Cited by 56Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Deepfake Video Detection Based on MesoNet with Preprocessing Module

Open access
Xia, Zhiming, Qiao, Tong, Xu, Ming, Wu, Xiaoshuai, Han, Li, Chen, Yunzhi·2022·Symmetry

Abstract

With the development of computer hardware and deep learning, face manipulation videos represented by Deepfake have been widely spread on social media. From the perspective of symmetry, many forensics methods have been raised, while most detection performance might drop under compression attacks. To solve this robustness issue, this paper proposes a Deepfake video detection method based on MesoNet with preprocessing module. First, the preprocessing module is established to preprocess the cropped face images, which increases the discrimination among multi-color channels. Next, the preprocessed images are fed into the classic MesoNet. The detection performance of proposed method is verified on two datasets; the AUC on FaceForensics++ can reach 0.974, and it can reach 0.943 on Celeb-DF which is better than the current methods. More importantly, even in the case of heavy compression, the detection rate can still be more than 88%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sym14050939

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Koopman, M.; Rodriguez, A.M.; Geradts, Z. Detection of deepfake video manipulation. In Proceedings of the 20th Irish machine vision and image processing conference (IMVIP), Ulster University, Ulster, Northern Ireland, 29-31 August 2018.
  2. Lugstein, Florian and Baier, Simon and Bachinger, Gregor and Uhl, Andreas PRNU-based Deepfake Detection. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, Virtual, 22-25 June 2021; pp. 7-12
  3. Agarwal, S.; Farid, H.; Gu, Y.; He, M.; Nagano, K.; Li, H. Protecting World Leaders Against Deep Fakes. In Proceedings of the CVPR Workshops, Long Beach, CA, USA, 16-21 June 2019; Volume 1.
  4. Dufour, N.; Gully, A. Contributing data to deepfake detection research. Google AI Blog 2019, 1, 3.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xia, Z., Qiao, T., Xu, M., Wu, X., Han, L., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College (CN)
  • School of Communication Engineering, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310005, China
Corresponding author
  • Qiao, Tong
  • Xu, Ming
Venue
Symmetry
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-05
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
939
ISSN
2073-8994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229019234
Cited by
56
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Symmetry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
deepfake detection, face manipulation, mesonets, compression attacks, robustness, face forensics, FaceForensics++, Celeb-DF

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review