Cited by 23Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Heat Island MitigationUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Nature-Based Solutions Forming Urban Intervention Approaches to Anthropogenic Climate Change: A Quantitative Literature Review

Open access
Parker, Jackie, Simpson, Greg D, Miller, Jonathon Edward·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

Discussion around anthropogenic climate change has occurred for over 100 years. However, in recent decades, these discussions have intensified due to increased confidence in scientific research highlighting adverse effects, increased knowledge breadth in climate science, and heightened public and political awareness and engagement on the topic. Climate change is now acknowledged as one of the biggest challenges and threats to modern lifestyles. Nature-based solutions (NBS), as a mediator and mitigator to adverse climate change effects, is an emerging area of expanding research collateral and practitioner literacy. To highlight current NBS knowledge, existing knowledge gaps, and research trends, a Quantitative Systematic Literature Review (QSLR) was undertaken (n = 54). This QSLR reveals the short temporal span of articles relating to NBS as a response to climate change, with most articles being of a research style format. NBS research focus areas were found to be dominated by ecological and infrastructure approaches to climate change mitigation, and ecological and technical positions were found to be most topical across the current climate change literature. Multiple knowledge gaps were identified by the review, namely the lack of broader conceptual approaches and knowledge acquisition regarding climate change responses via NBS, as well as the psychological relationship humans share with NBS and climate change, adverse or otherwise. These knowledge gaps highlight where future research inquiry may be directed to increase the value and completion of this research area. It is hoped that this QSLR will assist in increasing the profile of NBS in the multidisciplinary and complex response to anthropogenic climate change, as well as contribute to the growth in investment and implementation of NBS assets for a rigid and resilient global future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12187439

Cites

53 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on NbS often focuses on their design yet fails to quantify their performance, particularly in relation to climate adaptation and resilience.

    “Research on NbS often focuses on their design yet fails to quantify their performance, particularly in relation to climate adaptation and resilience (39).”

    From Global synthesis and regional insights for mainstreaming urban nature-based solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction (section 1; page unavailable) identifies a lack of practical, viable, quantifiable research on NbS to inform climate-change interventions. Section 5.6 likewise says ideas lack verification and validation. Neither passage establishes that research often focuses on design, or specifically identifies a failure to quantify performance for climate adaptation and resilience. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, J., Simpson, G. D., & Miller, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • School of Science and Engineering University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
Corresponding author
Parker, Jackie
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-10
Volume
12
Issue
18
Pages
7439
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084395660
Cited by
23
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
nature-based solutions, anthropogenic climate change, urban climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, urban infrastructure, ecological approach, knowledge gaps, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review