The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Methods for Sensing the Nitrogen Status in Plants: Advantages, Disadvantages and Recent Advances
Open accessAbstract
Nitrogen (N) plays a key role in the plant life cycle. It is the main plant mineral nutrient needed for chlorophyll production and other plant cell components (proteins, nucleic acids, amino acids). Crop yield is affected by plant N status. Thus, the optimization of nitrogen fertilization has become the object of intense research due to its environmental and economic impact. This article focuses on reviewing current methods and techniques used to determine plant N status. Kjeldahl digestion and Dumas combustion have been used as reference methods for N determination in plants, but they are destructive and time consuming. By using spectroradiometers, reflectometers, imagery from satellite sensors and digital cameras, optical properties have been measured to estimate N in plants, such as crop canopy reflectance, leaf transmittance, chlorophyll and polyphenol fluorescence. High correlation has been found between optical parameters and plant N status, and those techniques are not destructive. However, some drawbacks include chlorophyll saturation, atmospheric and soil interference, and the high cost of instruments. Electrical properties of plant tissue have been used to estimate quality in fruits, and water content in plants, as well as nutrient deficiency, which suggests that they have potential for use in plant N determination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meeuwsen, S., Horgan, G. W., & Elia, M. (2010) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.011 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758 · Cited by 429
A survey on the role of Internet of Things for adopting and promoting Agriculture 4.0
Raj, M., Gupta, S., Chamola, V., Elhence, A., Garg, T., Atiquzzaman, M., & Niyato, D. (2021) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103107 · Cited by 283
Akyüz, A., & Ersus, S. (2021) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127673 · Cited by 183
Singha, K. T., Sebastian, A., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2019) · International Journal of Phytoremediation · doi:10.1080/15226514.2018.1474442 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Muñoz-Huerta, R., Guevara-Gonzalez, R., Contreras-Medina, L., Torres-Pacheco, I., Prado-Olivarez, J., & Ocampo-Velazquez, R.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-08-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 10823-10843
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086314176
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Methods for Sensing the Nitrogen Status in Plants: Advantages, Disadvantages and Recent Advances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s130810823
- The paper
- Muñoz-Huerta, R., Guevara-Gonzalez, R., Contreras-Medina, L., Torres-Pacheco, I., Prado-Olivarez, J., & Ocampo-Velazquez, R. (2013). A Review of Methods for Sensing the Nitrogen Status in Plants: Advantages, Disadvantages and Recent Advances. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130810823
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.