Cited by 72Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsWireless Body Area Networks

A Systematic Review on the Use of Wearable Body Sensors for Health Monitoring: A Qualitative Synthesis

Open access
Kristoffersson, Annica, Lindén, Maria·2020·Sensors

Abstract

The use of wearable body sensors for health monitoring is a quickly growing field with the potential of offering a reliable means for clinical and remote health management. This includes both real-time monitoring and health trend monitoring with the aim to detect/predict health deterioration and also to act as a prevention tool. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a qualitative synthesis of studies using wearable body sensors for health monitoring. The synthesis and analysis have pointed out a number of shortcomings in prior research. Major shortcomings are demonstrated by the majority of the studies adopting an observational research design, too small sample sizes, poorly presented, and/or non-representative participant demographics (i.e., age, gender, patient/healthy). These aspects need to be considered in future research work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s20051502

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research.

    “These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • The vast majority of studies were undertaken in North America, about twice as many as in Europe.

    “The vast majority of studies were undertaken in North America, about twice as many as in Europe, which is consistent with the previous literature [225].”
  • Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most were from Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep.

    “Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most of them are from the company Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep [3,27,31,224,225].”
  • There is a positive trend in wearable studies, underlining growing interest in wearables in health research.

    “Overall, we have identified a positive trend in wearable studies, underlining the growing interest in wearables in health research, in line with other reviews [3,224-226].”
  • Although data analytic skills are needed for handling big data sets, their analysis might be extremely valuable for health research in generating new evidence.

    “Although data analytic skills are needed for handling big data sets, their analysis might be extremely valuable for health research in generating new evidence [31,225].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kristoffersson, A., & Lindén, M.
Affiliations
  • Mälardalen University (SE)
  • School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 722 20 Västerås, Sweden
Corresponding author
Kristoffersson, Annica
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1502
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010184906
Cited by
72
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling (20180158)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
health monitoring, real-time monitoring, health prediction, disease prevention, study design limitations, sample size, participant demographics
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Internet of Things, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Telemedicine, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review