The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment
Open accessAbstract
The widespread adoption of remote and hybrid work due to COVID-19 calls for studies that explore the ramifications of these scenarios for office workers from an occupational health and wellbeing perspective. This paper aims to identify the needs and challenges in remote and hybrid work and the potential for a sustainable future work environment. Data collection involved two qualitative studies with a total of 53 participants, who represented employees, staff managers, and service/facility providers at three Swedish public service organisations (primarily healthcare and infrastructure administration). The results describe opportunities and challenges with the adoption of remote and hybrid work from individual, group, and leadership perspectives. The main benefits of remote work were increased flexibility, autonomy, work-life balance and individual performance, while major challenges were social aspects such as lost comradery and isolation. Hybrid work was perceived to provide the best of both worlds of remote and office work, given that employees and managers develop new skills and competencies to adjust to new ways of working. To achieve the expected individual and organisational benefits of hybrid work, employers are expected to provide support and flexibility and re-design the physical and digital workplaces to fit the new and diverse needs of employees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940710733115 · Cited by 12,996
An integrative model of organizational trust: past, present, and future
Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24348410 · Cited by 2,794
The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion
ANTONOVSKY, A. (1996) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/11.1.11 · Cited by 2,647
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991
Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue.
Bailenson, J. N. (2021) · Technology, Mind, and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000030 · Cited by 1,203
The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers
Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., et al. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4 · Cited by 789
Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach
Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2018.1541886 · Cited by 743
Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook
Schwandt, T. A. (1996) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(96)88232-2 · Cited by 740
Why Working from Home Will Stick
Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. (2021) · doi:10.3386/w28731 · Cited by 641
Cited by
Employee Well-being, Remote Work, and Productivity in Hybrid Work Models
Sulaiman, A. S., & Onah, I. L. (2025) · Journal of Business Development and Management Research · doi:10.70382/ajbdmr.v10i7.055 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-28
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 294
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200449481
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 70.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su14010294
- The paper
- Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2021). Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.