Cited by 79Corporate Management and LeadershipOrganizational Learning and LeadershipInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning

Open access
Mollah, Md Alamgir, Choi, Jae-Hyeok, Hwang, Su-Jung, Shin, Jin-Kyo·2023·Sustainability

Abstract

In the age of Industry 4.0, the emergence of new technologies is compelling organizations to search for new methods for sustainability. In particular, IT capabilities and organizational learning competencies with digital leadership play crucial roles in managing environmental dynamism, which are profoundly related to sustainable organizational performance in the digital age. This study explored sustainable organizational performance from the perspective of digital leadership (DL) and the role of IT capabilities (IT infrastructure, IT business spanning, IT-proactive stance), as well as organizational learning in sustainable organizational performance. For this research, data from 173 employees from South Korean organizations were collected using an online survey on digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, and sustainable organizational performance (SOP). Here, an SPSS- and AMOS-based structural equation modeling technique was used to examine the outcomes for analysis. The results confirmed that digital leadership significantly directly affected SOP. Moreover, there was no mediating effect of IT infrastructure and IT business spanning; however, an IT-proactive stance and organizational learning fully mediated the relationship between DL and SOP. This research will aid leadership behavior alongside other knowledge-based studies that empirically tested the role of digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, and SOP. As digital leadership competencies demand is surging for managing digital challenges alongside the verification of digital leadership behavior and knowledge-based theory, the important role of DL regarding IT capabilities and organizational learning in SOP needs to be prudently considered in the South Korean context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15107875

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Peng, B. Digital Leadership: State Governance in the Era of Digital Technology. Cult. Sci. 2022, 5, 210-225. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Kamalaldin, A.; Linde, L.; Sjödin, D.; Parida, V. Transforming Provider-Customer Relationships in Digital Servitization: A Relational View on Digitalization. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 306-325. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Adie, B.U.; Tate, M.; Cho, W.; Valentine, E. Digital Leaders and Digital Leadership: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Virtual, 5-9 July 2022; Volume 115, pp. 1-17.
  4. Zada, I. Organizational Change Management: Leadership Roles in Adapting New Norms. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 2022, 7, 1-5. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Zeike, S.; Bradbury, K.; Lindert, L.; Pfaff, H. Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2628. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Shin, J.; Mollah, A.; Choi, J. Sustainability and Organizational Performance in South Korea: The Effect of Digital Leadership on Digital Culture and Employees' Digital Capabilities. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2027. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Mihardjo, L.; Sasmoko, S.; Alamsyah, F.; Elidjen, E. The Influence of Digital Leadership on Innovation Management Based on Dynamic Capability: Market Orientation as a Moderator. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 9, 1059-1070. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Amelda, B.; Alamsjah, F.; Elidjen, E. Does The Digital Marketing Capability of Indonesian Banks Align with Digital Leadership and Technology Capabilities on Company Performance? CommIT Commun. Inf. Technol. J. 2021, 15, 9-17. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Roberts, P.W. Product Innovation, Product-Market Competition and Persistent Profitability in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 20, 655-670. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Mihardjo, L.W.W.; Rukmana, R.A. Intervening Role of Innovation Management on Relationship between Digital Leadership and Dynamic Capability Accelerated by Collaboration. Int. J. Innov. 2019, 6, 17.
  11. Hensellek, S. Digital Leadership: A Framework for Successful Leadership in the Digital Age. J. Media Manag. Entrep. 2020, 2, 55-69. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Prince, K.A. Digital Leadership: Transitioning into the Digital Age; James Cook University: Douglas, Australia, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ross, J.W.; Beath, C.M.; Goodhue, D.L. Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 15 October 1996.
