The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience
Open accessAbstract
Nowadays, the buzzwords for organizations to be prepared for the competitive environment’s challenges are sustainability, digitalization, resilience and agility. However, despite the fact that these concepts have come into common use at the level of both scholars and practitioners, the nature of the relation between sustainability and resilience has not yet been sufficiently clarified. Above all, there is still no evidence of what factors determine greater resilience to change in an organization that also wants to be more sustainable, especially in times of crisis and discontinuity. This research aims to explore from a theoretical point of view, through the construction of a conceptual model, how these dimensions interact to help the business to become strategically resilient by leveraging digitization and agility as enablers. A new view of resilience arises from the study, which goes beyond the well-known ability to absorb or adapt to adversity, to also include a strategic attribute that could help companies capture change-related opportunities to design new ways of doing business under stress. A key set of strategically agile processes, enabled by digitalization, creates strategic resilience that also includes a proactive, opportunity-focused attitude in the face of change. Strategic resilience to lead to organizational sustainability must be understood as a multi-domain concept quite similar to the holistic view of sustainability: environment, economy and society. Finally, the research offers a set of propositions and a theoretical framework that can be empirically validated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines
Snyder, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 · Cited by 11,524
Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C., & Walker, B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35098000 · Cited by 7,510
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132319 · Cited by 7,449
From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., & Abel, N. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 · Cited by 3,496
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13 · Cited by 2,317
REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM
Gersick, C. J. G. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4278988 · Cited by 2,183
Adaptation to Environmental Change: Contributions of a Resilience Framework
Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348 · Cited by 2,142
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12076 · Cited by 1,682
(2015) · Cited by 1,282
Cited by
The digital divide: A review and future research agenda
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359 · Cited by 1,044
How does digital transformation improve organizational resilience?—findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA
Zhang, J., Long, J., & von Schaewen, A. M. E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132011487 · Cited by 245
Zhang, J., & Qi, L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18105456 · Cited by 42
Masudin, I., Habibah, I. Z., Wardana, R. W., Restuputri, D. P., & Shariff, S. S. R. (2024) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics8030074 · Cited by 26
Definitions of Sustainable Leadership in Education: A Systematic Review and Analysis
Ali Mohammad Al-khamaiseh, R., Bailey, R. P., & Jarvis, A. (2025) · Journal of Research on Leadership Education · doi:10.1177/19427751241283029 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Miceli, A., Hagen, B., Riccardi, M. P., Sotti, F., & Settembre-Blundo, D.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-02-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2052
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3130514315
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 49.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su13042052
- The paper
- Miceli, A., Hagen, B., Riccardi, M. P., Sotti, F., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2021). Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.