Cited by 176Bioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceSustainable Development and Environmental Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A path transition towards a bioeconomy–the crucial role of sustainability

Open access

Abstract

The bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, we analyze current bioeconomy strategies and trends to point out potential sustainability conflicts and transition challenges. Our analysis shows that the bioeconomy is not sustainable per se, as mere input substitution may entail welfare losses. Instead, it requires further debates and actions to avoid exacerbation of ecological and social strains. Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy and predominantly requires (1) sustainability of the resource base and (2) sustainability of processes and products, especially by (3) circular processes of material fluxes, not least to gain consumer acceptance for bio-based products. Otherwise, the bioeconomy would only entail the substitution of fossil resources for bio-based resources potentially lacking the generation of additional societal and ecological benefits and contribution to climate mitigation. As markets alone will not suffice to fulfil this path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy, we argue that innovative governance is necessary to reduce competitive drawbacks compared to fossil resources (enabling function) and to secure ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements (limiting function).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11113005

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 135 references

41 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Ober, S. (2014). Nachhaltigkeit in der Bioökonomie. Zusammenfassung und Thesen als Ergebnis eines Workshops auf Vilm 2013, NABU—Bundesverband Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) e.V.
  2. 2014, Bioeconomy–A dead end, Rural 21, 3, 34
  3. Wagner, 2015, Bioökonomie–Über die Pervertierung eines grünen Paradigmas, Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie (ZfSÖ), 52, 57
  4. 2014, Bioeconomy and sustainable development–dimensions, Rural 21, 2, 6
  5. Lewandowski, I. (2018). Bioeconomy Concepts. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy, Springer. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  6. European Commission (2005). New Perspectives on the Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy, European Commission. Conference Report.
  7. Gonzales, N.C. (2016, January 16–17). Regulation of bio based economy. The challenges of the local innovation in governance. Proceedings of the Conference Paper for 5th AIEAA-Conference, The Changing Role of Regulation in the Bio-Based Economy, Bologna, Italy.
  8. Pietzsch, J. (2017). Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, Springer. [1st ed.].
  9. Keil, R., Robinet, K., and Todt, A. (2015). Ressourceneffizienz, Ressourcensubstitution und biologische Vielfalt. Ressourcen Schonen–Biologische Vielfalt Erhalten. Chancen und Risiken von Rohstoffsubstitutionen für die Biologische Vielfalt, Oekom. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  10. Ludwig, 2017, Bauen mit Holz als Beitrag zum Klima-und Ressourcenschutz–Status quo des Rechtsrahmens und Gestaltungsvorschläge, Die öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV), 23, 985
  11. Dederich, L. (2015, January 24). Resource Efficient Buildings. Innovative Biobased Products: Opportunities for Substituting Non-Renewable Resources. Proceedings of the Presentation on G7-Alliance on Resource Efficiency, Berlin, Germany.
  12. Krippner, R. (2004). Untersuchungen zu Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Holzleichtbeton im Bereich von Gebäudefassaden. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München].
  13. Homami, 2013, Preparation of Wood Plastic Composite from Polyethylene and Bagasse, Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 14, 453
  14. Carus, M., Eder, A., Dammer, L., Korte, H., Scholz, L., Essel, R., Breitmayer, E., and Barth, M. (2019, May 10). Wood-Plastic Composites (WPC) and Natural Fibre Composites (NFC): European and Global Markets 2012 and Future Trends in Automotive and Construction. WPC/NFC Market Study 2014-10 (Update 2015-06). Nova market study 2015. Available online: https://compositesuk.co.uk/system/files/documents/WPC-NFC-Market-Study-Short-Verson%202015.pdf. · DOI
  15. Ludwig, 2015, Der Rechtsrahmen für die Bioökonomie in Deutschland, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV), 68, 41
  16. Hagemann, N., Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., and Hauck, J. (2016). Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: A scenario analysis for Germany. Sustainability, 8. · DOI
  17. Lewandowski, I. (2018). Sustainable Development and Sustainability Management. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy, Springer. [1st ed.]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–139 of 139

Metadata

Authors
Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Gawel, Erik
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3005
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946868949
Cited by
176
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
FWCI
37.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031A078A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
Keywords
bioeconomy, bioproducts, circular economy, welfare loss, fossil resource substitution, consumer acceptance, bioeconomy governance, climate change mitigation, sustainability conflicts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review