Cited by 572Sex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in MedicineSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Sex and gender differences in health: Science & Society Series on Sex and Science

Open access
Regitz‐Zagrosek, Vera·2012·The EMBO Reports

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/embor.2012.87

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of gender biases in health research and their impact on health programs, projects, policies, and outcomes have been widely indicated and discussed.

    “The presence of gender biases in health research and their impact on health programs, projects, policies, and outcomes have been widely indicated and discussed (Jiménez, 2014; Nieuwenhoven & Klinge, 2010; Regitz-Zagrosek, 2012; WHO, 2011a).”

    From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Regitz-Zagrosek, 2012

  • Both biological sex and socio-cultural gender aspects are relevant sources of variation in a number of clinical and subclinical conditions, affecting risk factors, prevalence, age of onset, symptomatology manifestation, prognosis, biomarkers and treatment effectiveness.

    “constitute relevant sources of variation in a number of clinical and subclinical conditions, affecting risk factors, prevalence, age of onset, symptomatology manifestation, prognosis, biomarkers and treatment effectiveness2”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Seeland U, Regitz-Zagrosek V (2012) Geschlechtsspezifische Unterschiede in der Kardiologie-Schwerpunkt Prävention- Thieme XX 2: 100-106

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regitz‐Zagrosek, V.
Affiliations
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Regitz‐Zagrosek, Vera
Venue
The EMBO Reports
Published
2012-06-15
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
596-603
ISSN
  • 1469-221X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3178
OpenAlex
W1996579832
Cited by
572
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
sex differences, gender differences, evidence-based medicine, sex differences in health, women's health, men's health, sex differences in behavior
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Women's Health, Health Care Sector, Men's Health, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review