The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait
Abstract
An active ankle-foot orthoses (AAFO) is presented where the impedance of the orthotic joint is modulated throughout the walking cycle to treat drop-foot gait. During controlled plantar flexion, a biomimetic torsional spring control is applied where orthotic joint stiffness is actively adjusted to minimize forefoot collisions with the ground. Throughout late stance, joint impedance is minimized so as not to impede powered plantar flexion movements, and during the swing phase, a torsional spring-damper control lifts the foot to provide toe clearance. To assess the clinical effects of variable-impedance control, kinetic and kinematic gait data were collected on two drop-foot participants wearing the AAFO. For each participant, zero, constant, and variable impedance control strategies were evaluated and the results were compared to the mechanics of three age, weight, and height matched normals. We find that actively adjusting joint impedance reduces the occurrence of slap foot allows greater powered plantar flexion and provides for less kinematic difference during swing when compared to normals. These results indicate that a variable-impedance orthosis may have certain clinical benefits for the treatment of drop-foot gait compared to conventional ankle-foot orthoses having zero or constant stiffness joint behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking
Kadaba, M. P., Ramakrishnan, H. K., & Wootten, M. E. (1990) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100080310 · Cited by 3,216
Clinical use of the odstock dropped foot stimulator: Its effect on the speed and effort of walking
Taylor, P. N., Burridge, J. H., Dunkerley, A. L., Wood, D. E., Norton, J. A., Singleton, C., & Swain, I. D. (1999) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90333-7 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 · Cited by 1,182
Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle–foot rehabilitation
Park, Y.-L., Chen, B.-R., Pérez-Arancibia, N. O., Young, D., Stirling, L., Wood, R. J., Goldfield, E. C., & Nagpal, R. (2014) · Bioinspiration & Biomimetics · doi:10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016007 · Cited by 497
Kong, K., Bae, J., & Tomizuka, M. (2009) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2008.2004561 · Cited by 426
Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review
Taborri, J., Palermo, E., Rossi, S., & Cappa, P. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010066 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaya, J. A., & Herr, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-31
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2127927857
- Cited by
- 741
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2003.823266
- The paper
- Blaya, J. A., & Herr, H. (2004). Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2003.823266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.