CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72Smart Cities and TechnologiesE-Government and Public ServicesLegal and Policy Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E-Governance in Smart Cities: Global Trends and Key Enablers

Open access
Kuzior, Aleksandra, Pakhnenko, Olena, Tiutiunyk, Inna, Lyeonov, Serhiy·2023·Smart Cities
DOI 10.3390/smartcities6040078
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A smart city is a complex concept that can be analyzed from different aspects and points of view. E-governance plays a key role in facilitating the integration of all elements of a smart city. The purpose of the article is to investigate key enablers of e-governance in terms of economic, social, political, information and technological indicators. The research base includes 68 smart cities selected on the basis of different regional affiliations and different economic, social and political developments. The authors apply the methods of cluster analysis (to divide smart cities into clusters according to e-governance indicators); construction of an integral indicator using the linear mathematical model and the Fishburn formula; VAR/VEC modeling (to stud the key factors influencing the development of e-government in smart cities). It was found that the Human Development Index has the greatest impact on e-governance, while the GNI per capita indicator demonstrated the absence of influence for all clusters. The factor of information technologies was defined as the main factor of direct influence on the Smart City Governance Index for smart cities of the first cluster with the highest indicators of e-governance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/smartcities6040078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 72

  1. Hayat, 2016, Smart cities: A global perspective, India Q., 72, 177, 10.1177/0974928416637930 · DOI
  2. Kummitha, 2017, How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective, Cities, 67, 43, 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010 · DOI
  3. Shamsuzzoha, 2021, Smart city for sustainable environment: A comparison of participatory strategies from Helsinki, Singapore and London, Cities, 114, 103194, 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103194 · DOI
  4. Alnaser, 2022, Do E-Government Services Affect Jordanian Customer Loyalty?, Mark. Manag. Innov., 2, 17
  5. Muradov, 2022, Problems of E-Governance in Government Agencies and Their Solutions, SocioEconomic Chall., 6, 79, 10.21272/sec.6(1).79-86.2022 · DOI
  6. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T.A., and Scholl, H.J. (2012, January 4–7). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, USA. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kitchin, 2014, The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism, GeoJournal, 79, 1, 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Nam, T., and Pardo, T.A. (2011, January 12–15). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, College Park, MD, USA. · DOI
  9. Batty, 2012, Smart cities of the future, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top., 214, 481, 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Meijer, 2016, Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance, Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., 82, 392, 10.1177/0020852314564308 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Perera, 2014, Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., 25, 81, 10.1002/ett.2704 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Almirall, 2013, A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona, J. Knowl. Econ., 4, 135, 10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hollands, 2015, Critical interventions into the corporate smart city, Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 61, 10.1093/cjres/rsu011 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Shelton, 2015, The ‘actually existing smart city’, Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 8, 13, 10.1093/cjres/rsu026 · DOI
  15. Gabrys, 2014, Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city, Environ. Plan. D Soc. Space, 32, 30, 10.1068/d16812 · DOI
  16. 2018, Governance in smart cities: A comparison of practitioners’ perceptions and prior research, Int. J. E-Plan. Res., 7, 1
  17. Melnyk, 2021, Digital and economic transformations for sustainable development promotion: A case of OECD countries, Environ. Econ., 12, 140, 10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.12 · DOI
  18. Ngo, 2021, Smart city: An approach from the view of smart urban governance, Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol., 12, 314
  19. Petrova, 2020, Digital economy and digital employment appearance, Soc. Labour Relat. Theory Pract., 10, 10, 10.21511/slrtp.10(2).2020.02 · DOI
  20. Sontiwanich, P., Boonchai, C., and Beeton, R.J.S. (2022). An Unsustainable Smart City: Lessons from Uneven Citizen Education and Engagement in Thailand. Sustainability, 14. · DOI
  21. Tang, 2021, Revisit the drivers and barriers to e-governance in the mobile age: A case study on the adoption of city management mobile apps for smart urban governance, J. Urban Aff., 43, 563, 10.1080/07352166.2019.1572455 · DOI
  22. Viale Pereira, G., Eibl, G., and Parycek, P. (2018, January 23–27). The role of digital technologies in promoting smart city governance. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2018—Companion of the World Wide Web Conference, Lyon, France. · DOI
  23. Ullah, 2021, Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 167, 120743, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120743 · DOI
  24. Youssef, A., and Hajek, P. (2021, January 2–3). How smart governance is driving the advancement of smart cities?. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM 2021, Coventry, UK.
