Cited by 6Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

The Relative Merits of Observational and Experimental Research: Four Key Principles for Optimising Observational Research Designs

Open access
Hamlin, Robert·2022·Nutrients

Abstract

The main barrier to the publication of observational research is a perceived inferiority to randomised designs with regard to the reliability of their conclusions. This commentary addresses this issue and makes a set of recommendations. It analyses the issue of research reliability in detail and fully describes the three sources of research unreliability (certainty, risk and uncertainty). Two of these (certainty and uncertainty) are not adequately addressed in most research texts. It establishes that randomised designs are vulnerable as observation studies to these two sources of unreliability, and are therefore not automatically superior to observational research in all research situations. Two key principles for reducing research unreliability are taken from R.A. Fisher’s early work on agricultural research. These principles and their application are described in detail. The principles are then developed into four key principles that observational researchers should follow when they are designing observational research exercises in nutrition. It notes that there is an optimal sample size for any particular research exercise that should not be exceeded. It concludes that best practice in observational research is to replicate this optimal sized observational exercise multiple times in order to establish reliability and credibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu14214649

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The boundary conditions for any such generalisations can only be established by replication within other highly specific environments.

    “The boundary conditions for any such generalisations can only be established by replication within other highly specific environments [64].”

    From Marketing Tactics for Sustainable Fashion and the Circular Economy: The Impact of Ethical Labels on Fast Fashion Choice (2023) · cites this paper as [64]

    Section 4 says replication can test a result’s reliability and help identify environmental variables when results differ; Section 6 recommends replicating studies using temporally and environmentally homogeneous samples. The paper does not say that the boundary conditions of generalisations can only be established through replication in other highly specific environments. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Drummond K.E. Reyes A. Cooke N.K. Stage V.C. Nutrition Research: Concepts and Applications John Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2022
  2. [4]Longchamps L. Tremblay N. Panneton B. Observational Studies in Agriculture: Paradigm Shift Required Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Precision Agriculture Montreal, QC, Canada 24–27 June 2018 Available online: https://www.ispag.org/proceedings/?action=download&item=5436 (accessed on 1 July 2022)
  3. [32]Banks S. Experimentation in Marketing McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 1965
  4. [33]Tabachnik B.G. Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 7th ed. Pearson London, UK 2018
  5. [34]Dey A. Mukerjee R. Fractional Factorial Plans John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2009
  6. [37]Louviere J.J. Conjoint Analysis Advanced Methods of Marketing Research Blackwell Publications Cambridge, MA, USA 1994 223 259

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamlin, R.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hamlin, Robert
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-03
Volume
14
Issue
21
Pages
4649
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308198425
Cited by
6
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
randomized controlled trials, research reliability, certainty, risk, uncertainty, Fisher's principle, sample size, replication, nutrition research, research credibility
MeSH terms
Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review