Cited by 20Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

A Blockchain-Based Privacy Information Security Sharing Scheme in Industrial Internet of Things

Open access
Wang, Yue, Che, Tingyu, Zhao, Xiaohu, Zhou, Tao, Zhang, Kai, Hu, Xiaofei·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Due to the competitive relationship among different smart factories, equipment manufacturers cannot integrate the private information of all smart factories to train the intelligent manufacturing equipment fault prediction model and improve the accuracy of intelligent manufacturing equipment fault detection. The use of a low fault recognition rate model for smart factories will cause additional losses for them. In this work, we propose a blockchain-based privacy information security sharing scheme in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) to solve the sharing problem of private information in smart factories. Firstly, we abstract smart factories as edge nodes and build decentralized, distributed trusted blockchain networks based on Ethereum clients on simulated edge devices and propose an Intelligent Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (IECDSA) to guarantee the ownership of shared information by edge nodes. Secondly, we propose the Reputation-based Delegated Proof of Stake (RDPoS) consensus algorithm to improve the security and reliability of the Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus algorithm. Furthermore, we design and implement an incentive mechanism based on information attributes to increase the motivation of edge nodes to share information. Finally, the proposed solution is simulated. Through theoretical and simulation experiments, it is proved that the blockchain-based privacy information security sharing scheme in IIoT can improve the enthusiasm of edge nodes to share information on the premise of ensuring the security of information sharing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22093426

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ECC ensures data security in the IIoT ecosystem.

    “ECC ensures data security in the IIoT ecosystem [169].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [169]

    Section 4.1 says the paper’s elliptic-curve signature algorithm (IECDSA) verifies signatures and protects ownership of shared information. The Conclusions also credit the blockchain consensus algorithm with data-consistency security. Thus, the paper supports a narrower security role for an elliptic-curve algorithm, not the claim that ECC alone ensures data security across the IIoT ecosystem. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Traditional blockchain based on Public Key Random Generation (PKRG), which uses secret keys and random nonces to generate new public keys, ensures user anonymity and untraceability in IIoT systems.

    “Traditional Blockchain based on Public Key Random Generation (PKRG), which uses secret keys and random nonces to generate randomly new public keys, can indeed ensure user anonymity and untraceability in IIoT systems [169].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [169]

    Section 4.1 (Methods; page unavailable) describes a private key and a pseudo-random number used in the paper’s signature algorithm, but does not describe Public Key Random Generation (PKRG). The supplied passages and searches for PKRG, anonymity, and untraceability found no statement that PKRG ensures either property in IIoT systems. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Che, T., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., Zhang, K., & Hu, X.
Affiliations
  • China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
  • Chengdu Neusoft University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Xiaohu
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-04-30
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
3426
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225285241
Cited by
20
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds (2020ZDPY0223)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
blockchain, Industrial Internet of Things, smart factory, equipment failure prediction, fault detection, ECDSA, Ethereum, delegated proof of stake, reputation-based consensus, incentive mechanisms, edge nodes, data ownership
MeSH terms
Internet of Things, Blockchain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Security, Privacy, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review