Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single exosome study reveals subpopulations distributed among cell lines with variability related to membrane content

Open access
Smith, Zachary J., Lee, Changwon, Rojalin, Tatu, Carney, Randy P., Hazari, Sidhartha, Knudson, Alisha, Lam, Kit, Saari, Heikki, Ibañez, Elisa Lazaro, Viitala, Tapani, Laaksonen, Timo, Yliperttula, Marjo, Wachsmann‐Hogiu, Sebastian·2015·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

Current analysis of exosomes focuses primarily on bulk analysis, where exosome‐to‐exosome variability cannot be assessed. In this study, we used Raman spectroscopy to study the chemical composition of single exosomes. We measured spectra of individual exosomes from 8 cell lines. Cell‐line‐averaged spectra varied considerably, reflecting the variation in total exosomal protein, lipid, genetic, and cytosolic content. Unexpectedly, single exosomes isolated from the same cell type also exhibited high spectral variability. Subsequent spectral analysis revealed clustering of single exosomes into 4 distinct groups that were not cell‐line specific. Each group contained exosomes from multiple cell lines, and most cell lines had exosomes in multiple groups. The differences between these groups are related to chemical differences primarily due to differing membrane composition. Through a principal components analysis, we identified that the major sources of spectral variation among the exosomes were in cholesterol content, relative expression of phospholipids to cholesterol, and surface protein expression. For example, exosomes derived from cancerous versus non‐cancerous cell lines can be largely separated based on their relative expression of cholesterol and phospholipids. We are the first to indicate that exosome subpopulations are shared among cell types, suggesting distributed exosome functionality. The origins of these differences are likely related to the specific role of extracellular vesicle subpopulations in both normal cell function and carcinogenesis, and they may provide diagnostic potential at the single exosome level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v4.28533

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Smith, Z. J., Lee, C., Rojalin, T., Carney, R. P., Hazari, S., Knudson, A., Lam, K., Saari, H., Ibañez, E. L., Viitala, T., Laaksonen, T., Yliperttula, M., & Wachsmann‐Hogiu, S.
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
28533-28533
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2195965780
Cited by
321
References
6
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single exosome study reveals subpopulations distributed among cell lines with variability related to membrane content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v4.28533
The paper
Smith, Z. J., Lee, C., Rojalin, T., Carney, R. P., Hazari, S., Knudson, A., Lam, K., Saari, H., Ibañez, E. L., Viitala, T., Laaksonen, T., Yliperttula, M., & Wachsmann‐Hogiu, S. (2015). Single exosome study reveals subpopulations distributed among cell lines with variability related to membrane content. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.28533

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.