Cited by 36ECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Compressed Deep Learning to Classify Arrhythmia in an Embedded Wearable Device

Open access
Lee, Kwang-Sig, Park, Hyun-Joon, Kim, Ji Eon, Kim, Hee Jung, Chon, Sangil, Kim, Sangkyu, Jang, Jaesung, Kim, Jin-Kook +3 more·2022·Sensors

Abstract

The importance of an embedded wearable device with automatic detection and alarming cannot be overstated, given that 15–30% of patients with atrial fibrillation are reported to be asymptomatic. These asymptomatic patients do not seek medical care, hence traditional diagnostic tools including Holter are not effective for the further prevention of associated stroke or heart failure. This is likely to be more so in the era of COVID-19, in which patients become more reluctant on hospitalization and checkups. However, little literature is available on this important topic. For this reason, this study developed efficient deep learning with model compression, which is designed to use ECG data and classify arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device. ECG-signal data came from Korea University Anam Hospital in Seoul, Korea, with 28,308 unique patients (15,412 normal and 12,896 arrhythmia). Resnets and Mobilenets with model compression (TensorFlow Lite) were applied and compared for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device. The weight size of the compressed model registered a remarkable decrease from 743 MB to 76 KB (1/10000), whereas its performance was almost the same as its original counterpart. Resnet and Mobilenet were similar in terms of accuracy, i.e., Resnet-50 Hz (97.3) vs. Mo-bilenet-50 Hz (97.2), Resnet-100 Hz (98.2) vs. Mobilenet-100 Hz (97.9). Here, 50 Hz/100 Hz denotes the down-sampling rate. However, Resnets took more flash memory and longer inference time than did Mobilenets. In conclusion, Mobilenet would be a more efficient model than Resnet to classify arrhythmia in an embedded wearable device.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22051776

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K.-S., Park, H.-J., Kim, J. E., Kim, H. J., Chon, S., Kim, S., Jang, J., Kim, J.-K., Jang, S., Gil, Y., & Son, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Korea University Anam Hospital (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Korea
  • HUINNO Co., Ltd., Seoul 06011, Korea
Corresponding author
Son, Ho Sung
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-24
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1776
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4214691458
Cited by
36
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Korea government (No. 1711138362, KMDF_PR_20200901_0174-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
arrhythmia classification, wearable devices, model compression, TensorFlow Lite, ResNet, MobileNet, ECG signals, embedded systems, atrial fibrillation, flash memory, inference latency
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Deep Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review