Cited by 67Medication Adherence and ComplianceMental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major Depression

Patients' views of antidepressants: from first experiences to becoming expert

Open access
Schofield, Peter, Crosland, Ann, Waheed, Waquas, Aseem, Saadia, Gask, Linda, Wallace, Annie, Dickens, April, Tylee, André·2011·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients discontinue antidepressant treatment earlier than prescribed. The factors behind this and the influences on patients' choices about whether to take medication remain poorly understood. AIM: To explore factors that influence patients' decisions about taking antidepressant medication. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: Interviews were conducted across three sites: London, East Lancashire, and North East England. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 65 primary care patients who were prescribed antidepressants in the past year for depression or mixed anxiety/depression. RESULTS: Participants described their first course of antidepressants as typically occurring when they had 'hit rock bottom', having exhausted all other possibilities; therefore, there was little sense of a positive choice at this stage. There would typically follow a period of experimentation where it was usual to stop and restart medication, often several times. Ultimately, these recurring cycles lead to participants becoming more expert about their condition and better able to make an informed decision about medication. For younger participants, recovery typically remained a goal, although for older people there was often an acceptance that their condition, and medication use, would be long term. CONCLUSION: Participants' accounts demonstrated how they could become expert at managing their condition through a process of trial and error.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp11x567045

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Grime J, Pollock K. Patients' ambivalence about taking antidepressants: a qualitative study. Pharm J 2003; 271(7270): 516-519.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schofield, P., Crosland, A., Waheed, W., Aseem, S., Gask, L., Wallace, A., Dickens, A., & Tylee, A.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Sunderland (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
  • Kings Health Partners (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
61
Issue
585
Pages
e142-e148
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2016460740
Cited by
67
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
antidepressants, patient decision-making, medication adherence, depression, mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, trial and error, patient expertise, primary care, drug discontinuation
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review