  14. Weill, P.; Subramani, M.; Broadbent, M. IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility. SSRN J. 2002, 1-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Lu, Y.; Ramamurthy, K. (Ram) Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 931-954. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mata, F.J.; Fuerst, W.L.; Barney, J.B. Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Q. 1995, 19, 487-505. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Wade, M.; Hulland, J. Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Q. 2004, 28, 107-142. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fichman, R.G. Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice. Inf. Syst. Res. 2004, 15, 132-154. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Galliers, J.; Wilson, S.; Fone, J. A Method for Determining Information Flow Breakdown in Clinical Systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, S113-S121. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Fiol, C.M.; Lyles, M.A. Organizational Learning. AMR 1985, 10, 803-813. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Brix, J. Ambidexterity and Organizational Learning: Revisiting and Reconnecting the Literatures. Learn. Organ. 2019, 26, 337-351. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Tran, H.Q.; Pham, N.T.B. Organizational Learning as a Moderator of the Effect of Employee Participation on Academic Results: An Empirical Study in Vietnam. Learn. Organ. 2019, 26, 146-159. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Raudeli ūnien ė, J.; Tvaronavičien ė, M.; Blažyt ė, M. Knowledge Management Practice in General Education Schools as a Tool for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4034. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Akram, M.S.; Goraya, M.A.S.; Malik, A.; Aljarallah, A.M. Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3816. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Athayde, S.; Silva-Lugo, J.; Schmink, M.; Kaiabi, A.; Heckenberger, M. Reconnecting Art and Science for Sustainability: Learning from Indigenous Knowledge through Participatory Action-Research in the Amazon. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Erhan, T.; Uzunbacak, H.H.; Aydin, E. From Conventional to Digital Leadership: Exploring Digitalization of Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Manag. Res. Rev. 2022, 45, 1524-1543. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Liao, S.; Fei, W.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwan's Knowledge-Intensive Industries. J. Inf. Sci. 2007, 33, 340-359. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Mihardjo, L.W.W.; Rukmana, R.A.N. Does Digital Leadership Impact Directly or Indirectly on Dynamic Capability: Case on Indonesia Telecommunication Industry in Digital Transformation? J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2018, 2, 832-841. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Borah, P.S.; Iqbal, S.; Akhtar, S. Linking Social Media Usage and SME's Sustainable Performance: The Role of Digital Leadership and Innovation Capabilities. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101900. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Sarfraz, M.; Ivascu, L.; Abdullah, M.I.; Ozturk, I.; Tariq, J. Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5945. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Giovando, G. Digital Workplace and Organization Performance: Moderating Role of Digital Leadership Capability. J. Innov. Knowl. 2023, 8, 100334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Benitez, J.; Arenas, A.; Castillo, A.; Esteves, J. Impact of Digital Leadership Capability on Innovation Performance: The Role of Platform Digitization Capability. Inf. Manag. 2022, 59, 103590. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  33. Artüz, S.D.; Bayraktar, O. The Effect of Relation between Digital Leadership Practice and Learning Organization on the Perception of Individual Performance. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos. Bilim. Derg. 2021, 20, 97-120. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Wu, S.; Gao, H. How Internal IT Capability Affects Open Innovation Performance: From Dynamic Capability Perspective. SAGE Open 2022, 12, 21582440211069389. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Rintala, N.; Suolanen, S. The Implications of Digitalization for Job Descriptions, Competencies and the Quality of Working Life. Nord. Rev. 2005, 26, 53-67. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Nwankpa, J.K.; Roumani, Y. IT Capability and Digital Transformation: A Firm Performance Perspective. In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, 11-14 December 2016.
  37. Makhloufi, L.; Laghouag, A.A.; Ali Sahli, A.; Belaid, F. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5399. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Gao, P.; Zhang, J.; Gong, Y.; Li, H. Effects of Technical IT Capabilities on Organizational Agility: The Moderating Role of IT Business Spanning Capability. IMDS 2020, 120, 941-961. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Ege, T.; Esen, A.; Dizdar, Ö. Organizational Learning and Learning Organizations: An Integrative Framework. Int. J. Manag. Econ. Bus. 2017, 13, 439-460. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. García-Morales, V.J.; Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M.M.; Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. Transformational Leadership Influence on Organiza- tional Performance through Organizational Learning and Innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1040-1050. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Hsiao, H.-C.; Chang, J.-C. The Role of Organizational Learning in Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2011, 12, 621-631. [CrossRef] · DOI
  42. Imran, M.K.; Ilyas, M.; Aslam, U.; Ubaid-Ur-Rahman, U.-U.-R. Organizational Learning through Transformational Leadership. TLO 2016, 23, 232-248. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Duncan, N.B. Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and Their Measure. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1995, 12, 37-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Earle, T. The Evolution of Chiefdoms. Curr. Anthropol. 1989, 30, 84-88. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Niederman, F.; Brancheau, J.C.; Wetherbe, J.C. Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s. MIS Q. 1991, 15, 475-500. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Akhtar, S.; Hongyun, T.; Iqbal, S.; Ashraf, S.F.; Bashir, I. Impact of Organization Learning Capability on Performance Innovation: Mediating Role of Information Technology. EParadigms 2021, 3, 146-150. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Alegre, J.; Chiva, R. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test. Technovation 2008, 28, 315-326. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Jonathan, G.M.; Rusu, L.; Grembergen, W.V. Business-IT Alignment and Digital Transformation: Setting a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2021), València, Spain, 8-10 September 2021.
