Cited by 275Marine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geographic extent and chronology of the invasion of non-native lionfish (Pterois volitans [Linnaeus 1758] and P. miles [Bennett 1828]) in the Western North Atlantic and Caribbean Sea

Open access
Schofield, Pamela·2009·Aquatic Invasions

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific lionfishes (Pterois volitans [Linnaeus 1758] and P. miles [Bennett 1828]: Family Scorpaenidae) are the first non-native marine fishes to establish in the Western North Atlantic. The chronology of the invasion is reported here using records from the US Geological Survey’s Nonindigenous Aquatic Species database. Currently, lionfish are established off the Atlantic coast of the USA from the Florida Keys to Cape Hatteras (North Carolina), the Great Antilles, Bermuda, Bahamas, Cayman Islands and Turks and Caicos. The species have been reported from only one island in the Lesser Antilles (St. Croix), but it is not yet established there. Lionfish are established in Mexico, Honduras and Costa Rica. Reports have come from the Gulf of Mexico (Florida), Belize, Panama and Colombia; although lionfish are not considered established in these localities at this time (August 2009), invasion is likely imminent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3391/ai.2009.4.3.5

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–275 of 275

Metadata

Authors
Schofield, P.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Schofield, Pamela
Venue
Aquatic Invasions
Published
2009-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
473-479
ISSN
  • 1798-6540 (ISSN-L)
  • 1818-5487
OpenAlex
W2103652807
Cited by
271
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Aquatic Invasions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
lionfish, Pterois volitans, Pterois miles, biological invasions, geographic range expansion, western North Atlantic, Caribbean Sea, Indo-Pacific species, invasive species distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review