Cited by 49Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesIon Channels and Receptors

The Swipe Card Model of Odorant Recognition

Open access
Brookes, Jennifer, Horsfield, Andrew, Stoneham, A.·2012·Sensors

Abstract

Just how we discriminate between the different odours we encounter is notcompletely understood yet. While obviously a matter involving biology, the core issue isa matter for physics: what microscopic interactions enable the receptors in our noses-smallprotein switches—to distinguish scent molecules? We survey what is and is not known aboutthe physical processes that take place when we smell things, highlighting the difficultiesin developing a full understanding of the mechanics of odorant recognition. The maincurrent theories, discussed here, fall into two major groups. One class emphasises thescent molecule's shape, and is described informally as a "lock and key" mechanism. Butthere is another category, which we focus on and which we call "swipe card" theories:the molecular shape must be good enough, but the information that identifies the smellinvolves other factors. One clearly-defined "swipe card" mechanism that we discuss hereis Turin's theory, in which inelastic electron tunnelling is used to discern olfactant vibrationfrequencies. This theory is explicitly quantal, since it requires the molecular vibrations totake in or give out energy only in discrete quanta. These ideas lead to obvious experimentaltests and challenges. We describe the current theory in a form that takes into accountmolecular shape as well as olfactant vibrations. It emerges that this theory can explainmany observations hard to reconcile in other ways. There are still some important gapsin a comprehensive physics-based description of the central steps in odorant recognition. We also discuss how far these ideas carry over to analogous processes involving other smallbiomolecules, like hormones, steroids and neurotransmitters. We conclude with a discussionof possible quantum behaviours in biology more generally, the case of olfaction being justone example. This paper is presented in honour of Prof. Marshall Stoneham who passedaway unexpectedly during its writing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s121115709

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hartmann-Hahn resonances allow a sensor not resonant with an external signal to be driven at a strength that leads to dressed states whose splitting matches the external signal frequency, permitting a strong coherent response.

    “This problem may be overcome by continuously driving the electron spin in the sensor at a strength that leads to dressed states whose splitting matches the frequency of the external signal and thus permits a strong coherent response of the sensor (transitions between upper and lower dressed states) [80-82].”

    From Vibrations, quanta and biology (2013) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [46]Graham Solomons T.W. Organic Chemistry John Wiley & Sones Hoboken, NJ, USA 1995
  2. [71]Buck L. Axel R. Odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system Cell 1991 65 175 187 1840504

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brookes, J., Horsfield, A., & Stoneham, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • London Centre for Nanotechnology (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Brookes, Jennifer
  • Horsfield, Andrew
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2012-11-12
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
15709-15749
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134031659
Cited by
49
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
odorant recognition, olfaction, olfactory receptors, lock-and-key mechanism, molecular geometry, quantum biology, odor discrimination, small biomolecules
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Odorants, Pheromones, Smell, Receptors, Odorant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review