  49. Yu, Z.; Xu, W.; Yu, L. Constructing an Online Sustainable Educational Model in COVID-19 Pandemic Environments. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3598. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Schilling, L.; Seuring, S. Sustainable Value Creation through Information Technology-Enabled Supply Chains in Emerging Markets. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 33, 1001-1016. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Hao, Q.; Kasper, H.; Mühlbacher, J. How Does Organizational Structure Influence Performance through Learning and Innovation in Austria and China. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2012, 6, 36-52. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Schön, D.; Argyris, C. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Read. Addison Wesley 1996, 305, 107-120.
  53. Inkpen, A.C.; Crossan, M.M. Believing Is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organization Learning. J. Manag. Stud. 1995, 32, 595-618. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Goh, S.; Richards, G. Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations. Eur. Manag. J. 1997, 15, 575-583. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Gomes, G.; Wojahn, R.M. Organizational Learning Capability, Innovation and Performance: Study in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMES). Rev. Adm. 2017, 52, 163-175. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. Colwill, J.; Townsend, J. Women, Leadership and Information Technology: The Impact of Women Leaders in Organizations and Their Role in Integrating Information Technology with Corporate Strategy. J. Manag. Dev. 1999, 18, 207-216. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Mohamed, D.S.M. Employee Performance as Affected by the Digital Training, the Digital Leadership, and Subjective Wellbeing during COVID-19. J. Posit. Sch. Psychol. 2022, 6, 540-553.
  58. Bustinza, O.F.; Molina, L.M.; Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.J. Outsourcing as Seen from the Perspective of Knowledge Management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46, 23-39. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Tirastittam, P.; Jermsittiparsert, K.; Waiyawuththanapoom, P.; Aunyawong, W. Strategic Leadership, Organizational Innovative- ness and the Firm Supply Performance: The Mediating Role of Information Technology Capability. Int. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 9, 291-299.
  60. Lisdiono, P.; Said, J.; Yusoff, H.; Hermawan, A.A.; Abdul Manan, D.I.b. Alliance Management Capabilities and Enterprise Resilience-The Mediating Role of Information Technology Capabilities: The Case of Indonesia's State-Owned Enterprises. Proceedings 2022, 82, 28. [CrossRef] · DOI
  61. Hutomo, A.; Haizam, M.; Sinaga, O. The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability On Green Distribution and Green Packaging Towards Sustainability Performance as A Function Environmental Dynamism: Indonesia and Malaysia Fishery Industries. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 164, 012018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Kordab, M.; Raudeli ūnien ė, J.; Meidut ė-Kavaliauskien ė, I. Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10061. [CrossRef] · DOI
  63. Akgün, A.E.; Ince, H.; Imamoglu, S.Z.; Keskin, H.; Kocoglu, ˙I. The Mediator Role of Learning Capability and Business Innovativeness between Total Quality Management and Financial Performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 888-901. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Aboramadan, M.; Dahleez, K.A.; Farao, C. Inclusive Leadership and Extra-Role Behaviors in Higher Education: Does Organiza- tional Learning Mediate the Relationship? Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2021, 36, 397-418. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. Kim, E.-J.; Park, S. The Role of Transformational Leadership in Citizenship Behavior: Organizational Learning and Interpersonal Trust as Mediators. Int. J. Manpow. 2019, 40, 1347-1360. [CrossRef] · DOI
  66. Silins, H.; Mulford, B. Schools as Learning Organisations: The Case for System, Teacherand Student Learning. J. Educ. Adm. 2002, 40, 425-446. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Slater, S.F.; Narver, J.C. Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. J. Mark. 1995, 59, 63-74. [CrossRef] · DOI
  68. Ulutaş, M. Bilişim liderli gi ölçe gi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Egitim Bilim. Derg. 2017, 47, 105-124. [CrossRef] · DOI
  69. Bharadwaj, A.; Sambamurthy, V.; Zmud, R. IT Capabilities: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Operationalization. In Proceedings of the ICIS 1999 Proceedings, Charlotte, NC, USA, 13-15 December 1999.
  70. Tavakol, M.; Dennick, R. Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2011, 2, 53-55. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  71. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-13-813263-7.
