Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning
Open accessAbstract
In the age of Industry 4.0, the emergence of new technologies is compelling organizations to search for new methods for sustainability. In particular, IT capabilities and organizational learning competencies with digital leadership play crucial roles in managing environmental dynamism, which are profoundly related to sustainable organizational performance in the digital age. This study explored sustainable organizational performance from the perspective of digital leadership (DL) and the role of IT capabilities (IT infrastructure, IT business spanning, IT-proactive stance), as well as organizational learning in sustainable organizational performance. For this research, data from 173 employees from South Korean organizations were collected using an online survey on digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, and sustainable organizational performance (SOP). Here, an SPSS- and AMOS-based structural equation modeling technique was used to examine the outcomes for analysis. The results confirmed that digital leadership significantly directly affected SOP. Moreover, there was no mediating effect of IT infrastructure and IT business spanning; however, an IT-proactive stance and organizational learning fully mediated the relationship between DL and SOP. This research will aid leadership behavior alongside other knowledge-based studies that empirically tested the role of digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, and SOP. As digital leadership competencies demand is surging for managing digital challenges alongside the verification of digital leadership behavior and knowledge-based theory, the important role of DL regarding IT capabilities and organizational learning in SOP needs to be prudently considered in the South Korean context.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042 · see citing works
Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research
Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Rose, G. M. (2000) · Accounting, Management and Information Technologies · doi:10.1016/s0959-8022(99)00017-x · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 95
- Peng, B. Digital Leadership: State Governance in the Era of Digital Technology. Cult. Sci. 2022, 5, 210-225. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kamalaldin, A.; Linde, L.; Sjödin, D.; Parida, V. Transforming Provider-Customer Relationships in Digital Servitization: A Relational View on Digitalization. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 89, 306-325. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Adie, B.U.; Tate, M.; Cho, W.; Valentine, E. Digital Leaders and Digital Leadership: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Virtual, 5-9 July 2022; Volume 115, pp. 1-17.
- Zada, I. Organizational Change Management: Leadership Roles in Adapting New Norms. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 2022, 7, 1-5. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zeike, S.; Bradbury, K.; Lindert, L.; Pfaff, H. Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2628. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Shin, J.; Mollah, A.; Choi, J. Sustainability and Organizational Performance in South Korea: The Effect of Digital Leadership on Digital Culture and Employees' Digital Capabilities. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2027. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mihardjo, L.; Sasmoko, S.; Alamsyah, F.; Elidjen, E. The Influence of Digital Leadership on Innovation Management Based on Dynamic Capability: Market Orientation as a Moderator. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 9, 1059-1070. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Amelda, B.; Alamsjah, F.; Elidjen, E. Does The Digital Marketing Capability of Indonesian Banks Align with Digital Leadership and Technology Capabilities on Company Performance? CommIT Commun. Inf. Technol. J. 2021, 15, 9-17. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Roberts, P.W. Product Innovation, Product-Market Competition and Persistent Profitability in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 20, 655-670. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mihardjo, L.W.W.; Rukmana, R.A. Intervening Role of Innovation Management on Relationship between Digital Leadership and Dynamic Capability Accelerated by Collaboration. Int. J. Innov. 2019, 6, 17.
- Hensellek, S. Digital Leadership: A Framework for Successful Leadership in the Digital Age. J. Media Manag. Entrep. 2020, 2, 55-69. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Prince, K.A. Digital Leadership: Transitioning into the Digital Age; James Cook University: Douglas, Australia, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Ross, J.W.; Beath, C.M.; Goodhue, D.L. Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets. MIT Sloan Management Review, 15 October 1996.
