Cited by 20Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Sex Differences in Athletic Performance Response to the Imagery and Mental Toughness of Elite Middle- and Long-Distance Runners

Open access
Yarayan, Yunus Emre, Solmaz, Serdar, Aslan, Mehdi, Batrakoulis, Alexios, Al-Mhanna, Sameer Badri, Keskin, Kadir·2024·Sports

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference between the levels of imagery and mental toughness in the context of sports performance in male and female athletes. A total of 344 track and field athletes, 205 male (59.6%, 23.3 ± 4.0 years) and 139 female (40.4%, 22.9 ± 4.0 years), voluntarily participated in the study. Imagery Inventory and Mental Toughness Inventory in Sport were used as data collection tools in the study. In the evaluation of athletic performance, athletes were asked about their ranks in the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 and were categorized according to the scoring tables specified by the International Association of Athletics Federation. A MANOVA analysis was used to determine whether there was a difference between low (−2% to +5%), medium (+6 to +11%), and high (+12 to +17%) performers among male and female athletes, and a post hoc analysis was used to determine the source of the difference. According to the present findings, there was no significant difference between the imagery and mental toughness levels of athletes with high, medium, and low performance among male athletes. On the contrary, a significant difference was detected between the imagery and mental toughness levels of female athletes with medium and high performances, showing that athletes in the high-performance range had higher levels of imagery (Eta2 = 8) and mental toughness (Eta2 = 10) than athletes in the medium- and low-performance ranges. The findings of this study show that imagery and emotional intelligence are important factors for sports performance. In this context, coaches and sports psychologists can include these parameters in their training programs to achieve the optimal performance range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sports12060141

Cites

67 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elite athletes may derive greater benefit from imagery due to higher performance experience and psychological preparedness.

    “Elite athletes may derive greater benefit from imagery due to higher performance experience and psychological preparedness [112–114].”

    From The Effect of Different Psychological Interventions on Athletes' Competitive Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. (2026) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report higher imagery levels among high-performing female athletes and note that imagery’s effect may vary with experience. They do not show that elite athletes benefit more than less-experienced athletes, or that greater benefit is due to performance experience and psychological preparedness; the study found no significant relationship in men. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [7]Zinsser N. Bunker L. Williams J.M. Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 2010 Volume 5 305 335 Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313668911_Cognitive_techniques_for_building_confidence_and_enhancing_performance (accessed on 12 January 2024)
  2. [13]Akandere M. Aktaş S. Er Y. Zihinsel Antrenman ve Spor Türkiye Barolar Birliği Ankara, Turkey 2018 74 Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327816863 (accessed on 16 January 2024)
  3. [20]Hardy L. Jones G. Gould D. Understanding Psychological Preparation for Sport: Theory and Practice of Elite Performers John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2018 53 58
  4. [33]Bernstein D.A. Borkovec T.D. Hazlett-Stevens H. New Directions in Progressive Relaxation Training: A Guidebook for Helping Professionals Greenwood Publishing Group Westport, CT, USA 2000 13 138 Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-03365-000 (accessed on 8 February 2024)
  5. [36]Williams J.M.E. Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance Mayfield Publishing Company Mountain View, CA, USA 1993 45 54 Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-98291-000 (accessed on 15 February 2024)
  6. [37]Murphy S. Nordin S. Cumming J. Imagery in Sport, Exercise, and Dance Human Kinetics Champaign, IL, USA 2008 120 Available online: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-01583-013 (accessed on 26 February 2024)
  7. [49]Creswell J.W. Creswell J.D. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2017 121
  8. [50]Fraenkel J.R. Wallen N.E. Hyun H.H. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education McGraw-Hill Columbus, OH, USA 2012 88
  9. [51]Spiriev B. IAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics. Revised Edition 2017 1 360 Available online: https://www.worldathletics.org/ (accessed on 9 March 2024)
  10. [57]Tabachnick B.G. Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 6th ed. Pearson Boston, MA, USA 2007 156

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yarayan, Y. E., Solmaz, S., Aslan, M., Batrakoulis, A., Al-Mhanna, S. B., & Keskin, K.
Affiliations
  • Siirt Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Batman University (TR)
  • University of Thessaly (GR)
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Gazi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Keskin, Kadir
Venue
Sports
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-05-23
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
141
ISSN
2075-4663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4398253114
Cited by
20
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
sex differences, mental imagery, mental toughness, athletic performance, middle-distance running, long-distance running, track and field athletes, elite athletes, emotional intelligence, performance ranking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review