CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingOrganic Food and AgricultureEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling on Food Products: A Narrative Literature Review

Open access
Cook, Brian, Costa Leite, João, Rayner, Mike, Stoffel, Sandro, van Rijn, Elaine, Wollgast, Jan·2023·Nutrients
DOI 10.3390/nu15173837PMC PMC10489983
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Sustainability labelling on food products can help consumers make informed purchasing decisions and support the urgent transition to sustainable food systems. While there is a relatively robust body of evidence on health and nutrition labelling, less is known about the effectiveness of sustainability labelling in facilitating sustainable food choices. This paper investigates the impact of sustainability labelling on consumer understanding, attitudes, and behaviour to support a more nuanced, detailed, and holistic understanding of the evidence. Using a narrative literature review methodology, the paper assesses studies covering environmental, social, and/or animal welfare aspects of sustainability labelling on food products. We found that consumer understanding of sustainability information is often limited, which could hinder behaviour change. While sustainability labelling can influence consumer attitudes and purchasing behaviours, evidence from real consumer settings tends to show small effect sizes. Consumers are generally willing to pay more for sustainability-labelled products, and organic labelling often leads to the highest reported willingness to pay. The review emphasises the importance of trust, suggesting a preference for labelling backed by governments or public authorities. Sustainability labelling that uses intuitively understandable cues has an increased impact, with visual aids such as traffic light colours showing promise. We conclude that further research is needed in real-world settings, using representative populations and exploring the influence of demographic factors, values, and attitudes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu15173837

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure A1 Relationship to Sustainability Labelling and Types.
Figure A1 Relationship to Sustainability Labelling and Types.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure A2 Number and Types of Labelling Evaluations Conducted.
Figure A2 Number and Types of Labelling Evaluations Conducted.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure A3 Perceived Challenges of Sustainability Labelling.
Figure A3 Perceived Challenges of Sustainability Labelling.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1 Types of Existing Sustainability Labelling by Objective.
Figure 1 Types of Existing Sustainability Labelling by Objective.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling. Adapted from Grunert, K. G., & Wills, J. M. (2007) [13].
Figure 2 Consumer Interaction with Sustainability Labelling. Adapted from Grunert, K. G., & Wills, J. M. (2007) [13].CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cook, B., Costa Leite, J., Rayner, M., Stoffel, S., van Rijn, E., & Wollgast, J.
Affiliations
  • Independent Researcher, Oxford OX4 3UD, UK
  • European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Joint Research Centre (IT)
Corresponding author
Wollgast, Jan
ORCID
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-02
Volume
15
Issue
17
Pages
3837
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/nu15173837
PMC
PMC10489983
OpenAlex
W4386410611
Cited by
134
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 18
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
European Commission (EX2022D594371-101, CT-EX2022D594537-101)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainability labelling, food products, consumer behavior, willingness to pay, organic labeling, consumer trust, traffic light labeling, environmental labelling, social labeling, animal welfare labels, sustainable food choices, consumer understanding, purchasing behaviour
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Welfare, Cues, Government, Group Processes, Product Labeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review