- Weill, P.; Subramani, M.; Broadbent, M. IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility. SSRN J. 2002, 1-29. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lu, Y.; Ramamurthy, K. (Ram) Understanding the Link Between Information Technology Capability and Organizational Agility: An Empirical Examination. MIS Q. 2011, 35, 931-954. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Mata, F.J.; Fuerst, W.L.; Barney, J.B. Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Q. 1995, 19, 487-505. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wade, M.; Hulland, J. Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Q. 2004, 28, 107-142. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Fichman, R.G. Real Options and IT Platform Adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice. Inf. Syst. Res. 2004, 15, 132-154. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Galliers, J.; Wilson, S.; Fone, J. A Method for Determining Information Flow Breakdown in Clinical Systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007, 76, S113-S121. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fiol, C.M.; Lyles, M.A. Organizational Learning. AMR 1985, 10, 803-813. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Brix, J. Ambidexterity and Organizational Learning: Revisiting and Reconnecting the Literatures. Learn. Organ. 2019, 26, 337-351. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Tran, H.Q.; Pham, N.T.B. Organizational Learning as a Moderator of the Effect of Employee Participation on Academic Results: An Empirical Study in Vietnam. Learn. Organ. 2019, 26, 146-159. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Raudeli ūnien ė, J.; Tvaronavičien ė, M.; Blažyt ė, M. Knowledge Management Practice in General Education Schools as a Tool for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4034. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Akram, M.S.; Goraya, M.A.S.; Malik, A.; Aljarallah, A.M. Organizational Performance and Sustainability: Exploring the Roles of IT Capabilities and Knowledge Management Capabilities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3816. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Athayde, S.; Silva-Lugo, J.; Schmink, M.; Kaiabi, A.; Heckenberger, M. Reconnecting Art and Science for Sustainability: Learning from Indigenous Knowledge through Participatory Action-Research in the Amazon. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Erhan, T.; Uzunbacak, H.H.; Aydin, E. From Conventional to Digital Leadership: Exploring Digitalization of Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior. Manag. Res. Rev. 2022, 45, 1524-1543. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Liao, S.; Fei, W.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Knowledge Sharing, Absorptive Capacity, and Innovation Capability: An Empirical Study of Taiwan's Knowledge-Intensive Industries. J. Inf. Sci. 2007, 33, 340-359. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mihardjo, L.W.W.; Rukmana, R.A.N. Does Digital Leadership Impact Directly or Indirectly on Dynamic Capability: Case on Indonesia Telecommunication Industry in Digital Transformation? J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2018, 2, 832-841. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Borah, P.S.; Iqbal, S.; Akhtar, S. Linking Social Media Usage and SME's Sustainable Performance: The Role of Digital Leadership and Innovation Capabilities. Technol. Soc. 2022, 68, 101900. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sarfraz, M.; Ivascu, L.; Abdullah, M.I.; Ozturk, I.; Tariq, J. Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Performance in Manufacturing Firms: The Interplay between Innovation Capabilities, Green Process, Product Innovations and Digital Leadership. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5945. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Giovando, G. Digital Workplace and Organization Performance: Moderating Role of Digital Leadership Capability. J. Innov. Knowl. 2023, 8, 100334. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Benitez, J.; Arenas, A.; Castillo, A.; Esteves, J. Impact of Digital Leadership Capability on Innovation Performance: The Role of Platform Digitization Capability. Inf. Manag. 2022, 59, 103590. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Artüz, S.D.; Bayraktar, O. The Effect of Relation between Digital Leadership Practice and Learning Organization on the Perception of Individual Performance. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos. Bilim. Derg. 2021, 20, 97-120. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wu, S.; Gao, H. How Internal IT Capability Affects Open Innovation Performance: From Dynamic Capability Perspective. SAGE Open 2022, 12, 21582440211069389. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rintala, N.; Suolanen, S. The Implications of Digitalization for Job Descriptions, Competencies and the Quality of Working Life. Nord. Rev. 2005, 26, 53-67. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nwankpa, J.K.; Roumani, Y. IT Capability and Digital Transformation: A Firm Performance Perspective. In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, 11-14 December 2016.
- Makhloufi, L.; Laghouag, A.A.; Ali Sahli, A.; Belaid, F. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5399. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gao, P.; Zhang, J.; Gong, Y.; Li, H. Effects of Technical IT Capabilities on Organizational Agility: The Moderating Role of IT Business Spanning Capability. IMDS 2020, 120, 941-961. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ege, T.; Esen, A.; Dizdar, Ö. Organizational Learning and Learning Organizations: An Integrative Framework. Int. J. Manag. Econ. Bus. 2017, 13, 439-460. [CrossRef] · DOI
- García-Morales, V.J.; Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M.M.; Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. Transformational Leadership Influence on Organiza- tional Performance through Organizational Learning and Innovation. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1040-1050. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hsiao, H.-C.; Chang, J.-C. The Role of Organizational Learning in Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2011, 12, 621-631. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Imran, M.K.; Ilyas, M.; Aslam, U.; Ubaid-Ur-Rahman, U.-U.-R. Organizational Learning through Transformational Leadership. TLO 2016, 23, 232-248. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Duncan, N.B. Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and Their Measure. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 1995, 12, 37-57. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Earle, T. The Evolution of Chiefdoms. Curr. Anthropol. 1989, 30, 84-88. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Niederman, F.; Brancheau, J.C.; Wetherbe, J.C. Information Systems Management Issues for the 1990s. MIS Q. 1991, 15, 475-500. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Akhtar, S.; Hongyun, T.; Iqbal, S.; Ashraf, S.F.; Bashir, I. Impact of Organization Learning Capability on Performance Innovation: Mediating Role of Information Technology. EParadigms 2021, 3, 146-150. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Alegre, J.; Chiva, R. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Learning Capability on Product Innovation Performance: An Empirical Test. Technovation 2008, 28, 315-326. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Jonathan, G.M.; Rusu, L.; Grembergen, W.V. Business-IT Alignment and Digital Transformation: Setting a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2021), València, Spain, 8-10 September 2021.
