Cited by 96Insect Utilization and EffectsComposting and Vermicomposting TechniquesAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management

Evaluation of Fertilizer Value of Residues Obtained after Processing Household Organic Waste with Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens)

Open access
Kawasaki, Kiyonori, Kawasaki, Toshiya, Hirayasu, Hirofumi, Matsumoto, Yoshiki, Fujitani, Yasuhiro·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

The residue generated by the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens, BSF) during the processing of organic waste is considered a suitable crop fertilizer. However, no detailed studies have investigated the fertilizer value of the residue obtained from processing household organic waste. In this study, experimental household organic waste (EHOW) was processed by BSF at 200 mg of EHOW per head for 15 days at 27 °C. To evaluate the fertilizer value of the obtained BSF larvae production residue (BSFR), the chemical composition and microbiota were analyzed, and Komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. perviridis) cultivation tests were conducted. BSFR results demonstrated higher ammonium nitrogen and lower nitrate nitrogen, and the highest above-ground dry matter weight of Komatsuna. Although the relative abundance of Escherichia was low, the relative abundance of Xanthomonadaceae, which contains a genus that causes disease in plants, was high. Therefore, the presence of plant pathogens in the BSFR microbiota should be considered. Finally, the effects of BSFR on the external environment requires more detailed investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12124920

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawasaki, K., Kawasaki, T., Hirayasu, H., Matsumoto, Y., & Fujitani, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kagawa University (JP)
  • Research Institute of Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries, Osaka Prefecture (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Kawasaki, Kiyonori
  • Matsumoto, Yoshiki
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
4920
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034718364
Cited by
92
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (1-1604))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, household organic waste, fertilizer value, composting, ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, komatsuna, Brassica rapa var. perviridis, Xanthomonadaceae, Escherichia, crop growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review