Cited by 0Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchAI in Service Interactionsscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Climate Resilience and Artificial Intelligence in Tourism: A Two-Stage Bibliometric Review and Post Hoc Evidence Audit (2019–2025)

Open access
Zaftis, Evangelos (Vangelis), Papatheodorou, Andreas·2026·Sustainability

Abstract

Background: Tourism is among the most climate-sensitive service industries, yet it is simultaneously undergoing rapid digital transformation through artificial intelligence (AI). The overlap and thematic relationships between the retrieved climate resilience and AI-in-tourism literature require empirical description. Methods: We conduct a PRISMA 2020- and PRISMA-S-informed, two-stage bibliometric science mapping review of Scopus and the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection (2019–2025), executed in 2026 and implemented in R (bibliometrix) under the SPAR-4-SLR protocol, complemented by a post hoc-focused full-text evidence audit developed during revision. Stage 1 maps the two parent literatures (N = 9513; Stream A = 2409, Stream B = 7177, shared = 73); Stage 2 is a separately searched exploratory corpus (N = 440) that is not the mathematical intersection of the parent streams. Key findings. The parent fields are large and expanding (24.59% annual growth) but show limited retrieved set overlap: cross-stream overlap is below 1% (0.64% unscreened; 0.77% screened; equivalently 3.03% of Stream A and 1.02% of Stream B), a measure of retrieved set overlap rather than of disciplinary isolation. The retained exploratory corpus has a 53.79% CAGR, and 214 of its 440 records fall outside the screened parent union. Its early relevance screening trail could not be reconstructed, so these findings describe the retained dataset and do not establish field-wide growth or convergence. Post hoc audit. Applying substantive tourism, AI, and climate hazard criteria to 100 assessed full texts identifies 14 studies for an exploratory audit (eight scenario-based, three prediction, and three association), spanning snow, thermal exposure, flooding and landslides, water, and recreation; none demonstrates an evaluated AI-led adaptation benefit. Implications: The findings motivate testing AI-supported climate risk decisions in tourism; they do not demonstrate improved resilience. Non-retrieval of 29 of 129 sought reports (22.5%) and post hoc selection limit the audit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su182010615

Cites

37 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Kraus, 2022, Literature reviews as independent studies: Guidelines for academic practice, Rev. Manag. Sci., 16, 2577
  2. Dang, 2025, Integrating remote sensing and artificial intelligence for landslide detection and susceptibility analysis along tourism routes in Da Bac district, Hoa Binh province, Vietnam, Vietnam J. Earth Sci., 47, 430
  3. Arabadzhyan, 2021, Measuring destination image: A novel approach based on visual data mining. An application to European islands, J. Destin. Mark. Manag., 20, 100611
  4. Dwivedi, 2023, Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 71, 102642
  5. Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, 5998
  6. Blei, 2003, Latent Dirichlet allocation, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 993
  7. Chen, 2021, Chasing clean air: Pollution-induced travels in China, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 8, 59

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Zaftis, E. (., & Papatheodorou, A.
Affiliations
Department of Tourism Economics and Management, School of Business, University of the Aegean, 82132 Chios, Greece
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-10-19
Volume
18
Issue
20
Pages
10615
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7222937738
Cited by
0
References
37
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
climate resilience, artificial intelligence, tourism, climate change adaptation, digital transformation, climate risk, snow and ice, heat exposure, water resources, recreation, AI-based decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review