- Yu, Z.; Xu, W.; Yu, L. Constructing an Online Sustainable Educational Model in COVID-19 Pandemic Environments. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3598. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schilling, L.; Seuring, S. Sustainable Value Creation through Information Technology-Enabled Supply Chains in Emerging Markets. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 33, 1001-1016. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hao, Q.; Kasper, H.; Mühlbacher, J. How Does Organizational Structure Influence Performance through Learning and Innovation in Austria and China. Chin. Manag. Stud. 2012, 6, 36-52. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schön, D.; Argyris, C. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice. Read. Addison Wesley 1996, 305, 107-120.
- Inkpen, A.C.; Crossan, M.M. Believing Is Seeing: Joint Ventures and Organization Learning. J. Manag. Stud. 1995, 32, 595-618. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Goh, S.; Richards, G. Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations. Eur. Manag. J. 1997, 15, 575-583. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gomes, G.; Wojahn, R.M. Organizational Learning Capability, Innovation and Performance: Study in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMES). Rev. Adm. 2017, 52, 163-175. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Colwill, J.; Townsend, J. Women, Leadership and Information Technology: The Impact of Women Leaders in Organizations and Their Role in Integrating Information Technology with Corporate Strategy. J. Manag. Dev. 1999, 18, 207-216. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mohamed, D.S.M. Employee Performance as Affected by the Digital Training, the Digital Leadership, and Subjective Wellbeing during COVID-19. J. Posit. Sch. Psychol. 2022, 6, 540-553.
- Bustinza, O.F.; Molina, L.M.; Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L.J. Outsourcing as Seen from the Perspective of Knowledge Management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46, 23-39. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Tirastittam, P.; Jermsittiparsert, K.; Waiyawuththanapoom, P.; Aunyawong, W. Strategic Leadership, Organizational Innovative- ness and the Firm Supply Performance: The Mediating Role of Information Technology Capability. Int. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 9, 291-299.
- Lisdiono, P.; Said, J.; Yusoff, H.; Hermawan, A.A.; Abdul Manan, D.I.b. Alliance Management Capabilities and Enterprise Resilience-The Mediating Role of Information Technology Capabilities: The Case of Indonesia's State-Owned Enterprises. Proceedings 2022, 82, 28. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hutomo, A.; Haizam, M.; Sinaga, O. The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capability On Green Distribution and Green Packaging Towards Sustainability Performance as A Function Environmental Dynamism: Indonesia and Malaysia Fishery Industries. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 164, 012018. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kordab, M.; Raudeli ūnien ė, J.; Meidut ė-Kavaliauskien ė, I. Mediating Role of Knowledge Management in the Relationship between Organizational Learning and Sustainable Organizational Performance. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10061. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Akgün, A.E.; Ince, H.; Imamoglu, S.Z.; Keskin, H.; Kocoglu, ˙I. The Mediator Role of Learning Capability and Business Innovativeness between Total Quality Management and Financial Performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2014, 52, 888-901. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Aboramadan, M.; Dahleez, K.A.; Farao, C. Inclusive Leadership and Extra-Role Behaviors in Higher Education: Does Organiza- tional Learning Mediate the Relationship? Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2021, 36, 397-418. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kim, E.-J.; Park, S. The Role of Transformational Leadership in Citizenship Behavior: Organizational Learning and Interpersonal Trust as Mediators. Int. J. Manpow. 2019, 40, 1347-1360. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Silins, H.; Mulford, B. Schools as Learning Organisations: The Case for System, Teacherand Student Learning. J. Educ. Adm. 2002, 40, 425-446. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Slater, S.F.; Narver, J.C. Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. J. Mark. 1995, 59, 63-74. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ulutaş, M. Bilişim liderli gi ölçe gi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Egitim Bilim. Derg. 2017, 47, 105-124. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bharadwaj, A.; Sambamurthy, V.; Zmud, R. IT Capabilities: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Operationalization. In Proceedings of the ICIS 1999 Proceedings, Charlotte, NC, USA, 13-15 December 1999.
