Cited by 26Transportation and Mobility InnovationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Preparing Society for Automated Vehicles: Perceptions of the Importance and Urgency of Emerging Issues of Governance, Regulations, and Wider Impacts

Open access
Chen, Su-Yen, Kuo, Hsin-Yu, Lee, Chiachun·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

This study explores the overall picture of how people perceive the importance level and urgency level regarding issues associated with automated vehicles, by sorting out ten issues, developing a questionnaire with 66 measurement items, and investigating how Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts and Computer Science (CS)/Electrical Engineering (EE) majors assessed these issues. The findings suggest that AI experts in Taiwan believed that the top five issues for preparing a society for autonomous vehicles (AVs) should include (1) data privacy and cybersecurity, (2) regulation considerations, (3) infrastructure, (4) governance, and (5) public acceptance. On the other hand, for their student counterparts, the results (1) demonstrate a somewhat different order from the third to the fifth place, (2) show an attention-focused profile on the issue of cybersecurity and data privacy, and (3) indicate that gender and a few wider-impact variables (technology innovation, infrastructure) are significant predictors for the assessment on the importance level of AVs, while some wider-impact variables (technology innovation, governance, economic benefits, infrastructure), which are positively associated, as well as concerns variables (cybersecurity and data privacy, regulations), which are negatively associated, could be predictors for the urgency level of AVs. Suggestions for future research and policymakers are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12197844

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Allen & Overy LLP. Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Navigating the Legal Issues; Allen & Overy LLP: London, UK, 2017; pp. 2-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, S.-Y., Kuo, H.-Y., & Lee, C.
Affiliations
National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Su-Yen
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
12
Issue
19
Pages
7844
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3089226300
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China (MOST 109-2634-F-007 -011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, public perception, societal preparedness, governance, regulation, data privacy, cybersecurity, public acceptance, infrastructure, university students, gender differences, technological innovation, economic benefits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review