The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap
Open accessAbstract
As the rapid economic growth and over-consumption within the largest population worldwide has resulted in harmful environment deterioration, a shift to more sustainable consumption behaviors is required in China. Although public interests in sustainability have increased and consumers’ attitudes are positive, their behavioral intentions are not consistent with attitudes. This study aims to uncover psychological drivers and barriers (consumption values, social norms, and attitudes to sustainable apparel products) of Chinese consumers’ behavioral intentions toward sustainable apparel products (SAP) by exploring the attitude–behavioral intention gap. Online survey data were used to examine the moderating impacts of consumption values and social norms on relationship between Chinese consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward SAP. Results from moderating regression analysis suggest that (1) Chinese consumers’ SAP attitudes had a strong positive effect on the purchase intention toward SAP, (2) aesthetic values positively moderated the relationship between the SAP attitude and purchase intention, whereas conspicuous values negatively moderated the relationship, and (3) utility values and social norms did not show any significant moderating influences on the relationship between the SAP attitude and purchase intention. Our study validates the attitude–behavior gap model in sustainable consumer behavior and discusses how the current findings can assist researchers and practitioners in the Clothing and Textiles field alike to fine-tune sustainable programs and marketing strategies in China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9781410610904 · Cited by 6,235
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298204600314 · Cited by 5,616
An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values
Schwartz, S. H. (2012) · Online Readings in Psychology and Culture · doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116 · Cited by 4,147 · cited 3×
“Values motivate action, giving t direction and em tional intensity [28] (Schwartz, 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialPredicting and Changing Behavior
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838020 · Cited by 2,807
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015) · International Strategic Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001 · Cited by 1,518
The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms
Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482 · Cited by 1,282
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029 · Cited by 802
Cited by
Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review
Zhang, X., & Dong, F. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186607 · Cited by 337
Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review
Sharma, K., Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3237 · Cited by 325
Bi, N. C., & Zhang, R. (2023) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-08-2021-0214 · Cited by 170
Riskos, K., Dekoulou, P. (., Mylonas, N., & Tsourvakas, G. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13126867 · Cited by 116
Purchase Behavior of Consumers Toward GSAs: A Longitudinal Assessment
Chakraborty, D. (2023) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2022.2123065 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., & Oh, K. W.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-02-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1770
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010336582
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 26.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su12051770
- The paper
- Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051770
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.