Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Learning to Predict Falls in Older Adults Based on Daily-Life Trunk Accelerometry

Open access
Nait Aicha, Ahmed, Englebienne, Gwenn, Van Schooten, Kimberley S., Pijnappels, Mirjam, Kröse, Ben·2018·Sensors

Abstract

Early detection of high fall risk is an essential component of fall prevention in older adults. Wearable sensors can provide valuable insight into daily-life activities; biomechanical features extracted from such inertial data have been shown to be of added value for the assessment of fall risk. Body-worn sensors such as accelerometers can provide valuable insight into fall risk. Currently, biomechanical features derived from accelerometer data are used for the assessment of fall risk. Here, we studied whether deep learning methods from machine learning are suited to automatically derive features from raw accelerometer data that assess fall risk. We used an existing dataset of 296 older adults. We compared the performance of three deep learning model architectures (convolutional neural network (CNN), long short-term memory (LSTM) and a combination of these two (ConvLSTM)) to each other and to a baseline model with biomechanical features on the same dataset. The results show that the deep learning models in a single-task learning mode are strong in recognition of identity of the subject, but that these models only slightly outperform the baseline method on fall risk assessment. When using multi-task learning, with gender and age as auxiliary tasks, deep learning models perform better. We also found that preprocessing of the data resulted in the best performance (AUC = 0.75). We conclude that deep learning models, and in particular multi-task learning, effectively assess fall risk on the basis of wearable sensor data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s18051654

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ambrose, 2013, Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature, Maturitas, 75, 51, 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rubenstein, 2006, Falls in older people: Epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention, Age Ageing, 35, ii37, 10.1093/ageing/afl084 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Deandrea, 2010, Review Article: Risk Factors for Falls in Community-dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Epidemiology, 21, 658, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181e89905 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Tinetti, 1986, Performance-Oriented Assessment of Mobility Problems in Elderly Patients, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 34, 119, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb05480.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Berg, 1989, Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument, Physiother. Can., 41, 304, 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Barry, E., Galvin, R., Keogh, C., Horgan, F., and Fahey, T. (2014). Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr., 14. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ordonez, 2014, Bayesian Inference in Hidden Markov Models for In-Home Activity Recognition, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 13, 67, 10.1109/MPRV.2014.52 · DOI
  8. Nait Aicha, A., Englebienne, G., and Kröse, B. (2017). Continuous measuring of the indoor walking speed of older adults living alone. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput., 1–11. · DOI
  9. Howcroft, 2013, Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors, J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 10, 91, 10.1186/1743-0003-10-91 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pijnappels, 2015, Ambulatory fall-risk assessment: Amount and quality of daily-life gait predict falls in older adults, J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci., 70, 608, 10.1093/gerona/glu225 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rispens, 2015, Identification of fall risk predictors in daily life measurements: Gait characteristics’ reliability and association with self-reported fall history, Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 29, 54, 10.1177/1545968314532031 · DOI
  12. Weiss, 2013, Does the evaluation of gait quality during daily life provide insight into fall risk? A novel approach using 3-day accelerometer recordings, Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, 27, 742, 10.1177/1545968313491004 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mancini, 2016, Continuous monitoring of turning mobility and its association to falls and cognitive function: A pilot study, J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 71, 1102, 10.1093/gerona/glw019 · DOI
  14. Najafi, 2002, Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 49, 843, 10.1109/TBME.2002.800763 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Folstein, 1975, Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician, J. Psychiatr. Res., 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rispens, 2015, Do extreme values of daily-life gait characteristics provide more information about fall risk than median values?, JMIR Res. Protoc., 4, e4, 10.2196/resprot.3931 · doi:10.2196/resprot.3931
  17. Dijkstra, 2010, Detection of gait and postures using a miniaturised triaxial accelerometer-based system: Accuracy in community-dwelling older adults, Age Ageing, 39, 259, 10.1093/ageing/afp249 · DOI
  18. Van Schooten, K.S., Pijnappels, M., Rispens, S.M., Elders, P.J.M., Lips, P., Daffertshofer, A., Beek, P.J., and van Dieën, J.H. (2016). Daily-life gait quality as predictor of falls in older people: A 1-year prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 11. · DOI
  19. Abdel-Hamid, O., Mohamed, A.R., Jiang, H., and Penn, G. (2012, January 25–30). Applying convolutional neural networks concepts to hybrid NN-HMM model for speech recognition. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Kyoto, Japan. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Toshev, A., and Szegedy, C. (2014, January 24–27). Deeppose: Human pose estimation via deep neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., and Le, Q.V. (2014, January 8–13). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  22. Graves, A. (arXiv, 2013). Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks, arXiv.
  23. Bal, 2016, A Medium-Scale Distributed System for Computer Science Research: Infrastructure for the Long Term, Computer, 49, 54, 10.1109/MC.2016.127 · DOI
  24. Bengio, 1994, Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 5, 157, 10.1109/72.279181 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Caruana, R. (1993, January 27–29). Multitask Learning: A Knowledge-Based Source of Inductive Bias. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Amherst, MA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Van Kasteren, T.L., Englebienne, G., and Kröse, B.J. (2011, January 16–18). Hierarchical activity recognition using automatically clustered actions. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Ambient Intelligence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Nait Aicha, A., Englebienne, G., Van Schooten, K. S., Pijnappels, M., & Kröse, B.
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-05-22
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
1654
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804907753
Cited by
207
References
7
FWCI
39.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.