  72. Baumgartner, H.; Homburg, C. Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1996, 13, 139-161. [CrossRef] · DOI
  73. Doll, W.J.; Xia, W.; Torkzadeh, G. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Q. 1994, 18, 453-461. [CrossRef] · DOI
  74. Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411-423. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  75. Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. JAMS 1988, 16, 74-94. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  76. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382-388. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  77. Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173-1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  78. MacKinnon, D.P.; Luecken, L.J. How and for Whom? Mediation and Moderation in Health Psychology. Health Psychol. 2008, 27, S99-S100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  79. Hayes, A.F.; Preacher, K.J. Conditional Process Modeling: Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine Contingent Causal Processes. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 2nd ed.; Quantitative Methods in Education and the Behavioral Sciences: Issues, Research, and Teaching; IAP Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2013; pp. 219-266. ISBN 978-1-62396-244-9.
  80. Karippur, N.K.; Balaramachandran, P.R. Antecedents of Effective Digital Leadership of Enterprises in Asia Pacific. AJIS 2022, 26, 1-35. [CrossRef] · DOI
  81. Klus, M.F.; Müller, J. The Digital Leader: What One Needs to Master Today's Organisational Challenges. J. Bus. Econ. 2021, 91, 1189-1223. [CrossRef] · DOI
  82. Petry, T. Digital Leadership. In Knowledge Management in Digital Change: New Findings and Practical Cases; North, K., Maier, R., Haas, O., Eds.; Progress in IS; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 209-218. ISBN 978-3-319-73546-7.
  83. Temelkova, M. Skills for Digital Leadership-Prerequisite for Developing High-Tech Economy. Int. J. Adv. Res. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 50-75.
  84. Bruner, M.W.; McLaren, C.D.; Mertens, N.; Steffens, N.K.; Boen, F.; McKenzie, L.; Haslam, S.A.; Fransen, K. Identity Leadership and Social Identification within Sport Teams over a Season: A Social Network Analysis. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2022, 59, 102106. [CrossRef] · DOI
  85. Frankowska, M.; Rzeczycki, A. Reshaping Supply Chain Collaboration-The Role of Digital Leadership in a Networked Organization. In Proceedings of the Boosting Collaborative Networks 4.0; Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ortiz, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 353-364.
  86. Shah, S.S.; Patki, S.M. Getting Traditionally Rooted Indian Leadership to Embrace Digital Leadership: Challenges and Way Forward with Reference to LMX. Lead. Educ Pers. Interdiscip. J. 2020, 2, 29-40. [CrossRef] · DOI
  87. Bass, B.M.; Riggio, R.E. Transformational Leadership; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-1-135-61888-9.
  88. Chiva, R.; Alegre, J.; Lapiedra, R. Measuring Organisational Learning Capability among the Workforce. Int. J. Manpow. 2007, 28, 224-242. [CrossRef] · DOI
  89. Hult, G.T.M.; Ferrell, O.C. Global Organizational Learning Capacity in Purchasing: Construct and Measurement. J. Bus. Res. 1997, 40, 97-111. [CrossRef] · DOI
  90. Ona g, A.O.; Tepeci, M.; Başalp, A.A. Organizational Learning Capability and Its Impact on Firm Innovativeness. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 150, 708-717. [CrossRef] · DOI
  91. Zhang, M.; Sarker, S.; Sarker, S. Unpacking the Effect of IT Capability on the Performance of Export-Focused SMEs: A Report from China. Inf. Syst. J. 2008, 18, 357-380. [CrossRef] · DOI
  92. Sanders, N.R.; Premus, R. Modeling the Relationship between Firm It Capability, Collaboration, and Performance. J. Bus. Logist. 2005, 26, 1-23. [CrossRef] · DOI
  93. Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nevo, S.; Jin, J.; Wang, L.; Chow, W.S. IT Capability and Organizational Performance: The Roles of Business Process Agility and Environmental Factors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 23, 326-342. [CrossRef] 100. · DOI
  94. Baierle, I.C.; da Silva, F.T.; de Faria Correa, R.G.; Schaefer, J.L.; Da Costa, M.B.; Benitez, G.B.; Benitez Nara, E.O. Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11779.
  95. CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mollah, M. A., Choi, J.-H., Hwang, S.-J., & Shin, J.-K.
Affiliations
  • University of Barishal (BD)
  • School of Business Administration, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
  • Keimyung University (KR)
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-05-11
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
7875
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376279290
Cited by
79
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 3
FWCI
22.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, sustainable organizational performance, IT infrastructure, mediating effect, knowledge-based view, Industry 4.0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review