  25. Kumar, 2022, Use of artificial intelligence to enhance e-government services, Meas. Sens., 24, 100484, 10.1016/j.measen.2022.100484 · DOI
  26. Bilan, 2022, Systematic bibliometric review of artificial intelligence technology in organizational management, development, change and culture, Bus. Theory Pract., 23, 13204
  27. Bukhtiarova, 2018, Modeling of FinTech market development (on the example of Ukraine), Innov. Mark., 14, 34, 10.21511/im.14(4).2018.03 · DOI
  28. Ejaz, 2017, Efficient energy management for the internet of things in smart cities, IEEE Commun. Mag., 55, 84, 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600218CM · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kuznetsov, A., Kiian, A., Babenko, V., Perevozova, I., Chepurko, I., and Smirnov, O. (2020, January 14–18). New approach to the implementation of post-quantum digital signature scheme. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 11th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies 2020, Kyiv, Ukraine. · DOI
  30. Oliveira, T.A., Oliver, M., and Ramalhinho, H. (2020). Challenges for connecting citizens and smart cities: ICT, e-governance and blockchain. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  31. Sarangi, 2022, Smart city E-governance through intelligent ICT framework, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect., 14, 1, 10.4018/IJISSS.290543 · DOI
  32. Sharma, 2017, A secure remote user authentication scheme for smart cities e-governance applications, J. Reliab. Intell. Environ., 3, 177, 10.1007/s40860-017-0046-x · DOI
  33. Modreanu, 2022, An Overview of The Fourth Industrial Revolution through the Business Lens, Bus. Ethics Leadersh., 6, 39, 10.21272/bel.6(1).39-46.2022 · DOI
  34. Gurbanov, 2022, Digitalization and the COVID-19-led public crisis management: An evaluation of financial sustainability in the Azerbaijan business sector, SocioEconomic Chall., 6, 23, 10.21272/sec.6(3).23-38.2022 · DOI
  35. Harshad, 2022, The Constitution of Value, Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks, 6, 75
  36. Melnyk, 2019, Business models of reproduction cycles for digital economy, CEUR Workshop Proc., 2393, 269
  37. Melnyk, 2022, Conceptualization and Measuring the Digital Economy, Bus. Ethics Leadersh., 6, 127, 10.21272/bel.6(2).127-135.2022 · DOI
  38. Moskalenko, 2022, The investment attractiveness of countries: Coupling between core dimensions, Forum Sci. Oeconomia, 10, 153
  39. Sadigov, 2022, Impact of Digitalization on Entrepreneurship Development in the Context of Business Innovation Management, Mark. Manag. Innov., 1, 167
  40. Sudomyr, 2022, Innovative susceptibility of the socio-economic systems, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag., 13, 1
  41. Kuzior, 2021, Changes in the management of electronic public services in the metropolis during the COVID-19 pandemic | Zmiany w zarządzaniu elektronicznymi usługami publicznymi w metropolii podczas pandemii COVID-19, Pol. J. Manag. Stud., 24, 261
  42. Krawczyk, 2022, Optimizing the Provision of Public Services By Local Administration as a Component of the Smart City Concept on the Example of Zabrze, Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng., 30, 192
  43. Lakhno, 2018, Model of Managing of the Procedure of Mutual Financial Investing in Information Technologies and Smart City Systems, Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., 9, 1802
  44. Kinelski, G., Stechły, J., and Bartkowiak, P. (2022). Various Facets of Sustainable Smart City Management: Selected Examples from Polish Metropolitan Areas. Energies, 15. · DOI
  45. Kuzior, 2020, The Quadruple Helix Model as a Smart City Design Principle, Virtual Econ., 3, 39, 10.34021/ve.2020.03.01(2) · DOI
  46. Giela, 2022, Cognitive Technologies in Smart City Services as the Future in Strategic Management of Cities, Manag. Syst. Prod. Eng., 30, 276
  47. Koibichuk, 2023, Content and Meaning of Financial Cyber Security: A Bibliometric Analysis, Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks, 7, 145
  48. Kuzior, A., Vasylieva, T., Kuzmenko, O., Koibichuk, V., and Brożek, P. (2022). Global digital convergence: Impact of cybersecurity, business transparency, economic transformation, and AML efficiency. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 8. · DOI
  49. Kuzmenko, 2021, Modeling of “information bubbles” in the global information space, J. Int. Stud., 14, 270, 10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-4/18 · DOI
  50. Litovtseva, 2022, Marketing research in the context of trust in the public sector: A case of the digital environment, Innov. Mark., 18, 133, 10.21511/im.18(4).2022.12 · DOI
  51. Solanas, 2013, The pursuit of citizens’ privacy: A privacy-aware smart city is possible, IEEE Commun. Mag., 51, 136, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525606 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mynenko, 2022, The Impact of Digitalization on the Transparency of Public Authorities, Bus. Ethics Leadersh., 6, 103, 10.21272/bel.6(2).103-115.2022 · DOI
  53. Samusevych, 2021, Convergence trends in the “economy–education–digitalization—National security” chain, Nauk. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 177, 10.33271/nvngu/2021-6/177 · DOI
