Cited by 11Nutritional Studies and DietSodium Intake and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Development, Validation, and Reproducibility of Food Group-Based Frequency Questionnaires for Clinical Use in Brazil: A Pre-Hypertension and Hypertension Diet Assessment

Open access
Rossato, Sinara L., Mosele, Francisca, Moreira, Leila B., Rodrigues, Marcela Perdomo, Lima, Ruchelli França, Fuchs, Flávio D., Fuchs, Sandra C.·2021·Nutrients

Abstract

The Blood pressure control diet is well described; however, it has not been implemented in clinical care, possibly due to the impracticability of the diet assessment in these contexts. In order to facilitate the dietary assessment, we developed and assessed the validity and reproducibility of two food group-based food frequency questionnaires (FG-FFQs), with a one-week (7-day FG-FFQ) and a one-month (30-day FG-FFQ) period of coverage for patients with pre-hypertension or hypertension. In 2010, 155 men and women, 30–70 years old, were invited to participate in a prospective study in two outpatient clinics in Porto Alegre, southern Brazil. The participants responded to two 30-day, two 7-day FG-FFQ, four 24-h dietary recalls, and underwent demographic, anthropometric, and blood pressure assessments. The validity and reproducibility were assessed using partial correlation coefficients adjusted for sex and age, and the internal validity was tested using the intra-class correlation coefficient. The participants were aged 61 (±10) years and 60% were women. The validity correlation coefficient was higher than r = 0.80 in the 30-day FG-FFQ for whole bread (r = 0.81) and the 7-day FG-FFQ for diet/light/zero soda and industrialized juices (r = 0.84) in comparison to the 24-h dietary recalls. The global internal validity was α = 0.59, but it increased to α = 0.76 when 19 redundant food groups were excluded. The reproducibility was higher than r = 0.80 for pasta, potatoes and manioc, bakery goods, sugar and cocoa, and beans for both versions. The 30-day had a slightly higher validity, both had good internal validity, and the 7-day FG-FFQ had a higher reproducibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu13113881

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]Willett W.C. Nutritional Epidemiology: 24-Hour Dietary Recall and Diet Records Methods 3rd ed. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 2013
  2. [16]Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology: Chapter Food Frequency Questionnaire pg 70-92 3rd ed. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 2013 9780199754038

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rossato, S. L., Mosele, F., Moreira, L. B., Rodrigues, M. P., Lima, R. F., Fuchs, F. D., & Fuchs, S. C.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Rossato, Sinara L.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-29
Volume
13
Issue
11
Pages
3881
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209442636
Cited by
11
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (308489/2009-8, 211521/2013-2, 309023/2015-7)
  • Santander Top Massachusetts (2012/2013)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (001)
  • Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (12-0207)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
dietary assessment, prehypertension, hypertension, questionnaire validity, reproducibility, 24-hour dietary recall, questionnaire development
MeSH terms
Dietary Approaches To Stop Hypertension, Adult, Aged, Brazil, Diet, Diet Surveys, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Reproducibility of Results, Prehypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review