-1414. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  18. Bentzen, B.L. Orientation maps for visually impaired persons. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 1977, 71, 193-196. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Andrews, S.K. Spatial cognition through tactual maps. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Handicapped, Washington, DC, USA, 10-12 March 1983;
  20. Wiedel, J., Ed.; Association of American Geographers: Washington, DC, USA, 1983; pp. 30-40.
  21. Thinus-Blanc, C.; Gaunet, F. Representation of space in blind persons: Vision as a spatial sense? Psychol. Bull. 1997, 121, 20-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  22. Schinazi, V.R.; Thrash, T.; Chebat, D.R. Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2016, 7, 37-58. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  23. Giudice, N.A.; Long, R.G. Establishing and Maintaining Orientation: Tools, Techniques, and Technologies. In Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, 4th ed.; APH Press: Louisville, KY, USA, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 45-62.
  24. Montello, D.R. Navigation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking;
  25. Golledge, R.G. Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1999; pp. 5-45.
  26. O'Keefe, J.; Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1978.
  27. Golledge, R.G.; Klatzky, R.L.; Loomis, J.M. Cognitive mapping and wayfinding by adults without vision. In The Construction of Cognitive Maps; Portugali, J., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996; pp. 215-246.
  28. Millar, S. Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1994.
  29. Parkes, D. "NOMAD": An audio-tactile tool for the acquisition, use and management of spatially distributed information by partially sighted and blind persons. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for Visually Handicapped People, London, UK, 20-22 April 1988; pp. 54-64.
  30. Ducasse, J.; Brock, A.; Jouffrais, C. Accessible Interactive Maps for Visually Impaired Users. In Mobility of Visually Impaired People; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 537-584.
  31. Brock, A.; Jouffrais, C. Interactive audio-tactile maps for visually impaired people. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 2015, 113, 3-12. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Holmes, E.; Jansson, G.; Jansson, A. Exploring auditorily enhanced tactile maps for travel in new environments. New Technol. Educ. Vis. Handicap. 1996, 237, 191-196.
  33. Kane, S.K.; Morris, M.R.; Wobbrock, J.O. Touchplates: Low-cost tactile overlays for visually impaired touch screen users. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, Bellevue, WA, USA, 21-23 October 2013; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 1-8.
  34. Simonnet, M.; Vieilledent, S.; Tisseau, J.; Jacobson, D. Comparing Tactile Maps and Haptic Digital Representations of a Maritime Environment. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 2011, 105, 222-234. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Kaklanis, N.; Votis, K.; Tzovaras, D. Open Touch/Sound Maps: A system to convey street data through haptic and auditory feedback. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 57, 59-67. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Zeng, L.; Weber, G.H. Exploration of Location-Aware You-Are-Here Maps on a Pin-Matrix Display. IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 2016, 46, 88-100. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2004, 122, 477-485. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  38. Rosenbaum, P.; Stewart, D. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICIDH-2); The World Health Organiza- tion: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004; Volume 11, pp. 5-10.
  39. Sears, A.; Hanson, V. Representing users in accessibility research. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 2012, 4, 1-6. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  40. Shneiderman, B.; Plaisant, C.; Cohen, M.; Jacobs, S. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th ed.; Addison Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2009.
  41. Rieser, J.J.; Lockman, J.J.; Pick, H.L., Jr. The role of visual experience in knowledge of spatial layout. Percept. Psychophys. 1980, 28, 185-190. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Passini, R.; Proulx, G. Wayfinding without vision: An experiment with congenitally, totally blind people. Environ. Behav. 1988, 20, 227-252. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Sadalla, E.K.; Burroughs, W.J.; Staplin, L.J. Reference points in spatial cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. 1980, 6, 516-528. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Palani, H.P.; Tennison, J.L.; Giudice, G.B.; Giudice, N.A. Touchscreen-based haptic information access for assisting blind and visually-impaired users: Perceptual parameters and design guidelines. In Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology, Part of the International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE'18); Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 798, pp. 837-847.
  45. Palani, H.P.; Giudice, G.B.; Giudice, N.A. Haptic Information Access on Touchscreen devices: Guidelines for accurate perception and judgment of line orientation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 15-20 July 2018; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 243-255.
  46. Tobler, W.R. Bidimensional regression. Geogr. Anal. 1994, 26, 187-212. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Friedman, A.; Kohler, B. Bidimensional regression: Assessing the configural similarity and accuracy of cognitive maps and other two-dimensional data sets. Psychol Methods 2003, 8, 468-491. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Schinazi, V.R.; Epstein, R.A. Neural correlates of real-world route learning. NeuroImage 2010, 53, 725-735. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Montello, D.R., Ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 260-288.
  50. Palani, H.P.; Giudice, N.A. Evaluation of non-visual panning operations using touch-screen devices. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS'14), Rochester, NY, USA, 21-22 October 2014; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 293-294.
  51. Su, J.; Rosenzweig, A.; Goel, A.; de Lara, D.; Truong, K.N. Timbremap: Enabling the visually-impaired to use maps on touch-enabled devices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, Lisboa, Portugal, 7-10 September 2010; pp. 17-26. Available online: https://www.eecg.utoronto.ca/~{}ashvin/ publications/timbermap.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021).
  52. Loomis, J.M.; Lippa, Y.; Golledge, R.G.; Klatzky, R.L. Spatial updating of locations specified by 3-d sound and spatial language. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2002, 28, 335-345. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Kalia, A.; Legge, G.E.; Giudice, N.A. Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: The effects of visual impairment and age. Perception 2008, 37, 1677-1699. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Bryant, K.J. Representing space in language and perception. Mind Lang. 1997, 12, 239-264. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Palani, H. P., Fink, P. D. S., & Giudice, N. A.
Affiliations
  • UNAR Labs, Portland, ME 04102, USA
  • University of Maine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Palani, Hari Prasath
  • Giudice, Nicholas A.
Venue
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-22
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
2414-4088 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200139090
Cited by
24
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Multimodal Technologies and Interaction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CHS-#1425337)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
map learning, haptic display, touch screen interface, blind users, visually impaired users, tactile maps, multisensory interfaces, spatial cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review