The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
In the last years, gait phase partitioning has come to be a challenging research topic due to its impact on several applications related to gait technologies. A variety of sensors can be used to feed algorithms for gait phase partitioning, mainly classifiable as wearable or non-wearable. Among wearable sensors, footswitches or foot pressure insoles are generally considered as the gold standard; however, to overcome some inherent limitations of the former, inertial measurement units have become popular in recent decades. Valuable results have been achieved also though electromyography, electroneurography, and ultrasonic sensors. Non-wearable sensors, such as opto-electronic systems along with force platforms, remain the most accurate system to perform gait analysis in an indoor environment. In the present paper we identify, select, and categorize the available methodologies for gait phase detection, analyzing advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Finally, we comparatively examine the obtainable gait phase granularities, the usable computational methodologies and the optimal sensor placements on the targeted body segments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control
Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313399 · Cited by 19,592
THE MAJOR DETERMINANTS IN NORMAL AND PATHOLOGICAL GAIT
Saunders, J. B. D. M., Inman, V. T., & Eberhart, H. D. (1953) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-195335030-00003 · Cited by 1,299
Zeni, J. A., Richards, J. G., & Higginson, J. S. (2008) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 · Cited by 1,261
Fuzzy Logic: Intelligence, Control, and Information
Yen, J., & Langari, R. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,184
Muro-de-la-Herran, A., Garcia-Zapirain, B., & Mendez-Zorrilla, A. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140203362 · Cited by 1,172
Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review
Campos, S., Doxey, J., & Hammond, D. (2011) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980010003290 · Cited by 937
Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes
Aminian, K., Najafi, B., Büla, C., Leyvraz, P.-F., & Robert, P. (2002) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00008-8 · Cited by 814
Machine Learning Methods for Classifying Human Physical Activity from On-Body Accelerometers
Mannini, A., & Sabatini, A. M. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100201154 · Cited by 781
Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait
Blaya, J. A., & Herr, H. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2003.823266 · Cited by 741
Cited by
Wearable sensor-based real-time gait detection: A systematic review
Prasanth, H., Caban, M., Keller, U., Courtine, G., Ijspeert, A., Vallery, H., & von Zitzewitz, J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21082727 · Cited by 348
Use of wearable sensor technology in gait, balance, and range of motion analysis
Díaz, S., Stephenson, J. B., & Labrador, M. A. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10010234 · Cited by 132
A review of current state-of-the-art control methods for lower-limb powered prostheses
Gehlhar, R., Tucker, M., Young, A. J., & Ames, A. D. (2023) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.003 · Cited by 131
Deep Learning Approaches for Enhanced Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Control: A Review
Belal, M., Alsheikh, N., Aljarah, A., & Hussain, I. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3414175 · Cited by 42
Acute effects of acupuncture in balance and gait of Parkinson disease patients - A preliminary study
Pereira, C. R., Criado, M. B., Machado, J., Pereira, C. T., & Santos, M. J. (2021) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101479 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Taborri, J., Palermo, E., Rossi, S., & Cappa, P.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2222399534
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s16010066
- The paper
- Taborri, J., Palermo, E., Rossi, S., & Cappa, P. (2016). Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16010066
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