  54. Yarovenko, 2022, Dynamic and bibliometric analysis of terms identifying the combating financial and cyber fraud system, Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks, 6, 93
  55. Zhghenti, 2022, Sharing Economy Platforms in Georgia: Digital Trust, Loyalty and Satisfaction, Mark. Manag. Innov., 2, 209
  56. Toh, 2022, Smart city indexes, criteria, indicators and rankings: An in-depth investigation and analysis, IET Smart Cities, 4, 211, 10.1049/smc2.12036 · DOI
  57. Ependi, U., Rochim, A.F., and Wibowo, A. (2022, January 23–25). Smart city assessment for sustainable city development on smart governance: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications, Chiangrai, Thailand. · DOI
  58. Choudhuri, 2021, Determinants of Smart Digital Infrastructure Diffusion for Urban Public Services, J. Glob. Inf. Manag., 29, 1, 10.4018/JGIM.295976 · DOI
  59. Ramdhani, 2018, Analysis of determinant factors of e-Government implementation, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 434, 012049, 10.1088/1757-899X/434/1/012049 · DOI
  60. Defitri, 2020, Determinant factors of e-government implementation and public accountability: TOE framework approach, Public Policy Adm., 19, 37
  61. Lozynskyy, 2021, City size and functional specialization as factors of smart management: A case of Lviv Oblast, Ukraine, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 19, 384
  62. Dias, 2020, Determinants of e-government implementation at the local level: An empirical model, Online Inf. Rev., 44, 1307, 10.1108/OIR-04-2020-0148 · DOI
  63. Kim, C., and Kim, K.-A. (2021). The Institutional Change from E-Government toward Smarter City; the Comparative Analysis between Royal Borough of Greenwich, UK and Seongdong-gu, South Korea. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7. · DOI
  64. Das, 2021, Pandemic in a smart city: Singapore’s COVID-19 management through technology & society, Urban Geogr., 42, 408, 10.1080/02723638.2020.1807168 · DOI
  65. Nesti, 2020, The democratic anchorage of governance networks in smart cities: An empirical assessment, Public Manag. Rev., 22, 648, 10.1080/14719037.2019.1588355 · DOI
  66. Chatterjee, 2018, Effects of successful adoption of information technology enabled services in proposed smart cities of India: From user experience perspective, J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag., 9, 189, 10.1108/JSTPM-03-2017-0008 · DOI
  67. Waladali, 2022, Impact of e-government maturity on public servants’ job satisfaction, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 20, 501
  68. Aswar, 2023, An investigation of the factors affecting citizens’ adoption of e-government in Indonesia, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 21, 187
  69. Digel, 2022, Evaluating development prospects of smart cities: Cluster analysis of Kazakhstan’s regions, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 20, 76
  70. Sierdovski, M., Pilatti, L.A., Rubbo, P., Ferras, R.A.R., Bittencourt, J.V.M., and Pagani, R.N. (2022, January 19–23). Support from governance, leadership and smart people in the context of smart cities development. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE/ITMC 2022 and 31st International Association for Management of Technology, IAMOT 2022 Joint Conference, Nancy, France. · DOI
  71. Vysochyna, 2022, Impact of municipal financial resilience on sustainable economic development: Case of Ukraine, Rev. Econ. Financ., 20, 662, 10.55365/1923.x2022.20.77 · DOI
  72. Yoshimori, 2022, An Education Gift—Integrated Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills—For Future Generations to Grow the Economy in the Digital Phase, SocioEconomic Chall., 6, 5, 10.21272/sec.6(2).5-18.2022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kuzior, A., Pakhnenko, O., Tiutiunyk, I., & Lyeonov, S.
Affiliations
  • Silesian University of Technology (PL)
  • Department of Financial Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine
  • Sumy State University (UA)
Corresponding author
Kuzior, Aleksandra
ORCID
Venue
Smart Cities
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-30
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
1663-1689
ISSN
2624-6511 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/smartcities6040078
OpenAlex
W4382936590
Cited by
72
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Smart Cities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Electronic Sumy State University Institutional Repository (Sumy State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0122U000774, 0123U101945, 0121U100469, 13/020/BK_23/0081)
  • the Department of Applied Social Sciences of the Faculty of Organization and Management of the Silesian University of Technology (0122U000774, 0123U101945, 0121U100469, 13/020/BK_23/0081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Policy Issues
Keywords
digital governance, e-government, Human Development Index, GNI per capita, information technology, economic indicators, social indicators, political indicators, clustering, vector error correction model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review