Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 76Iron Metabolism and DisordersVitamin D Research StudiesAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Association between Iron and Vitamin D Status in Female Elite Athletes

Open access
Malczewska-Lenczowska, Jadwiga, Sitkowski, Dariusz, Surała, Olga, Orysiak, Joanna, Szczepańska, Beata, Witek, Konrad·2018·Nutrients

Abstract

Vitamin D may influence iron metabolism and erythropoiesis, whereas iron is essential for vitamin D synthesis. We examined whether vitamin D deficiencies (VDD) are associated with reduced iron status and whether progressive iron deficiency (ID) is accompanied by inferior vitamin D status. The study included 219 healthy female (14–34 years old) athletes. VDD was defined as a 25(OH)D concentration < 75 nmol/L. ID was classified based on ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), total iron binding capacity (TIBC) and blood morphology indices. The percentage of ID subjects was higher (32%) in the VDD group than in the 25(OH)D sufficient group (11%) (χ2 = 10.6; p = 0.001). The percentage of VDD subjects was higher (75%) in the ID than in the normal iron status group (48%) (χ2 = 15.6; p = 0.001). The odds ratios (ORs) for VDD increased from 1.75 (95% CI 1.02–2.99; p = 0.040) to 4.6 (95% CI 1.81–11.65; p = 0.001) with progressing iron deficiency. ID was dependent on VDD in both VDD groups (25(OH)D < 75 and < 50 nmol/L). The ID group had a lower 25(OH)D concentration (p = 0.000). The VDD group had lower ferritin (p = 0.043) and iron (p = 0.004) concentrations and higher values of TIBC (p = 0.016) and sTfR (p = 0.001). The current results confirm the association between vitamin D and iron status in female athletes, although it is difficult to assess exactly which of these nutrients exerts a stronger influence over the other.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

In 219 healthy female elite athletes, vitamin D deficiency and iron deficiency were mutually associated, with iron deficiency more common in vitamin D-deficient athletes and vitamin D deficiency more common in iron-deficient athletes. The authors conclude that iron deficiency may exert a stronger influence on vitamin D status than vice versa, though the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference.

Key findings

  • Among 219 female athletes, 54.3% had 25(OH)D <75 nmol/L (1.8% <25 nmol/L); total iron deficiency was 23.3% (low iron stores 7.3%, latent ID 15.1%, iron deficiency anemia 0.9%).
  • Iron deficiency was present in 32% of vitamin D-deficient (<75 nmol/L) athletes vs 11% of vitamin D-sufficient athletes (χ² = 10.6; p = 0.001); vitamin D deficiency was present in 75% of iron-deficient vs 48% of normal-iron-status athletes (χ² = 15.6; p = 0.001).
  • Odds ratios for vitamin D deficiency increased with progressive iron deficiency, from 1.75 (95% CI 1.02–2.99; p = 0.040) at ferritin <30 µg/L to 4.6 (95% CI 1.81–11.65; p = 0.001) in latent ID/IDA; ORs for iron deficiency were 3.14 (95% CI 1.56–6.31; p = 0.001) for 25(OH)D <75 nmol/L and 3.18 (95% CI 1.09–9.26; p = 0.030) for <50 nmol/L.
  • Iron-deficient athletes had lower mean 25(OH)D (p = 0.000); vitamin D-deficient athletes had lower ferritin (p = 0.043) and iron (p = 0.004) and higher TIBC (p = 0.016) and sTfR (p = 0.001).

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study: initially 231 female professional athletes from seven sports (volleyball, handball, rowing, canoe sprint, cycling, speed skating, taekwondo); 12 excluded for acute phase reaction markers, leaving 219 healthy females aged 14–34. Blood was drawn once at various training phases/seasons; 51% were examined April–September.
  • Blood assays: 25(OH)D by ELISA; ferritin by immunoturbidimetric method; iron and UIBC spectrophotometrically; TIBC calculated; sTfR by immunoenzymatic kits; morphology on ADVIA 120. Iron deficiency stages used ferritin <16 µg/L, sTfR >8.3 mg/L, TIBC >390 µg/dL, and anemia thresholds Hb <120 g/L, HCT <37%, RBC <4.2 × 10¹²/L.
  • Statistics: chi-square tests; multivariate logistic regression with stepwise procedure adjusted for iron/vitamin D deficiency, length of day, in-/outdoor discipline, and age; unadjusted logistic regression for ferritin thresholds and 25(OH)D cutoffs; Mann–Whitney U tests; p < 0.05 considered significant.

Limitations

  • Stated: cross-sectional design did not allow definite causal conclusions; lack of international unequivocal thresholds for diagnosing both vitamin D and iron deficiency; no hepcidin or interleukin data; no data on time spent outdoors, nutrient intake, or vitamin D/iron supplementation.
  • Evident: single blood sample collected at varied training phases and seasons, with no longitudinal follow-up; all participants were Caucasian female athletes, most from national teams, so findings may not generalize to other populations.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu10020167

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Percentage of athletes with normal iron status or iron deficiency in relation to vitamin D status (a) and with sufficient or insufficient concentration of 25(OH)D in relation to iron status (b).
Figure 1 Percentage of athletes with normal iron status or iron deficiency in relation to vitamin D status (a) and with sufficient or insufficient concentration of 25(OH)D in relation to iron status (b).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 1 Not valid · 19 Not checked · 47 Own results and interpretations

35 more claims

Create a free account to see all 67 claims and to verify the 33 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 17
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 12

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 76

Metadata

Authors
Malczewska-Lenczowska, J., Sitkowski, D., Surała, O., Orysiak, J., Szczepańska, B., & Witek, K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Nutrition Physiology and Dietetics, Institute of Sport, National Research Institute, Trylogii 2/16, 01-982 Warsaw, Poland
  • Instytut Sportu (PL)
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
167
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791208338
Cited by
76
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • the Ministry of Sport and Tourism of the Republic of Poland ((2016))
  • the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Poland ((2015-2017))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
vitamin D deficiency, iron deficiency, iron status, female athletes, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor, total iron binding capacity, erythropoiesis, iron metabolism, vitamin D synthesis
MeSH terms
Iron Deficiencies, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Ferritins, Health Status, Humans, Iron, Physical Fitness, Poland, Receptors, Transferrin, Vitamin D, Vitamin D Deficiency, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.