- Tavakol, M.; Dennick, R. Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2011, 2, 53-55. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2009; ISBN 978-0-13-813263-7.
- Baumgartner, H.; Homburg, C. Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review. Int. J. Res. Mark. 1996, 13, 139-161. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Doll, W.J.; Xia, W.; Torkzadeh, G. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. MIS Q. 1994, 18, 453-461. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411-423. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. JAMS 1988, 16, 74-94. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382-388. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173-1182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- MacKinnon, D.P.; Luecken, L.J. How and for Whom? Mediation and Moderation in Health Psychology. Health Psychol. 2008, 27, S99-S100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Hayes, A.F.; Preacher, K.J. Conditional Process Modeling: Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine Contingent Causal Processes. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 2nd ed.; Quantitative Methods in Education and the Behavioral Sciences: Issues, Research, and Teaching; IAP Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2013; pp. 219-266. ISBN 978-1-62396-244-9.
- Karippur, N.K.; Balaramachandran, P.R. Antecedents of Effective Digital Leadership of Enterprises in Asia Pacific. AJIS 2022, 26, 1-35. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Klus, M.F.; Müller, J. The Digital Leader: What One Needs to Master Today's Organisational Challenges. J. Bus. Econ. 2021, 91, 1189-1223. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Petry, T. Digital Leadership. In Knowledge Management in Digital Change: New Findings and Practical Cases; North, K., Maier, R., Haas, O., Eds.; Progress in IS; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 209-218. ISBN 978-3-319-73546-7.
- Temelkova, M. Skills for Digital Leadership-Prerequisite for Developing High-Tech Economy. Int. J. Adv. Res. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 50-75.
- Bruner, M.W.; McLaren, C.D.; Mertens, N.; Steffens, N.K.; Boen, F.; McKenzie, L.; Haslam, S.A.; Fransen, K. Identity Leadership and Social Identification within Sport Teams over a Season: A Social Network Analysis. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2022, 59, 102106. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Frankowska, M.; Rzeczycki, A. Reshaping Supply Chain Collaboration-The Role of Digital Leadership in a Networked Organization. In Proceedings of the Boosting Collaborative Networks 4.0; Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ortiz, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 353-364.
- Shah, S.S.; Patki, S.M. Getting Traditionally Rooted Indian Leadership to Embrace Digital Leadership: Challenges and Way Forward with Reference to LMX. Lead. Educ Pers. Interdiscip. J. 2020, 2, 29-40. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bass, B.M.; Riggio, R.E. Transformational Leadership; Psychology Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-1-135-61888-9.
- Chiva, R.; Alegre, J.; Lapiedra, R. Measuring Organisational Learning Capability among the Workforce. Int. J. Manpow. 2007, 28, 224-242. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hult, G.T.M.; Ferrell, O.C. Global Organizational Learning Capacity in Purchasing: Construct and Measurement. J. Bus. Res. 1997, 40, 97-111. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ona g, A.O.; Tepeci, M.; Başalp, A.A. Organizational Learning Capability and Its Impact on Firm Innovativeness. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 150, 708-717. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhang, M.; Sarker, S.; Sarker, S. Unpacking the Effect of IT Capability on the Performance of Export-Focused SMEs: A Report from China. Inf. Syst. J. 2008, 18, 357-380. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sanders, N.R.; Premus, R. Modeling the Relationship between Firm It Capability, Collaboration, and Performance. J. Bus. Logist. 2005, 26, 1-23. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nevo, S.; Jin, J.; Wang, L.; Chow, W.S. IT Capability and Organizational Performance: The Roles of Business Process Agility and Environmental Factors. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 23, 326-342. [CrossRef] 100. · DOI
- Baierle, I.C.; da Silva, F.T.; de Faria Correa, R.G.; Schaefer, J.L.; Da Costa, M.B.; Benitez, G.B.; Benitez Nara, E.O. Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11779.
- CrossRef · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atobishi, T., Moh’d Abu Bakir, S., & Nosratabadi, S. (2024) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci14020037 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“The independent variable of digital capabilities was operationalized using a 7-item instrument adapted from Mollah et al. (Mollah et al. 2023) and measured on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent).”
Method
- Authors
- Mollah, M. A., Choi, J.-H., Hwang, S.-J., & Shin, J.-K.
- Affiliations
- University of Barishal (BD)
- School of Business Administration, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
- Keimyung University (KR)
- ORCID
- Mollah, Md Alamgir
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-05-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 7875
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4376279290
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 22.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- digital leadership, IT capabilities, organizational learning, sustainable organizational performance, IT infrastructure, mediating effect, knowledge-based view, Industry 4.0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review