The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
County-Level Soybean Yield Prediction Using Deep CNN-LSTM Model
Open accessAbstract
Yield prediction is of great significance for yield mapping, crop market planning, crop insurance, and harvest management. Remote sensing is becoming increasingly important in crop yield prediction. Based on remote sensing data, great progress has been made in this field by using machine learning, especially the Deep Learning (DL) method, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) or Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Recent experiments in this area suggested that CNN can explore more spatial features and LSTM has the ability to reveal phenological characteristics, which both play an important role in crop yield prediction. However, very few experiments combining these two models for crop yield prediction have been reported. In this paper, we propose a deep CNN-LSTM model for both end-of-season and in-season soybean yield prediction in CONUS at the county-level. The model was trained by crop growth variables and environment variables, which include weather data, MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) data, and MODIS Surface Reflectance (SR) data; historical soybean yield data were employed as labels. Based on the Google Earth Engine (GEE), all these training data were combined and transformed into histogram-based tensors for deep learning. The results of the experiment indicate that the prediction performance of the proposed CNN-LSTM model can outperform the pure CNN or LSTM model in both end-of-season and in-season. The proposed method shows great potential in improving the accuracy of yield prediction for other crops like corn, wheat, and potatoes at fine scales in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., et al. (2015) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.66 · Cited by 6,362
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review
Liakos, K., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082674 · Cited by 3,441
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., & Lengauer, T. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 · Cited by 2,843
Significant Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices: A Review of Developments and Applications
Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017) · Journal of Sensors · doi:10.1155/2017/1353691 · Cited by 2,486
Deep learning based multi-temporal crop classification
Zhong, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, H. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.032 · Cited by 1,024
Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks
Khaki, S., & Wang, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00621 · Cited by 864
Forecasting crop yield using remotely sensed vegetation indices and crop phenology metrics
Bolton, D. K., & Friedl, M. A. (2013) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.01.007 · Cited by 785
A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities
Huang, C.-J., & Kuo, P.-H. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18072220 · Cited by 705
A scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper
Lobell, D. B., Thau, D., Seifert, C., Engle, E., & Little, B. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021 · Cited by 602
Crop yield prediction with deep convolutional neural networks
Nevavuori, P., Narra, N., & Lipping, T. (2019) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.104859 · Cited by 586
Cited by
Ayoub Shaikh, T., Rasool, T., & Rasheed Lone, F. (2022) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2022.107119 · Cited by 768
Rashid, M., Bari, B. S., Yusup, Y., Kamaruddin, M. A., & Khan, N. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3075159 · Cited by 369
A Systematic Literature Review on Crop Yield Prediction with Deep Learning and Remote Sensing
Muruganantham, P., Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., Samrat, N. H., & Islam, N. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14091990 · Cited by 339
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271
Self-citationHigh-throughput phenotyping: Breaking through the bottleneck in future crop breeding
Song, P., Wang, J., Guo, X., Yang, W., & Zhao, C. (2021) · The Crop Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.015 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, J., Di, L., Sun, Z., Shen, Y., & Lai, Z.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-10-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4363
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979666105
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: County-Level Soybean Yield Prediction Using Deep CNN-LSTM Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s19204363
- The paper
- Sun, J., Di, L., Sun, Z., Shen, Y., & Lai, Z. (2019). County-Level Soybean Yield Prediction Using Deep CNN-LSTM Model. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.