CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tsung-mi's Perfect Enlightenment Retreat: Ch'an Ritual During the T'ang Dynasty

Gregory, Peter N.·1993·Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie
DOI 10.3406/asie.1993.1063
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Gregory Peter N. Tsung-mi's Perfect Enlightenment Retreat: Ch'an Ritual During the T'ang Dynasty. In: Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie, vol. 7, 1993. Numéro spécial sur le Chan/Zen : Special Issue on Chan/Zen. En l'honneur de Yanagida Seizan. pp. 115-147.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/asie.1993.1063

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Gregory, P. N.
Corresponding author
Gregory, Peter N.
Venue
Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie
Publisher
PERSEE Program
Published
1993
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
115-147
ISSN
0766-1177 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3406/asie.1993.1063
OpenAlex
W2042170091
Semantic Scholar
2a0d687e2990103ade88f72d6cccdb72a149121d
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cahiers d Extrême-Asie (publishedVersion)
  • Persée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Zen Buddhism, Buddhist ritual, Chinese Buddhism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review