The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Joining Technologies for Automotive Battery Systems Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
An automotive battery pack for use in electric vehicles consists of a large number of individual battery cells that are structurally held and electrically connected. Making the required electrical and structural joints represents several challenges, including, joining of multiple and thin highly conductive/reflective materials of varying thicknesses, potential damage (thermal, mechanical, or vibrational) during joining, a high joint durability requirement, and so on. This paper reviews the applicability of major and emerging joining techniques to support the wide range of joining requirements that exist during battery pack manufacturing. It identifies the advantages, disadvantages, limitations, and concerns of the joining technologies. The maturity and application potential of current joining technologies are mapped with respect to manufacturing readiness levels (MRLs). Further, a Pugh matrix is used to evaluate suitable joining candidates for cylindrical, pouch, and prismatic cells by addressing the aforementioned challenges. Combining Pugh matrix scores, MRLs, and application domains, this paper identifies the potential direction of automotive battery pack joining.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Coupled Thermal-Mechanical Analysis of Ultrasonic Bonding Mechanism
Zhang, C., & Li, L. (2009) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B · doi:10.1007/s11663-008-9224-9 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
State-of-Charge Estimation of Li-Ion Battery in Electric Vehicles: A Deep Neural Network Approach
How, D. N. T., Hannan, M. A., Lipu, M. S. H., Sahari, K. S. M., Ker, P. J., & Muttaqi, K. M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2020.3004294 · Cited by 337
Dhara, S., & Das, A. (2020) · Materials Science and Engineering: A · doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.139795 · Cited by 122
Self-citationJinasena, A., Burheim, O. S., & Strømman, A. H. (2021) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries7010014 · Cited by 66
Saariluoma, H., Piiroinen, A., Unt, A., Hakanen, J., Rautava, T., & Salminen, A. (2020) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries6030047 · Cited by 48
A Review on Laser-Assisted Joining of Aluminium Alloys to Other Metals
Bunaziv, I., Akselsen, O. M., Ren, X., Nyhus, B., Eriksson, M., & Gulbrandsen-Dahl, S. (2021) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met11111680 · Cited by 48
TEM analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of graphene coated Al-Cu micro joints
Mypati, O., Kumar, P. P., Pal, S. K., & Srirangam, P. (2022) · Carbon Trends · doi:10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100223 · Cited by 12
Kim, Y., Jeong, S. J., Yun, S. M., & Lee, J. I. (2022) · Journal of Welding and Joining · doi:10.5781/jwj.2022.40.5.7 · Cited by 11
Singh, R., Arora, N., & Choudhary, A. (2026) · Welding in the World · doi:10.1007/s40194-026-02375-5 · Cited by 6
“Al –Cu interconnects can be joined by ultrasonic welding (USW), resistance spot welding (RSW), and laser welding [17–19].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Das, A., Li, D., Williams, D., & Greenwood, D.
- Venue
- World Electric Vehicle Journal
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-07-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 2032-6653 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768711797
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
