Cited by 41Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Experiences with online consultation systems in primary care: case study of one early adopter site

Open access
Casey, Michael, Shaw, Sara, Swinglehurst, Deborah·2017·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

Background: There is a strong policy drive towards implementing alternatives to face-to-face consultations in general practice to improve access, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. These alternatives embrace novel technologies that are assumed to offer potential to improve care. Aim: To explore the introduction of one online consultation system (Tele-Doc) and how it shapes working practices. Design and setting: Mixed methods case study in an inner-city general practice. Method: The study was conducted through interviews with IT developers, clinicians, and administrative staff, and scrutiny of documents, websites, and demonstrator versions of Tele-Doc, followed by thematic analysis and discourse analysis. Results: Three interrelated themes were identified: online consultation systems as innovation, managing the ‘messiness’ of general practice consultations, and redistribution of the work of general practice. These themes raise timely questions about what it means to consult in contemporary general practice. Uptake of Tele-Doc by patients was low. Much of the work of the consultation was redistributed to patients and administrators, sometimes causing misunderstandings. The ‘messiness’ of consultations was hard to eliminate. In-house training focused on the technical application rather than associated transformations to practice work that were not anticipated. GPs welcomed varied modes of consulting, but the aspiration of improved efficiency was not realised in practice. Conclusion: Tele-Doc offers a new kind of consultation that is still being worked out in practice. It may offer convenience for patients with discrete, single problems, and a welcome variation to GPs’ workload. Tele-Doc’s potential for addressing more complex problems and achieving efficiency is less clear, and its adoption may involve unforeseeable consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp17x693137

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study found 70.88% of users avoided face-to-face primary care during the pandemic, with e-consultation rates increasing from 5.61 per 1000 patients in March 2020 to 33.1 per 1000 patients in June 2020 in one healthcare system.

    “One study found 70.88% of users avoided face-to-face primary care during the pandemic, 30 with e-consultation rates increasing from 5.61 per 1000 patients in March 2020 to 33.1 per 1000 patients in June 2020 in one healthcare system. 28”

    From Effectiveness and safety of asynchronous telemedicine consultations in general practice: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [30]

    Citation 28 is attached to the March–June 2020 e-consultation rates; the 70.88% figure has a separate citation. The Introduction and Results describe an earlier Tele-Doc case study, but our copy gives neither of the claimed rates. Searches for the figures and the March–June 2020 period found no matching passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]Stevens S Simon Stevens speech to NHS Confederation conference 2016 2016 NHS England https://www.england.nhs.uk/2016/06/simon-stevens-confed-speech/ (accessed 19 Sep 2017).
  2. [21]Taylor S Wetherell M Taylor S Yates S Locating and conducting discourse analytic research Discourse as data: a guide to analysis 2001 London Sage Publications 5 48
  3. [25]Berg M Aarts J van der Lei J ICT in healthcare: sociotechnical approaches Methods Inf Med 2003 42 4 297 301 14534625
  4. [48]Stake RE Denzin NK Lincoln YS Qualitative case studies The Sage handbook of qualitative research 2005 3rd edn Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications 443 466

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Casey, M., Shaw, S., & Swinglehurst, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2017-10-09
Volume
67
Issue
664
Pages
e736-e743
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2763556726
Cited by
41
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CS-2015-15-004)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
telemedicine, general practice, primary care, work practices, workload redistribution, patient uptake, consultation efficiency, IT implementation, general practitioners
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Workload, Patient Satisfaction, Remote Consultation, Internet, Qualitative Research, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review