Cited by 16Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Drug-Resistant Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis Hinder TB Elimination Plans? A Case from Delhi, India

Open access
Lohiya, Sheelu, Tripathy, Jaya Prasad, Sagili, Karuna, Khanna, Vishal, Kumar, Ravinder, Ojha, Arun, Bhatnagar, Anuj, Khanna, Ashwani·2020·Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease

Abstract

Extrapulmonary drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-EPTB) poses a formidable diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.Besides associated with high morbidity, it is a major financial burden for the patient and the health system. In spite of this, it has often been neglected as it does not “pose” a visible public health threat. We study clinical profiles, treatment outcomes, and factors associated with unfavourable outcomes among DR-EPTB patients under programmatic settings in New Delhi, India, and evaluate how this could impact TB elimination. A retrospective analysis of all DR-EPTB patients registered at three nodal DR-TB centres in Delhi in 2016 was carried out. Of the 1261 DR-TB patients registered, 203 (16%) were DR-EPTB, with lymph nodes (118, 58%) being the most common site, followed by bone (69, 34%). Nearly 29% (n = 58) experienced adverse drug reactions with severe vomiting (26, 13 %), joint pain (21, 10%) and behavioral disorder (15, 7%). History of previous TB treatment was observed in a majority of the cases (87.7%). Nearly one-third of DR-EPTB cases (33%) had unfavourable treatment outcomes, with loss-to-follow-up (n = 40, 58%) or death (n = 14, 20%) being the most common unfavourable outcomes. In the adjusted analysis, weight band 31–50 kilograms (aRR = 1.8, 1.2–3.4) and h/o previous TB (aRR = 2.1, 1.1–4.8) were mainly associated with unfavourable outcomes. TB elimination efforts need to focus on all forms of TB, including DR-EPTB, leaving no one behind, in order to realise the dream of ending TB.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/tropicalmed5030109

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rate of rifampicin resistance among epTB cases in this study (4.83%) was lower than rates reported in previous Indian studies by Kant et al. (13.4%), Lohiya et al. (16%), and Misra et al. (2021).

    “the study found that the rate of rifampicin resistance among epTB cases was 4.83%, which is lower than the rate reported by previous studies conducted in India by Kant et al.,2018 (13.4%)15, Lohiya et al. 2020 (16%)16, and Misra et al. in 202117.”

    From Prevalence of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and factors influencing successful treatment outcomes among notified cases in South India (2025) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results (§4.1) and Discussion (§5) say that 203 of 1,261 registered drug-resistant TB patients (16%) had extrapulmonary TB. The citing sentence reverses the denominator: 16% is not the rate of rifampicin resistance among extrapulmonary TB cases. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lohiya, S., Tripathy, J. P., Sagili, K., Khanna, V., Kumar, R., Ojha, A., Bhatnagar, A., & Khanna, A.
Affiliations
  • Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Hospital (IN)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur (IN)
  • International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (US)
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Rajan Babu Institute of Pulmonary Medicine and Tuberculosis, New Delhi 110009 India
Corresponding author
Lohiya, Sheelu
Venue
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-01
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
109
ISSN
2414-6366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040405981
Cited by
16
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
  • World Health Organization
  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Keywords
drug-resistant tuberculosis, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, tuberculous lymphadenitis, bone tuberculosis, adverse drug reactions, treatment outcomes, loss to follow-up, tuberculosis elimination, previous TB treatment, body weight, New Delhi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review