Cited by 66Environmental Impact and SustainabilityAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchExtraction and Separation Processes

A flexible model for benchmarking the energy usage of automotive lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing

Open access
Jinasena, Asanthi, Burheim, Odne Stokke, Strømman, Anders Hammer·2021·Batteries

Abstract

The increasing use of electric vehicle batteries in the world has a significant impact on both society and the environment. Thus, there is a need for the availability of transparent information on resource allocation. Battery manufacturing process details in this regard are not available in academia or the public. The available energy data on manufacturing has a high variation. Furthermore, different process steps have different energy and material demands. A process model can benchmark the energy usage, provide detailed process data, and compare various cell productions which in turn can be used in life-cycle assessment studies to reduce the variation and provide directions for improvements. Therefore, a cell manufacturing model is developed for the calculation of energy and material demands for different battery types, plant capacities, and process steps. The model consists of the main process steps, machines, intermediate products and building service units. Furthermore, the results are validated using literature values. For a case study of a 2 GWh plant that produces prismatic NMC333 cells, the total energy requirement on a theoretical and optimal basis is suggested to be 44.6Whinproduction/Whcellcapacity. This energy consumption in producing batteries is dominated by electrode drying, and dry room. Energy usage for a variety of cell types for a similar plant capacity shows that the standard deviation in the results is low (47.23±13.03Wh/Wh).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/batteries7010014

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2020: Entering the Decade of Electric Drive; Technical Report; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2020. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Coulson, J.M.; Richardson, J.F.; Backhurst, J.R.; Harker, J.H. Chemical Engineering Volume 1: Fluid Flow, Heat Transfer and Mass Transfer, 6th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1999; p. 895.
  3. Richardson, J.F.; Harker, J.H.; Backhurst, J.R. Chemical Engineering Volume 2: Particle Technology and Separation Processes, 5th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2002; p. 1183.
  4. Sinnott, R. Chemical Engineering Design, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; Volume 6, p. 1038.
  5. Font, F.; Protas, B.; Richardson, G.; Foster, J.M. Binder migration during drying of lithium-ion battery electrodes: Modelling and comparison to experiment. J. Power Sources 2018, 393, 177-185. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jinasena, A., Burheim, O. S., & Strømman, A. H.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
  • Jinasena, Asanthi
  • Burheim, Odne Stokke
  • Strømman, Anders Hammer
Venue
Batteries
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
14
ISSN
2313-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3129392543
Cited by
66
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Batteries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Freyr Battery AS, Norway (02-2019-IP172-FREYR)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
manufacturing process modeling, electric vehicle batteries, electrode drying, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review